著者

渡部 倫子

出版者

広島大学大学院教育学研究科

雑誌

広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第二部, 文化教育開発関連領域 (ISSN:13465554)

巻号頁・発行日

no.61, pp.239-244, 2012

---

This study examines and refines a grammar placement test using the classical test analysis. The participants were 44 international students who were studying Japanese at Okayama University in Japan. After revisions were carried out on grammar test items that are high in item discrimination and low in item facility. The new version was found to be more efficient than the old one, since it make the overall test more difficult while keeping the same reliability level as before. When the result of dividing classes was predicted, it was found that new grammar test items were significant predictors.

著者

渡部 倫子

出版者

広島大学

雑誌

広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要. 第二部, 文化教育開発関連領域 (ISSN:13465554)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, pp.175-183, 2004-03-28

---

This purpose of present study was to develop an evaluation scale in order to study how native speakers evaluate the speech and behavior of Japanese learners. To confirm the reliability and the validity of this scale, I carried out a questionnaire survey by viewing how 83 native speakers responded these items after they saw a videotape recording of a learner's free conversation with a native speaker. The questionnaires contain of 55 items (34 items for learners' competence evaluated by native speakers and 21 items for overall evaluation) were selected from the former related studies and the result of follow-up interview to 50 native speakers. In this analysis, 5 factors for learners' competence evaluated by native speakers and 3 factors for overall evaluation were extracted from the factor analysis first. The reliability of the scale was confirmed by the Good-Poor analysis and Cronbach's coefficient alpha. Furthermore, I propose the hypothesis of causal relation model of native speakers' evaluation based on Peason's product-moment correlation coefficient and the multiple regression analysis. As a result, the reliability and the validity of the scale are proved. Arid from my hypothesis of the causal relation model of native speakers' evaluation, it was found that 1) 'Expressiveness', 'interlocution competence', 'Listener-friendliness and comprehensibility' and 'vocabulary and expression' influence the evaluation of 'Japanese oral proficiency'. 2) 'Communication strategies' influences the evaluation of 'approachability'. 3) 'Communication strategies' and 'expressiveness' influence the evaluation of 'positive attitude'.

著者

渡部 倫子 坂野 永理

出版者

岡山大学留学生センター

雑誌

大学教育研究紀要 (ISSN:18815952)

巻号頁・発行日

no.2, pp.39-47, 2006-12

著者

松田 真希子 林 良子 渡部 倫子 金田 純平

出版者

金沢大学

雑誌

挑戦的萌芽研究

巻号頁・発行日

2013-04-01

---

本研究では日本語教育のためのデータマイニング技術開発を目的に、[1]既存データマイニング技術の日本語教育研究への応用可能性の検討、[2]既存ツールのカスタマイズ、[3]ツール開発、[4]マニュアル開発を行った。その結果、[1]ではKh-Coder,SVtoolsなどを用いた日本語教育研究への応用研究を行い、有効性を示した。[2]では日本語学習者誤用換言対データを約3000対開発した。[3]では日本語学習者アクセントの自動評定技術開発を行った。[4]ではマニュアルを一部Web公開した。学術的成果としては、6件の学術論文の発表、11件の学会発表等を行った。

著者

渡部 倫子

出版者

中国四国教育学会

雑誌

教育学研究ジャーナル (ISSN:13495836)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.77-81, 2005-03-01 (Released:2017-04-09)

参考文献数

12

---

The purpose is to examine what points of Japanese learners' performance tend to be evaluated positively or negatively and judged as good or bad points in conversations with 25 Japanese native speakers and 25 Japanese language teachers. In this research, participants evaluated the non-Japanese university students' (NNS) Japanese. If they felt the NNS's Japanese was good, they gave ○. If they felt the NNS's Jpapanese was bad, they gave × as they watched video recordings of the learners' free conversations with Japanese native speakers. Participants also gave comments of their reasons for awarding ○ or ×. All comments were classified onto cards according to their content. These were treated as evaluation factors.The results show that both Japanese native speakers and Japanese language teachers tend to evaluate:(1) vocabulary and expression, discourse competence and communication strategies positively.(2) grammar and pronunciation negatively.(3) Japanese native speakers tend to evaluate sociolinguistic competence positively, whereas Japanese language teachers tend to evaluate it negatively.