著者
林 宏作 Hong-zuo LIN 桃山学院大学文学部
雑誌
国際文化論集 = INTERCULTURAL STUDIES (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日
no.7, pp.(7)-(19), 1993-02-25

阮籍の前半生は恰度曹魏が漢帝国を制する時代にあたるが、阮籍は病気などの口実を設け、紛雑した世から逃避し、一時の平静を得ていた。しかし後半生は、司馬氏が益々野心を増大させていった時期にあたり、その司馬昭が阮籍を常に側近とし望み通りに任せたので、司馬王朝のかけがえのない重臣のような存在にみえたが、実は司馬氏にとって阮籍は極めて有効な利用価値のある人間にすぎず、その本心では彼を信じていなかったのである。本論文は史実に基づいて阮籍とその生きた魏晉時代について論じた。Although the first half of Ruan Ji's life coincides precisely with the period when Cao Cao of the Wei kingdom was putting an end to the reign of the Han emperors, Ruan Ji used the pretext of illness to secrete himself away from the troubled world and gain a period of repose. Subsequently, however, he came to be used by the increasingly-ambitious Sima family which had taken defacto control in Wei (and was eventually to establish its own Jin dynasty), and became the advisor of Si-ma Zhao. Nevertheless, although Ruan Ji appeared to play an essential role as a statesman of the kingdom, it is apparent that the Si-ma clan did not genuinely trust him, but merely regarded him as someone with extraordinarily high use-value. The present paper uses historical sources to discuss Ruan Ji and the transition from Wei to Jin through which he lived.
著者
山川 偉也
出版者
桃山学院大学
雑誌
国際文化論集 (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日
no.32, pp.67-150, 2005-06-15

Notifying my intention in the study of Zeno's four paradoxes to be continuedin a long series, I would like to convey my true motive. I have no interest indealing with Zeno's discourse qua "puzzle." And much less I intend to issuesome new and unexplored "solutions" of Zeno's discourses qua "puzzles."which might be appreciated only by a small circle of specialists.My original intention is to show a fact that something "invisible" lurks behindthe "visible" surface of Zeno's discourses. Zeno's "paradoxes" as "visible"strata are pregnant of the "invisible" meaning. However, the "invisible" meaningin question is not separated from its "visible" layer. The "visible" thing itselfassumes the meaning of the "invisible." Thus, the "invisible" is a secretcounterpart of the "visible."The subject-matter Zeno called into question and indeed Zeno himself hide behindthe "visible" surface qua "puzzle." Therefore, in order to excavate Zeno's"invisible" figure and bring it to light successfully, we must remove a largequantity of surface soil which has covered Zeno's true identity. Thus breakingthrough the bulky layers of "paradoxes," we have, by all means, to get to thesolid rock of Zeno's thought.Thus, in this paper `Zeno's Four Paradoxes against Motion' I shall begin toshow my provisional outlook of Zeno's paradoxes and then proceed to diggingup the first layer of Zeno's paradoxes, which a large quantity of surface soil qua"puzzles" has covered. Thus I hope that I could show you some invisible andhidden dimensions of Zeno's paradoxes, which had gone unnoticed for a longtime.
著者
橋内 武
出版者
桃山学院大学
雑誌
国際文化論集 (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日
no.37, pp.453-454, 2007-12-10
著者
後藤 邦夫
出版者
桃山学院大学
雑誌
国際文化論集 (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.22, pp.131-148, 2000-12-20

The third, and final, part of this series deals with theoretical thinking of Otto Neurath, especially concentrating to his discussion on basic problems of scientific learning. This gives also an explanation of philosophical diversification of people of the Vienna Circle, or logical empiricism, which is often thought as a monolithic, rigorous, inflexible rationalist group. On the contrary, Vienna Circle was a movement, opened to all anti-metaphysical people. Influenced by Weber, Simmel and others, who bore the best tradition of German social science in the last phase of the German Empire, Neurath developed his early theoretical activity. He pursued an ideal of pure science on the one hand, and wanted to realize the social reform on the other. It was the common attitude of young scholars who were to join First Vienna Circle. Responding to the evident decline of the mechanistic world picture in the end of the nineteenth century, these young scholars tried to establish a bridge between Machian empiricism and conventionalism of Poincare. Through an intensive study of Duhem's work, Neurath and Hahn reached an assertion, which was an extension of Duhem's thesis from physics to science in general. In the Second Vienna Circle, which had started in early 1920s, Neurath worked as an active member of this group. Several critical discussions or debates, with which he concerned, are discussed: "protocol sentence debate", "Neurath's Boat", "Ballungen", and etc. While he was the hardest critic against all kind of metaphysical thought and preferred the Enlightenment, he was also the left wing critic against the inflexible pattern of logical empiricism. In a sense, he was a forerunner of the post-WWII science studies, which were developed by Thomas Kuhn, Paul Feuerabend and other scholars.
著者
青野 正明
出版者
桃山学院大学
雑誌
国際文化論集 (ISSN:09170219)
巻号頁・発行日
no.38, pp.39-74, 2008-07-25

This paper seeks to verify the author's theory about the logic of "State Shinto" (国家神道), whose main component was the worship of the ancestral goddess of Japan's Imperial House. Chosen-jingu (朝鮮神宮), founded in 1925, was one representative type of State Shinto, recognized as the top shrine symbolizing Ise-jingu (伊勢神宮) in colonial Korea. In the author's view, another type of State Shinto was that based on the logic of "Piety and Ancestor Worship" (敬神崇祖).In order to investigate this logic, the author analyzes the relationship between the two deities, Amaterasu-ohmikami (天照大神) and Kunitamano-ohkami (国魂大神). These were the two main deities designated for worship at the shrines promoted after 1936 to Kokuhei-shohsha (国幣小社), which ranked sixth among the nationally supported shrines. Amaterasu-ohmikami, as is well-known, is the ancestral goddess of Japan's Imperial House, while Kunitamano-ohkami was held up by the Japanese Government-General of Korea as the ancestral god of the Korean people.