著者

槇 裕輔

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.2, pp.145-155, 2007

---

Im Mittelpunkt des osterreichischen Bundesverfassungsrechts steht das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, zu den das Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz, "Gesetz vom 1. Oktober 1920, womit die Republik Osterreich als Bundesstaats einrichtet wird" (BGB1 1920/1), in den Jahren 1925 und 1929 durch zwei umfassungreiche Bundesverfassungsnovellen geandert wurde und dessen Titel das "Bundes-Verfassungsgesetz in der Fassung von 1929" ist. Eine grosse und formelle Eigenart des osterreichschen Bundesverfassungsrechts ist, daB das hat viele Rechtsquellen, die die Bundes-verfassung(B-VG) als eine Rechtsquelle des Bunderverfassungsrecht, das Bundesverfassungsgesetz(BVG), einzelne Bstimmungen eines Gesetzes als Verfassungsbestimmungen, Staatsvertrage in Verfasssunsgrang und einzelne Verfassungsbsetimmungen in Staatsvertragen sind. Zur das Verfassungsgesetz gehort das Staatsgrundgesetz vom 21. Dezember 1867, uber die allgemeinen Rechte der Staatsburger fur die im Reichsrate vertretenen Konigreiche und Lander welches in Kraft gesetzt worden ist. Und dieses Staatsgrundgesetz gilt heute noch als ein Bundesverfassungsgesetz. In dieser Abhandlung wurde ich uber die Rechtsquellen als die Eingenart der osterreichischen Bundesverfassung und eine Seite der Bundesverfassungsgeschichte betrachten.

著者

吉川 智

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.48, no.1, pp.227-237, 2011-11-15 (Released:2017-11-01)

---

When we discuss the Japanese Constitution, many people primarily take Article 9. Moreover, when discuss Article 9, Japanese people are concerned with the existence of the SDF and its significance. The Constitution holds fast to the basic principle of pacifism, but it is very clear that the SDF is the Forces even if the Japanese Government explains that it is a nonmilitary organization. There is a definite contradiction between the Government explanations and the circumstances in the SDF various activities. Japanese people passed through Hanshin-Awaji earthquake (1995) and East Japan earthquake (2011). In the two earthquakes and PKO activities, the SDF accomplished a great remarkable achievement. In this article, I will consider the Japanese national security with special reference to the particular trend of interpretation about Article 9 and the SDF.

著者

今井 直重

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.11, pp.1-3, 1975

著者

中川 淳

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.30, pp.177-178, 1994

著者

今井 直重

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.12, pp.20-30, 1976

著者

今井 直重

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.13, pp.1-12, 1977

著者

今井 直重

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.11, pp.A1-A7, 1975

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.30, pp.178-182, 1994

著者

今井 直重

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.19, pp.1-9, 1983

---

This treatise comments the limit of the revision of the constitution of a state. First of all, we must distinguish the difference between the establishment of the constitution and its revision or amendment. The constitution-making power is an absolutely unlimited power and can establish any constitution that the state wants. But different from the constitution-making power, the constitution-revising competence is necessarily restricted by the principles and inherent spirit of the positive constitution of the state. Why the reason? Because we must, first of all, know the different charactor between the constitution-making power and constitution-revis-ing competence. That is, as a famous French constitutionalist, Si-eyes, 18ct., said, constitution-making power is an unconditional, unlimited, creative power (pouvoir constituant) and cannot be limited or conditioned by any other powers. But being distinguished from this, constitution-revising competence is merely a right in the region establishied by the constitution. So, to make the point clear, I will explain the purport as follows.- (1)Constitution-making power (pouvoir constituant) is creative, original and inherent power and cannot be limited by any other powers and so it is unlimited. (2)Constitution-revising competence (pouvoir constitue) is only a right of positive law and it is only a competence and cannot be

著者

坂口 稔

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.55, no.2, pp.221, 2019 (Released:2019-10-10)

著者

西島 裕行

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.47, no.1, pp.130-141, 2010-11-15 (Released:2017-11-01)

---

Recently, social/public concern has increased with regard to problems involving traffic crime. It can be said that drunken driving is very dangerous and vicious. First of all, operating a car in itself holds the danger of causing serious injury or death to people. It is thought that one factor in this is that there are problems with applying charges of dangerous driving resulting in death or injury and with Road Traffic Law regulations. The purpose of this study, therefore, is to solve the problems concerning penal regulations for drunken driving. The study also aims to examine the state of political issues and the legislative system in Japan using as a case example a drunken-driving accident which occurred in Fukuoka in 2006.

著者

板橋 亮平

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.45, no.1, pp.103-124, 2008-11-15 (Released:2017-11-01)

---

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the different views in Rawls's The Law of Peoples from Kant's Perpetual Peace. The reason why I write this paper is that Rawls says The Law of Peoples depends on Kant's Perpetual Peace and he himself doesn't indicate the different points. First, by comparing the international law with the law of peoples, I demonstrate that there are different points as to the theoretical construction between them. Secondly, I indicate that there is a different stance as to self-defense of war between them. Thirdly, I maintain that the political that Rawls thinks of is different from the political that Kant states. Fourthly, I emphasize that the relation the international law supposes is different from the relation the law of peoples supposes.

