- 著者
- Hirotoshi Watanabe Takeshi Morimoto Ko Yamamoto Yuki Obayashi Masahiro Natsuaki Kyohei Yamaji Manabu Ogita Satoru Suwa Tsuyoshi Isawa Takenori Domei Kenji Ando Shojiro Tatsushima Hiroki Watanabe Masanobu Oya Kazushige Kadota Hideo Tokuyama Tomohisa Tada Hiroki Sakamoto Hiroyoshi Mori Hiroshi Suzuki Tenjin Nishikura Kohei Wakabayashi Takeshi Kimura for the STOPDAPT-2 ACS Investigators
- 出版者
- The Japanese Circulation Society
- 雑誌
- Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.87, no.5, pp.657-668, 2023-04-25 (Released:2023-04-25)
- 参考文献数
- 28
Background: The REAL-CAD trial, reported in 2017, demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular events with high-intensity statins in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. However, data are scarce on the use of high-intensity statins in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Methods and Results: In STOPDAPT-2 ACS, which exclusively enrolled ACS patients between March 2018 and June 2020, 1,321 (44.2%) patients received high-intensity statins at discharge, whereas of the remaining 1,667 patients, 96.0% were treated with low-dose statins. High-intensity statins were defined as the maximum approved doses of strong statins in Japan. The incidence of the cardiovascular composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke) was significantly lower in patients with than without high-intensity statins (1.44% vs. 2.69% [log-rank P=0.025]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.94, P=0.03) and the effect was evident beyond 60 days after the index percutaneous coronary intervention (log-rank P=0.01; aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.86, P=0.02). As for the bleeding endpoint, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (0.99% vs. 0.73% [log-rank P=0.43]; aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.35–2.60, P=0.93).Conclusions: The prevalence of high-intensity statins has increased substantially in Japan. The use of the higher doses of statins in ACS patients recommended in the guidelines was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary cardiovascular composite endpoint compared with lower-dose statins.
- 著者
- Hirotoshi Watanabe Takeshi Morimoto Ko Yamamoto Yuki Obayashi Masahiro Natsuaki Kyohei Yamaji Manabu Ogita Satoru Suwa Tsuyoshi Isawa Takenori Domei Kenji Ando Shojiro Tatsushima Hiroki Watanabe Masanobu Oya Kazushige Kadota Hideo Tokuyama Tomohisa Tada Hiroki Sakamoto Hiroyoshi Mori Hiroshi Suzuki Tenjin Nishikura Kohei Wakabayashi Takeshi Kimura for the STOPDAPT-2 ACS Investigators
- 出版者
- The Japanese Circulation Society
- 雑誌
- Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.CJ-22-0650, (Released:2022-12-08)
- 参考文献数
- 28
Background: The REAL-CAD trial, reported in 2017, demonstrated a significant reduction in cardiovascular events with high-intensity statins in patients with chronic coronary syndrome. However, data are scarce on the use of high-intensity statins in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).Methods and Results: In STOPDAPT-2 ACS, which exclusively enrolled ACS patients between March 2018 and June 2020, 1,321 (44.2%) patients received high-intensity statins at discharge, whereas of the remaining 1,667 patients, 96.0% were treated with low-dose statins. High-intensity statins were defined as the maximum approved doses of strong statins in Japan. The incidence of the cardiovascular composite endpoint (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, stroke) was significantly lower in patients with than without high-intensity statins (1.44% vs. 2.69% [log-rank P=0.025]; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.48, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24–0.94, P=0.03) and the effect was evident beyond 60 days after the index percutaneous coronary intervention (log-rank P=0.01; aHR 0.38, 95% CI 0.17–0.86, P=0.02). As for the bleeding endpoint, there was no significant difference between the 2 groups (0.99% vs. 0.73% [log-rank P=0.43]; aHR 0.96, 95% CI 0.35–2.60, P=0.93).Conclusions: The prevalence of high-intensity statins has increased substantially in Japan. The use of the higher doses of statins in ACS patients recommended in the guidelines was associated with a significantly lower risk of the primary cardiovascular composite endpoint compared with lower-dose statins.
- 著者
- Makoto Miyake Misa Takegami Yuki Obayashi Masashi Amano Takeshi Kitai Tomoyuki Fujita Tadaaki Koyama Hidekazu Tanaka Kenji Ando Tatsuhiko Komiya Masaki Izumo Hiroya Kawai Kiyoyuki Eishi Kiyoshi Yoshida Takeshi Kimura Ryuzo Nawada Tomohiro Sakamoto Yoshisato Shibata Toshihiro Fukui Kenji Minatoya Kenichi Tsujita Yasushi Sakata Tetsuya Kimura Kumiko Sugio Atsushi Takita Atsushi Iwakura Toshihiro Tamura Kunihiro Nishimura Yutaka Furukawa Chisato Izumi for the BPV-AF Registry Group
- 出版者
- The Japanese Circulation Society
- 雑誌
- Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- pp.CJ-22-0226, (Released:2022-07-08)
- 参考文献数
- 28
- 被引用文献数
- 2
Background: Current guidelines equally recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a bioprosthetic valve (BPV); however, there are limited data comparing DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV.Methods and Results: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational registry (BPV-AF Registry) aimed to compare DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. The analysis included 479 patients (warfarin group, n=258; DOAC group, n=221). Surgical aortic valve replacement was performed in 74.4% and 36.7% of patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. During a mean follow up of 15.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 45 (17.4%) and 32 (14.5%) patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.51–1.50). No significant multiplicative interaction was observed between the anticoagulant effects and type of aortic valve procedure (P=0.577).Conclusions: Among AF patients with an aortic BPV, no significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of adverse clinical events between patients treated with warfarin and those treated with DOACs, suggesting that DOACs can be used as alternatives to warfarin in these patients.