文献一覧: 科学哲学科学史研究 (雑誌)

2 0 0 0 OA <Note>Inquiry into the relation between Japanese word processors and the MSX personal computer series

著者: SUZUKI Mana
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.10, pp.70-77, 2016-03-31

http://hdl.handle.net/2433/210108

2 0 0 0 IR <一般論文> アンサンブル理論と熱力学的アナロジーの系譜 : ギブスの統計力学についての一考察

著者: 稲葉肇
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.8, pp.1-20, 2014-03-31

This paper shows that JosiahWillard Gibbs (1839–1903) integrated Helmholtzian thermodynamic analogies with the Boltzmann-Maxwellian ensemble approach in his book Elementary principles in statistical mechanics (1902). On one hand, Gibbs took over the ensemble concept from Maxwell and Boltzmann, who developed it in the 1870s and 1880s. A lecture note taken by a Gibbs' student reveals that Gibbs finished his theory of statistical mechanics following the Boltzmann-Maxwell line almost completely by 1895. On the other hand, Gibbs made analogies with thermodynamics in Helmholtz's sense; in 1884 Helmholtz suggested the idea of monocyclic systems to establish the fact that there are formal and operational correspondences between mechanics and thermodynamics. In the same year, Boltzmann extended the domain of monocyclic systems by means of ensembles, but he made only formal analogies. The lecture note also mentions formal analogies. In the Elementary principles, Gibbs applied the ensemble concept to make both formal and operational analogies, as can be seen in Helmholtz. Although there is no direct evidence that Gibbs studied Helmholtz's monocyclic systems, a detailed analysis allows us to interpret Gibbs' theory as succeeding Helmholtz' thermodynamic analogies.

2016-03-05 17:26:10
2 + 1 Twitter

2012-04-02 13:48:47
2 + 0 Twitter

1 0 0 0 IR 因果的排除問題と性質の因果説

著者: 海田大輔
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: no.1, pp.37-46, 2006-03-20

2021-10-09 10:40:45
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA <サーベイ論文>量子力学の実在主義的解釈はいかにして可能か --コッヘン・シュペッカーのパラドクスの回避を中心に--

著者: 今井慶悟
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究
巻号頁・発行日: vol.15, pp.65-84, 2021-04-03

2021-05-25 08:14:00
1 はてなブックマーク

1 0 0 0 OA 医学・寄生虫学・昆虫学 : 日本における熱帯病研究の展開

著者: 瀬戸口明久
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.1, pp.125-138, 2006-03-20

2020-10-29 11:29:40
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 IR <翻訳> L・ボルツマン力学の諸原理について

著者: 稲葉肇
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: no.6, pp.121-150, 2012-02-28

2020-06-24 15:21:36
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 IR <一般論文>コンラート・ツーゼにおける計算機観--計算機械から汎用情報処理機械へ--

著者: 河西棟馬
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: no.10, pp.1-24, 2016-03-31

2019-05-03 17:24:25
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/120005741190

1 0 0 0 OA <研究ノート>ガリレオの天体観測(1)--月--

著者: 伊藤和行
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.9, pp.103-114, 2015-03-31

2019-03-09 07:04:00
1 知恵袋

1 0 0 0 OA <研究ノート>1980年代日本における家庭向パソコンと「ホームコンピュータ」

著者: 鈴木真奈
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.12, pp.91-96, 2018-03-31

2018-08-30 12:37:40
1 + 0 Twitter

http://jairo.nii.ac.jp/0019/00189407

1 0 0 0 OA <一般論文>歴史学における状況証拠による推論はいかなる時に信頼できるのか

著者: 苗村弘太郎
出版者: 京都大学文学部科学哲学科学史研究室
雑誌: 科学哲学科学史研究 (ISSN:18839177)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.12, pp.21-42, 2018-03-31

Circumstantial (indirect) evidence is supposed to be unreliable in historical research. Historians, however, sometimes succeed in establishing a fact based on circumstantial evidence. The reason why circumstantial evidence can achieve it despite its infamous reputation is a question left to be answered. I will give an answer to this question by arguing that credibility of inference in historical research does not depend on whether it is based on circumstantial evidence but on whether its hypothesis is a good explanation in terms of IBE (inference to the best explanation). McCullagh(1984) argues that there are seven explanatory virtues that concern IBE in historical research: some explanation to evidence, explanatory scope, explanatory power, plausibility, ad-hocness, disconfirmation, relative superiority. This criteria can help us understand historical inference based on circumstantial evidence, but it has some problems. Therefore, I will try to modify his criteria in terms of Bayesiansim. I will argue three points. First, plausibility should be interpreted as prior probability in terms of Bayesianism. Second, ad-hocness should be turned into a virtue reflecting degree of unification. Third, how much weight is put on each of explanatory virtues depends on individual historian’s judgement. I will demonstrate these points by a case study.