- 著者
- 
             
             Masami Goto
             
             Osamu Abe
             
             Akifumi Hagiwara
             
             Shohei Fujita
             
             Koji Kamagata
             
             Masaaki Hori
             
             Shigeki Aoki
             
             Takahiro Osada
             
             Seiki Konishi
             
             Yoshitaka Masutani
             
             Hajime Sakamoto
             
             Yasuaki Sakano
             
             Shinsuke Kyogoku
             
             Hiroyuki Daida
             
          
- 出版者
- Japanese Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
- 雑誌
- Magnetic Resonance in Medical Sciences (ISSN:13473182)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.rev.2021-0096,  (Released:2022-02-18)
- 参考文献数
- 106
- 被引用文献数
- 
             
             
             31
             
             
          
        
        Surface-based morphometry (SBM) is extremely useful for estimating the indices of cortical morphology, such as volume, thickness, area, and gyrification, whereas voxel-based morphometry (VBM) is a typical method of gray matter (GM) volumetry that includes cortex measurement. In cases where SBM is used to estimate cortical morphology, it remains controversial as to whether VBM should be used in addition to estimate GM volume. Therefore, this review has two main goals. First, we summarize the differences between the two methods regarding preprocessing, statistical analysis, and reliability. Second, we review studies that estimate cortical morphological changes using VBM and/or SBM and discuss whether using VBM in conjunction with SBM produces additional values. We found cases in which detection of morphological change in either VBM or SBM was superior, and others that showed equivalent performance between the two methods. Therefore, we concluded that using VBM and SBM together can help researchers and clinicians obtain a better understanding of normal neurobiological processes of the brain. Moreover, the use of both methods may improve the accuracy of the detection of morphological changes when comparing the data of patients and controls.In addition, we introduce two other recent methods as future directions for estimating cortical morphological changes: a multi-modal parcellation method using structural and functional images, and a synthetic segmentation method using multi-contrast images (such as T1- and proton density-weighted images).