著者

Satoshi Oka Yusuke Watanabe Masashi Amano Tsukasa Kamakura Chisato Izumi Kengo Kusano

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Reports (ISSN:24340790)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CR-23-0052, (Released:2023-08-09)

参考文献数

1

著者

Yasuaki Takeji Tomohiko Taniguchi Takeshi Morimoto Shinichi Shirai Takeshi Kitai Hiroyuki Tabata Kazuki Kitano Nobuhisa Ono Ryosuke Murai Kohei Osakada Koichiro Murata Masanao Nakai Hiroshi Tsuneyoshi Tomohisa Tada Masashi Amano Hiroki Shiomi Hirotoshi Watanabe Yusuke Yoshikawa Ko Yamamoto Mamoru Toyofuku Shojiro Tatsushima Norino Kanamori Makoto Miyake Hiroyuki Nakayama Kazuya Nagao Masayasu Izuhara Kenji Nakatsuma Moriaki Inoko Takanari Fujita Masahiro Kimura Mitsuru Ishii Shunsuke Usami Kenichiro Sawada Fumiko Nakazeki Marie Okabayashi Manabu Shirotani Yasutaka Inuzuka Tatsuhiko Komiya Kenji Minatoya Takeshi Kimura on behalf of the CURRENT AS Registry-2 Investigators

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CJ-21-1062, (Released:2022-04-19)

参考文献数

29

被引用文献数

2

---

Background: There is scarce data evaluating the current practice pattern and clinical outcomes for patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS), including both those who underwent surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) or transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and those who were managed conservatively in the TAVI era.Methods and Results: The Contemporary outcomes after sURgery and medical tREatmeNT in patients with severe Aortic Stenosis (CURRENT AS) Registry-2 is a prospective, physician-initiated, multicenter registry enrolling consecutive patients who were diagnosed with severe AS between April 2018 and December 2020 among 21 centers in Japan. The rationale for the prospective enrollment was to standardize the assessment of symptomatic status, echocardiographic evaluation, and other recommended diagnostic examinations such as computed tomography and measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide. Moreover, the schedule of clinical and echocardiographic follow up was prospectively defined and strongly recommended for patients who were managed conservatively. The entire study population consisted of 3,394 patients (mean age: 81.6 years and women: 60%). Etiology of AS was degenerative in 90% of patients. AS-related symptoms were present in 60% of patients; these were most often heart failure symptoms. The prevalence of high- and low-gradient AS was 58% and 42%, respectively, with classical and paradoxical low-flow low-gradient AS in 4.5% and 6.7%, respectively.Conclusions: The CURRENT AS Registry-2 might be large and meticulous enough to determine the appropriate timing of intervention for patients with severe AS in contemporary clinical practice.

著者

Makoto Miyake Misa Takegami Yuki Obayashi Masashi Amano Takeshi Kitai Tomoyuki Fujita Tadaaki Koyama Hidekazu Tanaka Kenji Ando Tatsuhiko Komiya Masaki Izumo Hiroya Kawai Kiyoyuki Eishi Kiyoshi Yoshida Takeshi Kimura Ryuzo Nawada Tomohiro Sakamoto Yoshisato Shibata Toshihiro Fukui Kenji Minatoya Kenichi Tsujita Yasushi Sakata Tetsuya Kimura Kumiko Sugio Atsushi Takita Atsushi Iwakura Toshihiro Tamura Kunihiro Nishimura Yutaka Furukawa Chisato Izumi for the BPV-AF Registry Group

出版者

The Japanese Circulation Society

雑誌

Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.CJ-22-0226, (Released:2022-07-08)

参考文献数

28

被引用文献数

2

---

Background: Current guidelines equally recommend direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) and warfarin for atrial fibrillation (AF) patients with a bioprosthetic valve (BPV); however, there are limited data comparing DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV.Methods and Results: This post-hoc subgroup analysis of a multicenter, prospective, observational registry (BPV-AF Registry) aimed to compare DOACs and warfarin in AF patients with an aortic BPV. The primary outcome was a composite of stroke, systemic embolism, major bleeding, heart failure requiring hospitalization, all-cause death, or BPV reoperation. The analysis included 479 patients (warfarin group, n=258; DOAC group, n=221). Surgical aortic valve replacement was performed in 74.4% and 36.7% of patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. During a mean follow up of 15.5 months, the primary outcome occurred in 45 (17.4%) and 32 (14.5%) patients in the warfarin and DOAC groups, respectively. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the 2 groups (adjusted hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval: 0.51–1.50). No significant multiplicative interaction was observed between the anticoagulant effects and type of aortic valve procedure (P=0.577).Conclusions: Among AF patients with an aortic BPV, no significant difference was observed in the composite outcome of adverse clinical events between patients treated with warfarin and those treated with DOACs, suggesting that DOACs can be used as alternatives to warfarin in these patients.