著者

粟屋 剛

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.51, no.2, pp.257-269, 2015-08-15 (Released:2017-11-01)

---

Recently, visiting foreign countries, especially Asian countries to undergo organ transplantation has become a target of international criticism as "transplant tourism". Is it right to blame foreign patients who go to China or other parts of Asia, including Japanese patients, in order to undergo organ transplant? Is it right for them to be refused medical care after returning home? This phenomenon has been widely observed, especially in Japan. The Japanese medical establishment has adopted a kind of policy substantially forbidding patients to go to China or other parts of Asia for transplants, and also forbidding doctors to give transplant-related care to such patients. Even if the patients who go to China or elsewhere for organ transplants can be ethically blamed, is it justifiable for medical doctors to refuse to give them medical care? These issues are related but different, and should be discussed separately. For example, in the case of China, even though it's transplant policy has human rights problems with respect to death-row prisoners and Falun Gong practitioners, it does not seem right to indirectly put pressure from behind, so to speak, on patients who are in a weak position, in order to affirm the Japanese and WHO positions against Chinese transplant policy. The issue is whether it is good or not for patients in trouble to be sacrificed in order to realize a certain policy. Of course, in Japan, legally speaking, the issue may be subject to the so-called concept of "refusal of medical care". Article 19 of the Japanese Medical Practitioners Act prescribes that a doctor engaging in medical care must not refuse medical diagnosis and treatment without "a justifiable reason". It is, however, extremely doubtful whether the receipt of organ transplantation in China, or other parts of Asia constitutes "a justifiable reason". It seems that refusal of medical care to the patients who underwent organ transplants in China or other parts of Asia and returned to their countries presents a big problem of infringement of patients' human rights. The patients' human rights are an important interest of bioethics. Just as Chinese death-row prisoners, Falun Gong practitioners, etc. whose organs are extracted, and Southeast Asian donors who donate their organs for money due to poverty, have human rights, patients who go to foreign countries because they are not able to undergo organ transplants in their own countries also have human rights. If the former are weak under the power of the state, the latter are weak in the face of the power of the medical establishment. If the concept of "humanity" applies here, it also applies there. If ethics is used as a weapon for attacks, it may also be turned to the user of the weapon. Can we tell the patients to sit and wait for death? Leaving the patients in the lurch is not true ethics.

著者

橋本 大二郎

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.53, no.2, pp.233, 2017 (Released:2017-11-01)

著者

松永 光雄

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.49, no.2, pp.39, 2013 (Released:2017-11-01)

著者

塚本 孝

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.50, no.1, pp.146, 2013 (Released:2017-11-01)

著者

大見 サキエ

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, no.2, pp.221, 2016 (Released:2017-11-01)

著者

長尾 英彦

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.44, no.1, pp.121-132, 2007

---

1. Anfangs 2. Tatsachenkontext 3. Entscheidungen 4. Untersuchung (1) Besonderheit des Wasserunternehmens (2) Inwieweit kann die "Zuschlagsgebuhr" zugelassen werden? Gibt es der prufungsmassstab? (3) Justizprufung zur "Gemeindeverordnung" (4) Eigentliche Aufgabe der Justizprufung 5. Schlusswort

著者

照屋 信治

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.40, no.1, pp.1-16, 2003-11-05 (Released:2017-11-01)

---

The purpose of this study is a) to categorize the thought and events of Okinawa in the Meiji period, and b) to examine the historical position of Ryukyu Education (1895-1906) published by Association of Okinawan Private Education. Results of recent research in colonial studies and the framework for analysis of assimilation are adopted in this study. The term 'Kouminka' has been used carelessly in the existing study of modern Okinawan history. Ambiguous use of 'Kouminka', which has expressed some basic aspects of Okinawa, makes it almost impossible for us to understand those thought and events precisely. Well organized and strict discussion on modern Okinawan history can be made by using results of recent research in colonial studies and the framework for analysis of assimilation. Very few attempts have been made at such examination. This study has a significance in reexamining the framework for the thought on modern Okinawan history.

著者

築山 欣央

出版者

日本法政学会

雑誌

法政論叢 (ISSN:03865266)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.39, no.1, pp.94-105, 2002-11-15 (Released:2017-11-01)

---

In modern society, the scene where a state participates in freedom of expression positively is seen not infrequently. For example, there is support about exhibition of a fine-arts worek, and subsidy aiming at promotion of media art, such as a movie. In oder to promote expression, when the assistance and the support by the state are made, by law, to a receiver, conditions are attached oe selection by the state is made from two or more proposers. Traditional Freedom of expression principle has been chiefly aimed at the positive regulation by the state.For example, they are penal regulations or prior restraint. However, how should the relation between freedom of expression and state be considered by assistance which is not so? This report introduces the argument in the court case and the theory in the United States, and considers the problem of Government-Funded Speech.