- 著者
-
立花 希一
TACHIBANA Kiichi
- 出版者
- 秋田大学教育文化学部
- 雑誌
- 秋田大学教育文化学部研究紀要 人文科学・社会科学 (ISSN:1348527X)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.67, pp.57-66, 2012-03-01
There were two psychologists, Karl Buhler and Alfred Adler, who had taught Popper. Popper rarely confessed his intellectual debt, but he exceptionally said that he owed to Karl Buhler. On the other hand, Popper condemned Adler's Individual Psychology as a pseudo-science. However, as we read Adler, we are surprised to find that Popper was greatly influenced by Adler in various points such as the logic of social situation, optimism, the regulative idea of the absolute truth, the view of science as modified commonsense and so on. Popper accepted Buhler’s psychology of learning. Viewing from these contexts, it seems to us that Popper’s thought was not original at all. However Popper changed the psychology of learning into the logic of scientific learning and proposed falsificationist methodology of science. His originality is found in this point.