文献一覧: 北海道大学哲学会 (出版者)

6 0 0 0 OA 田口茂著『現象学という思考 : 〈自明なもの〉の知へ』

著者: 鈴木俊洋
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, pp.105-110, 2019-01-04

2019-10-06 08:43:35
6 + 6 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/75648

4 0 0 0 OA フーコーにおけるテクノロジーと倫理 : セクシュアリティの概念をめぐって

著者: 杉山吉弘
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.40, pp.65-80, 2004-07-18

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35028

4 0 0 0 OA R・M・ヘア、生き方の思考としての道徳的思考 : ウィリアムズのヘア批判に答えて

著者: 佐藤岳詩
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.44, pp.213-229, 2008-02-29

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35060

4 0 0 0 OA G・フレーゲの生涯、ならびに論理哲学探究の構成と方法

著者: 野本和幸
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.40, pp.1-28, 2004-07-18

Firstly I sketch Frege's personal history, his academic career and his publications briefly, and secondly I try to give a general outline of the structural and methodological characteristics of his investigations as a whole. One can divide Frege's logico-philosophical investigations into the three parts as follows: (A) The invention of contemporary logic, its axiomatic systematization and the development of the logicist philosophy of arithmetic. (B) Philosophy of logic. (C) Controversies with his contemporary distinguished scholars concerning psychologism, empiricism, physicalism, formalism, etc., though I do not take them up this time. Concerning (A), firstly I try to explain why Frege must constitute the higher order logic through formulating his formal language (Begriffsschrift) for the accomplishment of his logicist project. Secondly I take note of his theory of judgment/ assertion and inference, and point out its two distinctive features, i.e., (1) his priority thesis of judgment, and (2) his epistemological characterization of judgment and inference. For Frege, a judgment is the recognition of the truth (als wahr anerkennen) of the thought-content and assertion is the manifestation of a judgment with assertoric force,while an inference is the justification (Berechtigung) of the correctness of the conclusion based on its true premises. Thirdly, Frege's claim of the primacy of the sentence or the context principle, and the composition principle are Frege's methodological guiding principles of his syntactic and semantic considerations as a whole. Concerning (B): his philosophy of logic, (1) Frege will neither approve the justifiability of primitive logical laws nor definability of primitive logical terms within his Begriffsschrift. (2) In fact, Frege does not introduce distinctive model theoretic ideas such as variant domains or quantification along with domain fixing. However, Frege explicitly provides lots of semantical 'explanations (Erklärung/Darlegung)' in his ‘explanatory language (Darlegungssprache)' as metalanguage distinguished from his object language (Begriffsschrift as ‘Hilfssprache'). For example, in his main work: GGA, Frege tries to give the proofs of the meaningfulness of his primitive logical symbols, truthfulness of axioms, and the truth-preserving nature of inference-rules. (3) Frege gives further metalinguistic explanations as propedeutic concerning the basic ‘logical forms' such as‘fall-under (subsumption)' and his logical categories: objects versus concepts/functions, and his semantic distinction of sense (Sinn) and Meaning (Bedeutung). In such explanations there might be a certain anticipation of Wittgensteinian idea of ‘saying' and ‘showing'. Furthermore Frege provides meta-meta-linguistic elucidations or suggestions resorting to vivid metaphors concerning his fundamental categories of proper names versus function-signs/concept-words,o r objects versus functions/concepts, the distinction of Begriffsschrft from ordinary language, and the relationship of representation, sense and Meaning, etc. Really Frege is not only the most revolutionary logician since Aristotle, but also a distinguished man of metaphor.

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35024

4 0 0 0 書評千葉恵『アリストテレスと形而上学の可能性--弁証術と自然哲学の相補的展開』

著者: 小沢明也
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: no.38, pp.149-154, 2002

2020-06-21 00:27:39
4 + 1 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40005459309

4 0 0 0 OA サルトルにおける他者論の可能性

著者: 水野浩二
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.38, pp.1-17, 2002-07-21

2018-10-21 13:22:46
4 + 7 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/48029

4 0 0 0 OA 高田純「実践と相互人格性 : ドイツ観念論における承認論の展開」

著者: 新田孝彦
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.38, pp.155-162, 2002-07-21

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/48021

3 0 0 0 OA 倫理学における表出主義とその成否

著者: 田村圭一
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.39, pp.1-18, 2003-07-20

2023-02-08 09:12:56
3 + 4 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/48037

3 0 0 0 OA 今井道夫「思想史のなかのエルンスト・マッハー科学と哲学のあいだ」

著者: 坂井昭宏
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.38, pp.163-169, 2002-07-21

2022-09-18 23:19:56
3 + 2 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/48018

3 0 0 0 OA ウィリアムズにおける全一性と道徳的行為者性

著者: 都築貴博
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.44, pp.101-118, 2008-02-29

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35054

3 0 0 0 IR 書評熊野純彦『ヘーゲル-〈他なるもの〉をめぐる思考』

著者: 高田純
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: no.39, pp.89-96, 2003

2013-09-05 04:31:47
3 + 7 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/40005904818

3 0 0 0 OA 数学の哲学におけるシャピロの構造主義

著者: 斉藤健
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.40, pp.45-63, 2004-07-18

The aim of this paper is to examine Shapiro's structuralism in philosophy of mathematics and to show several difficulties in his structuralism. He adopts ante rem structuralism which is based upon his realism. After delineating his arguments I will point out some advantages of his structuralism, which become apparent when it is compared especially with a traditional type of mathematical Platonism. Then I will show, by using examples taken from mathematics, that there are some ambiguities in his uses of the basic notions, such as structure, system, exemplification and place. Finally I criticize his axiomatic theory of structure mainly because it relies upon too many undefined terms, and show that in his ontological views there is an underlying discrepancy between his ante rem structuralism and his set-theoretic approach to structures.

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/35026

2 0 0 0 OA 三段論法の必然性の解明 : 於・H・コーヘン「純粋認識の倫理学」

著者: 星名雪子
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.35, pp.1-19, 1999-07-18

2021-12-15 00:42:11
2 + 1 Twitter

http://hdl.handle.net/2115/48003

2 0 0 0 OA 記憶力と直観 : ベルクソン哲学における隠された「論理」について

著者: 川端繁之
出版者: 北海道大学哲学会
雑誌: 哲学 (ISSN:02872560)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.41, pp.103-120, 2005-07-17

It is common knowledge among philosophical researchers that modern philosophy began with Descartes's "cogito". And there might be no objection to calling modern philisophy "philosophy of self-consciousness". H.Bergson found his philosophical starting-point in immediate self-knowledge, "durée pure". As such we can say that his philosophy belongs to the ancestry of self consciousness philosophy. If so, a problem will arise. :What is his own contribution to philosophy? I found an answer by interpreting and extending the concept of "schéme moteur" which is found in his second main book, "Matter and Memory". The answer is a tri-structure which is composed of three moments, "actual", "virtual", and "medium". I propose to regard this structure as the archetype of signification, moreover, to extend it to the ontological principle. And I call this the "semiotic process". My intention is to give some logical form to Bergson's idea which some people often criticize as just being a metaphor. In this sense I think it can be said that "semiotic process" is another name for "élan vital". The making Bergson's "hidden logic" clearer by finding out the "semitic process" is the main theme of this paper.