著者

岡 洋樹

出版者

内陸アジア史学会

雑誌

内陸アジア史研究 (ISSN:09118993)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, pp.111-119, 2007-03-31 (Released:2017-10-10)

著者

岡 洋樹

出版者

公益財団法人 史学会

雑誌

史学雑誌 (ISSN:00182478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.98, no.12, pp.2027-2028, 1989-12-20 (Released:2017-11-29)

著者

岡 洋樹

出版者

公益財団法人 史学会

雑誌

史学雑誌 (ISSN:00182478)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.97, no.2, pp.145-176,279-28, 1988-02-20 (Released:2017-11-29)

---

Under Ch'ing 清 rule, most of the Mongolian tribes were organized under the Cirulran-qosiru system or league-banner system. But the three necessary conditions of establishment of qosiru, that is, the organization of sumun and qamjilr-a, the supply of pasture for qosiru and the appointment of jasar, meant radical change for the existing Mongol order and especially meant bureaucratization of Mpngolian noyans. Concerning pasture land, this system meant delimitation of qosiru's pasture. So it is very difficult to imagine the introduction of this system into Mongolia taking place within a short time. This paper discusses when the pasture's delimited border was established among the Qalq-a Mongols. In the case of the Qalq-a Mongols, it is said that this system was introduced at the conference of Dolun narur in 1691 or the 30th Year of Emperor K'ang-hsi 康煕. But the objective conditions of the Qalq-a in 1691 could not have permited such radical reforms. This is because they had been fleeing to Southern Mongolia from the invasion of Γaldan Bosurtu qaran since 1688. Γaldan died in 1697 and the Qalq-a Mongol returned to Outer Mongolia, but the Ch'ing dynasty took a prudent attitude in compelling a delimited qosiru border on the Qalq-a, because of their cooperation in the struggle against Cewengrabdan's Jegun rar force. Moreover the Ch'ing dynasty could not border their pasture, which often moved because of an unstable military balance between Jegun rar and the Ch'ing force. Although the defeat of Jegun rar by the Ch'ing conquest during 1755-1757 cleared all obstacles to compulsory establishment of this system all over Qalq-a, the Ch'ing government continuously took care because of Qalq-a resistances, for example the rebelion of Cinggunjab or the movement for secession from Ch'ing rule to Russia. For this duration, pasture was regulated by the Qalq-a Mongol nobles, not by imperial authority. Such conditions often gave rise to trouble between the Ch'ing government and Qalq-a nobles. A typical example was the request for extension of pasture land from Qalq-a nobles as well as from Cenggunjab, the lieutenant general of Uliyasutai. Such conditions were finally settled by the delimitation of ayimar's border by Batu, who was delegated by the emperor for this mission in 1781 or the 46th year of emperor Ch'ien-lung 乾隆. Soon after Batu's delimitation, banner's border was also delimited. I can therefore presume that the delimited banner's border was established soon after 1781 or the 46th year of emperor Ch'ien-lung. Furthermore, I can say that the Cirulran-qosiru system was substantially established after this time, and not at the conference of Dolun narur in 1691.

著者

岡 洋樹 Hiroki OKA

出版者

島根県立大学北東アジア地域研究センター

雑誌

北東アジア研究 (ISSN:13463810)

巻号頁・発行日

no.3, pp.95-109, 2017-09

著者

王 満特〓 岡 洋樹訳

出版者

東北大学

雑誌

東北アジア研究 (ISSN:13439332)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.8, pp.25-44, 2004-03-19

---

論文

著者

岡  洋樹

出版者

東洋史研究会

雑誌

東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.69, no.4, pp.679-688, 2011-03

著者

岡 洋樹 高倉 浩樹 北川 誠一 黒田 卓 木村 喜博

出版者

東北大学

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2007

---

旧ソ連圏に属したモンゴル、ウズベキスタン、アゼルバイジャン、グルジア、ロシア連邦サハ共和国について、社会主義期から体制崩壊後の歴史記述・認識とその教育面への反映の状況を、収集した文献と、現地研究者との協力を通じて比較検討することによって、相互の共通性と特色を解明する。とくにソ連圏崩壊後に各国で顕著な民族主義的歴史記述や教育が創出している歴史認識の特徴と社会主義期との継承関係を解明する。