著者

速水 清孝

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.71, no.605, pp.183-187, 2006-07-30 (Released:2017-02-17)

参考文献数

18

---

The Kenchikushi Law for Architects & Building Engineers was completed by reform act in 1951. Purpose of this study is to clarify the reform process of Article 3 of the Law: Types of buildings which require Kenchikushi's design or superintendence. Conclusion of this study is as follows: 1. By reform act of the Law in 1951, Types of buildings were broadened than those of Kakuei Tanaka's declaration in 1950, but most of the housing in need were exempted from the Law. Ryoichi Naito, then the Director of Building Administration Division, Ministry of Construction, supposed every building should be designed or superintended by Kenchikushi. Naito's hope wasn't realized. 2. The first qualification standard of Kenchikushi, being considered simultaneously, was affected by the limitation of the Law. 3. The decision on the limitation imposed a serious problem on building administration officials of regional governments. Therefore, they began to expect the system of architectural agent for procedures required by laws to replace the role of architectural engineer outside the limit.

著者

速水 清孝

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.82, no.734, pp.1039-1049, 2017 (Released:2017-04-30)

---

This study is a report on the design and construction process of “Fukushima Prefectural Government Office Building (1954)”. This building was designed by Koichi Sato (1878-1941). It began to construct from 1938 before WWII but completion was in 1954 after WWII and designed by Takekuni Ikeda (1924- ) who belonged to Toshiro Yamashita Architects Firm. Namely, on this building, two architects, who were famous for Japanese modern architectural history, were involved until completion. But information more than that, for example, the details of design before WWII and competition after WWII is not clear. In this study, author tried to find it by the newspaper articles and the document which remains in government office. The results are as follows: 1. This building project was begun earlier than “Shiga Prefectural Government Office Building” project which was the final completion before WWII. Nevertheless, it was not completed by delay of preparation of the construction materials. Author clarified the development process of the design of this building. Koichi Satoh designed five prefectural government office buildings. From the view of Satoh's careers of architectural work, this is the largest scale, the design which reflected all of his method of prefectural government buildings. And in case of “Shiga Prefectural Government Office Building”, he collaborated with Hiroshi Kunieda on the detail design phase. But in case of this, he designed alone. From these points, author showed that this building should be thought the grand sum for him in his prefectural government office building designs. 2. At first this building was designed in Reinforced Concrete Structure. But the construction of this building was cancelled after finishing first floor in 1939. After that, in 1940, this building extended second floor designed by Koichi Satoh by wooden frame structure. This extension is “Fukushima Prefectural Government Office Temporary Building” which no one knows in his architectural works. Author found its' outside appearance. 3. Author clarified, to some extent, the detail of the nomination design competition held in 1952. About this competition, only Takekuni Ikeda, who joined this as a chief designer of Toshiro Yamashita's Architect Firm wrote, but no one knows more than that. Four architects, who were Toshiro Yamashita, Yoshitoki Nishimura, Gumpei Matsuda, and Takeo Satoh, submitted their design for this competition. And Design Committee consisted of three referees, who were Hideto Kishida, Denji Nakamura, and Seiichi Kobayashi, chose Yamashita's design. Author found three designs to four submissions. As a result of comparison, instead of the design like a symbol of the authoritarianism before WWII, referees seek the design like a symbol of the democracy, and they finally chose Yamashita's design.

著者

速水 清孝

出版者

一般社団法人 日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会技術報告集 (ISSN:13419463)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.20, no.44, pp.363-366, 2014-02-20 (Released:2014-02-20)

被引用文献数

1 1

---

This paper is a report about the actual condition of financial aid for building demolition and restoration in Fukushima prefecture after Great East Japan Earthquake. Over 10,000 buildings were demolished by public expense after this disaster. 19 buildings which had cultural value were included. This building demolition by public expense was free for general people, and architectural professionals didn’t take part in the decision process of the demolition at all. These may had become the reason which made the demolition easy to choose.

著者

速水 清孝

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.71, no.607, pp.171-177, 2006

---

Purpose of this study is to examine contents about the Article 6 of the Bill of the Architect Law: regulation on Architect and its probable side jobs in the Imperial Diet before WW II. Conclusion of this study is as follows: 1. The Article 6 of the Bill had already been considered toward its amendment after the questionnaire to those mainly involved in the architectural business. 2. The amended Article 6 became rather ambiguous. Therefore, it was objected by the Members of the Imperial Diet. 3. Nevertheless, the legislators of the Bill did not make any farther major amendment to it before WWII. 4. The reason seems to be the existence of the Account Law, which had the similar law structure. 5. The Accountant Law was disputed due to lack of article to prohibit Registered Accountants from having probable side jobs. Therefore, a new bill was continued proposed to reform the Law only after two years of its enactment. 6. On the contrary, the Bill of the Architect Law had an article to prohibit Registered Architects from having probable side jobs, which seems why the legislators thought the Bill of the Architect Law as reasonable and did not feel necessity to amend it.

著者

村松 伸 鄭 昶源 後藤 淳 矢原 奈欧 速水 清孝 田村 景子 松本 康隆 藤森 照信

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

学術講演梗概集. 計画系 (ISSN:13414542)

巻号頁・発行日

no.2, pp.405-406, 2002-06

著者

速水 清孝

出版者

一般社団法人日本建築学会

雑誌

学術講演梗概集. F-2, 建築歴史・意匠 (ISSN:13414542)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2005, pp.231-232, 2005-07-31

著者

速水 清孝 市岡 綾子

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.78, no.694, pp.2521-2528, 2013-12

著者

速水 清孝

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.73, no.633, pp.2489-2495, 2008-11-30 (Released:2009-10-28)

---

The purpose of this study is to clarify the formation process of the Architect Law, which Tsuyoshi Ichiura personally proposed in 1976, and to consider its characteristics and significance for today. The characteristics of his proposal are as follows: 1. The Law is intended for the individual architectural designers. 2. The qualification of building engineers excluding architectural designers shall be defined by the Law for Professional Engineers, not the Kenchikushi Law forArchitects & Building Engineers. 3. Would not dispute what organization architectural designers shall belong to. 4. Attempted to solve the defect of the Kenchikushi Law for Architects & Building Engineers by improving the overall law system for architects and building engineers. Japanese architects at that time never accepted his proposal since they thought architects shall belong to dedicated architectural firms. However recently, it came to be known that by international standard, the qualification of architects shall belong to individuals, no matter what organization architects belong to. In that sense, his concept of proposal was a pioneer in Japan.