著者

松山 直樹

出版者

兵庫県立大学

雑誌

商大論集 (ISSN:02862174)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.65, no.3, pp.23-64, 2014-03

著者

松山 直樹 Naoki Matsuyama 兵庫県立大学経済学部 School of Economics University of Hyogo

出版者

兵庫県立大学神戸商科キャンパス学術研究会 ; 1949-

雑誌

商大論集 = Journal of University of Hyogo (ISSN:02862174)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.65, no.3, pp.333-374, 2014-03

著者

松山 直樹

出版者

北海道大学大学院経済学研究科

雑誌

經濟學研究 (ISSN:04516265)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.62, no.3, pp.177-206, 2013-02-21

---

This is a Japanese translation of 'Was the Austrian School a "Psychological" School in the realm of Economics in Carl Menger's view?' was published by Gilles Campagnolo in the volume he edited: Carl Menger: Neu erörtert unter Einbeziehung nachgelassener Texte / Discussed on the Basis of New Findings (Frankfurt/Main: Peter Lang, 2008)

著者

岩垣 真人 楠山 研 牧野 邦昭 松山 直樹

出版者

沖縄大学

雑誌

基盤研究(C)

巻号頁・発行日

2020-04-01

---

本研究では,京都帝国大学や,県立兵庫高等商業学校,琉球大学などに着目し,まず,そのような高等教育機関が,どういった経緯で,既存の高等教育機関に対抗して設立されたのか,検討を行う。さらにそれらの高等教育機関において,対抗関係と特殊な事情の下で掲げられた,教育・研究に関する理念が,現実との関係のなかでどのように変容していったのか,分析を行う。この研究では,帝国大学などを軸とした「国策」に基づく高等教育機関の設置やその発展とは異なる,全国各地で地域のニーズに応じて設置・運営された後発の高等教育機関像を並列することで,日本における高等教育機関の複線的記述を一層拡張することを試みていく。

著者

黒田 耕嗣 松山 直樹

出版者

一般社団法人 日本数学会

雑誌

数学 (ISSN:0039470X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.1, pp.91-105, 2007 (Released:2011-01-14)

参考文献数

24

著者

松山 直樹

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.2, pp.56-74, 2018 (Released:2019-09-02)

---

Abstract: The aim of this study is to shed light on the unknown tradition of Marshallʼs ethical notion of ʻeconomic chivalry,ʼ then inherited by A. C. Pigou, F. Y. Edgeworth, and J. M. Keynes. At the beginning, this work argues that while Marshall actually regretted not being able to indicate the practical aspects of economic chivalry in his speech in 1907, the point was later discussed by other contemporary economists. Specifically, in his public lecture, Pigou suggested that all employers should be guided by a spirit of economic chivalry, in order to built the facilities where young workers could have an opportunity to train physical and mental abilities. Then, Edgeworth regarded economic chivalry as a philosophical foundation for his economic wel-fare analysis, in which female workers should be treated equally to male ones, with the wage level determined only by productivity, not by gender differences. It is for this reason that he also pointed out the necessity of a subsidy to families. Finally, Keynes believed that, in the interwar period, the British economy could not recover only through the effort of chivalrous businessmen, who attempted to harmonise public interest and personal gain. The reason is that he negatively considered chivalrous businessmen, defining them a ʻtarnished idolʼ in busi-ness practice at the time. Nevertheless, Keynes also argued the importance of setting the wage level based on fairness and reasonability. Overall, these distinguished economists evaluated Marshallʼs idea of economic chivalry within the laissez-faire doctrine both positively and negatively. JEL classification numbers: A 13, B 13.

著者

松山 直樹

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.55, no.2, pp.120-121, 2014 (Released:2019-11-28)

著者

松山 直樹

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.55, no.2, pp.54-72, 2014 (Released:2019-08-23)

被引用文献数

1

---

This paper addresses the relativity of ‘chivalry’ and ‘fair wage’ in both Alfred Marshall’s eco-nomics and Thomas Carlyle’s works. Particular-ly, it is well-known that Marshall’s theory of economic growth has two core notions: ‘standard of life’ and ‘economic chivalry,’ but only the lat-ter has not always been considered as an eco-nomic notion. In order to define the theoretical implication of ‘economic chivalry,’ it is impor-tant to associate the ‘economic chivalry’ with the economic concept of ‘a fair rate of wage’ that is one of the fundamental conditions of economic growth. The reason is that the common signifi-cance of both concepts is to make sure of the sense of the word ‘fair’ on employment under the economic freedom. In the meantime, it must be noted that Carlyle’s Past and Present (1843), which propounded the ‘Captains of Industry’ to improve upon the condition of economic free-dom as ‘laissez-faire,’ also illustrates the relativi-ty of ‘chivalry’ and ‘fair wage.’ This paper, hence, shows that Marshall’s ‘economic chivalry’ and ‘a fair rate of wage’ has the philosophical similarity with Carlyle’s ‘chivalry of labour’ and ‘fair wage’ principle. Moreover, the paper also demonstrates that there exists an ideological consistency be- tween Marshall’s ‘A Fair Rate of Wages’ (1887) and his ‘Social Possibilities of Economic Chiv-alry’ (1907). JEL classification numbers: B 13, B 31, J 30.

著者

松山 直樹

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.53, no.2, pp.110-111, 2012 (Released:2019-10-30)

著者

松山 直樹

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.51, no.2, pp.51-67, 2009 (Released:2019-08-08)

参考文献数

59