著者

善積 京子

出版者

追手門学院大学人間学部

雑誌

追手門学院大学人間学部紀要 (ISSN:13418084)

巻号頁・発行日

no.1, pp.159-178, 1995-12-20

---

スウェーデン / 法律婚 / 同棲 / ホモセクシュアル

著者

善積 京子

出版者

追手門学院大学

雑誌

追手門学院大学社会学部紀要 (ISSN:18813100)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.3, pp.169-191, 2008

---

子どもの最善 / 共同養育権 / 養育規程 / 家族法事務所 / スウェーデン

著者

善積 京子 ヨシズミ キョウコ

出版者

追手門学院大学地域創造学部

雑誌

追手門学院大学地域創造学部紀要;Bulletin of the Faculty of Regional Development Studies, Otemon Gakuin University (ISSN:24238449)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.179-207, 0000

---

家族政策 / 家族政策研究 / 子育て政策 / 日本型福祉 / 男女共同参画社会

著者

善積 京子

出版者

関西社会学会

雑誌

フォーラム現代社会学 (ISSN:13474057)

巻号頁・発行日

no.4, pp.66-74, 2005-05-28

---

近代婚姻制度では、婚姻と性と生殖の〈三位一体〉制度がとられ、子どもを産み・育てるという再生産機能は婚姻内だけに期待され、親子関係は婚姻関係と結びつけられ、嫡出推定によって法的な父親が定められる。先進諸外国では近年、同棲・婚外出産・離婚・ひとり親家庭や再婚家庭が増え、人間の再生産機能は婚姻家族だけでなく多様な形態の家族によって遂行されるようになる。子どもの人権尊重やライフスタイルへの中立性の視点から、家族法が改正され、「嫡出・非嫡出子」の概念が取り除かれ、「嫡出推定」「嫡出否認」の制度は廃止される。親の婚姻関係を超えて父子関係が形成され、離婚後も共同親権が認められる。一方日本においては、婚前の性関係は一般的になるものの、嫡出性の規範が支持され、「婚姻-生殖」の結合関係が維持される。日本では、法的親子関係がいかに婚姻制度を軸にして展開されているかを、親の婚姻関係の有無で異なる父子関係の形成、嫡出推定の排除方法、国際婚外子の国籍、非婚の父の出生届、離婚後の単独親権や養育責任追及制度から検討し、その問題点を明かにする。

著者

善積 京子

出版者

大手前大学・大手前短期大学

雑誌

大手前女子短期大学・大手前文化学院研究集録 (ISSN:09103767)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.4, pp.43-47, 1980

著者

善積 京子

出版者

北ヨーロッパ学会

雑誌

北ヨーロッパ研究 (ISSN:18802834)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.6, pp.71-81, 2010 (Released:2018-10-01)

---

スウェーデンの1998年の養育規定改正で、「子どもの最善」 を最優先することが謳われ、一方の親が異議を唱えても共同養育権の判決が可能となる。2006年改正では、共同養育できる両親の能力や子どもの被るリスクへの留意を規定する。2004-05年の地方裁判所の養育訴訟の事例分析から、養育権訴訟では3 段階の判断プロセスがあり、 そこで‹養育者適性›や‹現状維持›の原則の作用を明らかにした。また、居住訴訟では‹安定化・ 現状維持› ‹子どもの意向尊重› ‹きょうだい同居› の原則、面会訴訟では‹規則的面会設定› ‹リスク回避› ‹子どもの意向尊重› ‹性同一化のモデル› の原則を析出した。「子どもの最善」 の学術的知見が流動的である今日的状況において、「子どもの最善」の「法システム」 内での一貫性は担保されず、 養育判決は社会環境に強く影響を受けている。判決ではジェンダーに公平であり、母親ないしは父親により厳しい基準を設けているわけでない。

著者

善積 京子

出版者

日本家族社会学会

雑誌

家族社会学研究 (ISSN:0916328X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.14, no.2, pp.43-53, 2003-01-31 (Released:2009-08-04)

参考文献数

13

---

近年欧米諸国では, 恋愛結婚, 婚外の性交・出産の排除, 法律婚主義, 性別役割分業という特徴をもつ〈近代結婚〉が, フェミニズム・性解放・子どもや同性愛者の人権の視点から批判される。個人単位化されているスウェーデンでは, 性別役割分業体制否定, 婚姻の有無を基準にしない性モラル, 異性間の同棲関係の制度化, 同性間カップル関係の制度化, 婚外子差別の撤廃, 婚姻外の親子関係の確定および養育責任追及の制度化という, 新しい婚姻制度に変容する。婚姻登録の個人的意義は, 経済面における法的権利の保証, 情緒的きずなの確認・強化にあり, さらにパートナー登録では, 「結婚」としての意味, パートナーの配偶者としての公表, 相手の姓使用の意義が加わる。未来社会では, 婚姻制度が遂行してきた父親確定の機能は, DNA鑑定技術の普及により父親確定制度で代替可能となり, また性愛関係の特権化の機能も親密な関係性の変容により不要になるかもしれない。

著者

善積 京子

出版者

社会学研究会

雑誌

ソシオロジ (ISSN:05841380)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.27, no.3, pp.45-73,145, 1983

