著者
山森 亮
出版者
経済理論学会
雑誌
季刊経済理論 (ISSN:18825184)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.41, no.2, pp.28-37, 2004-07-20 (Released:2017-04-25)

Esping-Andersen's influential analysis for de-commodification is one of powerful conceptualization of need fulfillment under modern capitalism. Feminists' critique against his analysis and his effort to reply to these criticisms has contributed to the academic enquiry for "the welfare state and family". In his response, Esping-Andersen introduced concept of de-familialization. I discuss both consepts (de-commodification and de-familialization) have two analytically distinct contents; say, Polanyian de-commodification (policies for maintenance of commodification), and Esping-Andersenian de-commodification(policies beyond such a institutional rationality); De-familialization for maintenance of family, and De-familialization beyond such a institutional rationality. I argue both latter contents are crucial if we consider both concept as "emancipatory potential", as Esping-Andersen wrote. I also argue his conceptualizing de-familialization is problematic because it means eventually commodification. We could recognize really existing both latter contents and de-familialization beyond his conceptualization, in terms of "moral economy".
著者
山森 亮
出版者
経済理論学会
雑誌
季刊経済理論 (ISSN:18825184)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.41, no.2, pp.28-37, 2004-07-20

Esping-Andersen's influential analysis for de-commodification is one of powerful conceptualization of need fulfillment under modern capitalism. Feminists' critique against his analysis and his effort to reply to these criticisms has contributed to the academic enquiry for "the welfare state and family". In his response, Esping-Andersen introduced concept of de-familialization. I discuss both consepts (de-commodification and de-familialization) have two analytically distinct contents; say, Polanyian de-commodification (policies for maintenance of commodification), and Esping-Andersenian de-commodification(policies beyond such a institutional rationality); De-familialization for maintenance of family, and De-familialization beyond such a institutional rationality. I argue both latter contents are crucial if we consider both concept as "emancipatory potential", as Esping-Andersen wrote. I also argue his conceptualizing de-familialization is problematic because it means eventually commodification. We could recognize really existing both latter contents and de-familialization beyond his conceptualization, in terms of "moral economy".
著者
小沢 修司 山森 亮 平野 寛弥 堅田 香緒里 鎮目 真人 久保田 裕之 亀山 俊朗 小林 勇人 村上 慎司 村上 慎司
出版者
京都府立大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2009-04-01

本研究は、研究者と市民のネットワーク形成から生み出された議論を通じて、ベーシック・インカムに関する三つの目的を総合的に検討した。第一に、生存権・シティズンシップ・互酬性・公共性・フェミニズム思想といったベーシック・インカムの要求根拠を明らかした。第二に、ベーシック・インカムに関する政治的・財政的実現可能性を考察した。第三に、現行の年金や生活保護のような所得保障制度の問題点とベーシック・インカムにむけた改良の方向性を議論した。