---

This paper is an attempt to study how illegitimate children were born and reared. The investigation deals with 396 illegitimate children entrusted to one child guidance clinic.<br> Firstly these cases were classified into three groups, according to the mothers' feelings for their children at birth, and then the backgrounds of the illegitimate births were examined. The first group contains those who wanted neither to bear nor to rear their children; the second group those who wanted to bear them legitimately, and the third group, those who dared to bear their child illegitimately. In the first group, illegitimacy is caused partly by social factors, such as condonation of rape and the lack of sexual education, and partly by in dividual factors such as ignorance, lack of intelligence, poverty, and unconscious needs. In the second group, illegitimacy is directly caused by the prevention of marriage by, for example, the irresponsible behaviour of the mother's partner, disruptive intervention by relatives or over-expectation of marriage system in Japan and the norm of legitimacy has a great deal to do with causing illegitimacy.<br> Secondly four fostering patterns were introduced regarding the others' intention to foster their children and their actual behaviour. Factors affecting the rearing of illegitimate children can be divided on three levels: first, social structure-the norm of legitimacy and social resources : second, social relationships such as those with the child, father, kin, and the new partner; and capacity to foster, and her health.

著者

山田 昌弘 善積 京子

出版者

社会学研究会

雑誌

ソシオロジ (ISSN:05841380)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.1, pp.197-204, 1998-05-31 (Released:2016-11-02)

著者

善積 京子

出版者

日本家族社会学会

雑誌

家族社会学研究 (ISSN:0916328X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.5, no.5, pp.59-65,140, 1993-07-25 (Released:2009-08-04)

参考文献数

11

被引用文献数

1

---

In recent years, an increasing number of people in Europe and the United States are choosing to live together, i.e. to cohabit, rather than legally get married, and are discoveing the advantages of this arrangement. Traditionally, cohabitaion was not a choice but a forced lifestyle for those who were not allowed a legal union.This paper first cited some statistics, such as the increase in the number of divorces, the decrease in the number of marriages, the increase in the number of cohabitations, and the increase in the number of births out of wedlock, as a way to depict the current so-called “crisis in the marital system” in Western Societies.Secondly, after analyzing the social background which has led to this increase in cohabitation, people living together are categorized into three groups : young people, women seeking independece, and people seeking an alternative to remarriage. Their process of choosing cohabitation as their lifestyle, from the point of view of strategy, is also explained.Thirdly, the paper examines Swedish society where cohabitation is not only accepted as a socical institution but also legal. Through examining the Swedish example, social conditions which enable “neutrality” of lifestyle and a new paradigm for the family is investigated.Finally, the possibilty of cohabitation being chosen as a lifestyle in Japan in examined.

著者

善積 京子

出版者

社会学研究会

雑誌

ソシオロジ (ISSN:05841380)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.27, no.3, pp.45-73,145, 1983-01-31 (Released:2017-02-18)

---

This paper is an attempt to study how illegitimate children were born and reared. The investigation deals with 396 illegitimate children entrusted to one child guidance clinic. Firstly these cases were classified into three groups, according to the mothers' feelings for their children at birth, and then the backgrounds of the illegitimate births were examined. The first group contains those who wanted neither to bear nor to rear their children; the second group those who wanted to bear them legitimately, and the third group, those who dared to bear their child illegitimately. In the first group, illegitimacy is caused partly by social factors, such as condonation of rape and the lack of sexual education, and partly by in dividual factors such as ignorance, lack of intelligence, poverty, and unconscious needs. In the second group, illegitimacy is directly caused by the prevention of marriage by, for example, the irresponsible behaviour of the mother's partner, disruptive intervention by relatives or over-expectation of marriage system in Japan and the norm of legitimacy has a great deal to do with causing illegitimacy. Secondly four fostering patterns were introduced regarding the others' intention to foster their children and their actual behaviour. Factors affecting the rearing of illegitimate children can be divided on three levels: first, social structure-the norm of legitimacy and social resources : second, social relationships such as those with the child, father, kin, and the new partner; and capacity to foster, and her health.

著者

善積 京子

出版者

Japan Society of Family Sociology

雑誌

家族社会学研究 (ISSN:0916328X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.5, no.5, pp.59-65,140, 1993

---

In recent years, an increasing number of people in Europe and the United States are choosing to live together, i.e. to cohabit, rather than legally get married, and are discoveing the advantages of this arrangement. Traditionally, cohabitaion was not a choice but a forced lifestyle for those who were not allowed a legal union.<BR>This paper first cited some statistics, such as the increase in the number of divorces, the decrease in the number of marriages, the increase in the number of cohabitations, and the increase in the number of births out of wedlock, as a way to depict the current so-called "crisis in the marital system" in Western Societies.<BR>Secondly, after analyzing the social background which has led to this increase in cohabitation, people living together are categorized into three groups : young people, women seeking independece, and people seeking an alternative to remarriage. Their process of choosing cohabitation as their lifestyle, from the point of view of strategy, is also explained.<BR>Thirdly, the paper examines Swedish society where cohabitation is not only accepted as a socical institution but also legal. Through examining the Swedish example, social conditions which enable "neutrality" of lifestyle and a new paradigm for the family is investigated.<BR>Finally, the possibilty of cohabitation being chosen as a lifestyle in Japan in examined.