著者

桑原 慎二郎 硴崎 貞雄 樋口 英登 高橋 慶吉 山地 正城

出版者

公益社団法人 日本マリンエンジニアリング学会

雑誌

日本舶用機関学会誌 (ISSN:03883051)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.20, no.2, pp.165-170, 1985-02-01 (Released:2010-05-31)

---

The Koyo Maru, the most advanced cable layer owned by the NIPPON TELEGRAPH & TELEPHONE PUBLIC CORP., incorporates latest technological achievements into her design; Here two systems, ACNAS (Advanced Cable-ship Navigation Aid System) and MICOS (One-man Control System), are reported in details as her typical automatic system.(1) ACNAS intends to combine and unite the various information such as design route, positioning, course record, target vessel data, degital map and data of cable laying and burying. This system achieved the mechanization of cable laying and burying and data recording works.(2) According to the change of ship modes (Rest, Stand-by, Work, Navigation), MICOS controls sequentially main engine, auxiliary machines and valves.These systems realized the remarkable improvement of accuracy, sure operation and labor-saving for cable laying works.

著者

高橋 慶吉

出版者

一般財団法人 日本国際政治学会

雑誌

国際政治 (ISSN:04542215)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2021, no.202, pp.202_15-202_30, 2021-03-29 (Released:2022-03-31)

参考文献数

60

---

In the field of American diplomatic history, the 1930s is depicted as an era of isolationism. It is true that the United States did not actively engage in the international efforts to maintain both the Versailles system in Europe and the Washington system in the Asia-Pacific region. However, American diplomacy in the 1930s was neither dormant nor unproductive. It successfully fulfilled some important achievements in the Western Hemisphere by vigorously developing the so-called Good Neighbor Policy toward Latin American countries.The architect of the Good Neighbor Policy was Sumner Welles, the Assistant Secretary of State for Latin American affairs from 1933 to 1937 and Under Secretary of State from 1937 to 1943. Welles is also known for the central role he played in formulating the postwar plans of the State Department during the Second World War.By using Welles’ private papers that previous studies rarely consult, this paper examines the kind of international order Welles sought to realize in the Western Hemisphere. Before Welles joined the Roosevelt administration in 1933, the United States had made military interventions in Latin American countries repeatedly and imposed high tariffs on their commodities. Welles observed that the military interventions settled political confusion in Latin American countries only temporarily and the high tariffs prevented them from achieving economic prosperity, which Welles regarded as the fundamental factor for a sustainable stability of the society. In addition, Welles thought that the military interventions and the high tariffs induced Latin American enmity toward the United States, making it difficult for Washington to make the Western Hemisphere the solid foundation supporting American leadership in the world.Based on those observations, this paper argues, Welles tried to modify the American tariff policy and establish an inter-American conference system to manage internal and external threats to the American republics. In other words, Welles sought to create a new hemispheric order characterized by two principles: promotion of trade and joint action to keep peace in the region. Welles’ endeavors were successful and enabled the Western Hemisphere to have, in Welles’ words, “the most advanced, and at the same time the most practical, form of regional system” in the world. This paper concludes that the hemispheric system not only supported the American war efforts during the Second World War but also impacted the postwar visions created by Welles and his group as a model that other regions should follow.

著者

田中 仁 許 衛東 宮原 曉 山田 康博 堤 一昭 秋田 茂 青野 繁治 片山 剛 三好 恵真子 今泉 秀人 大谷 順子 竹内 俊隆 高橋 慶吉 木村 自 思 沁夫 西村 成雄 丸田 孝志 江 沛 許 育銘 周 太平 李 朝津

出版者

大阪大学

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2008

---

(1)統合後の大阪大学における現代中国研究の部局横断的プラットフォームとして、中国文化フォーラムを改組した。(2)中国南開大学・台湾東華大学との研究セミナーの共同開催をふまえて、東アジア学校間交流の定例化をめざした。(3)『大阪大学中国文化フォーラム・ディスカッションペーパー』を刊行した。(4) 本研究の成果を、時間軸・社会空間軸・日中関係軸の三部構成とし、各部で歴史学と諸ディシプリンとの対話を提示する『共進化する現代中国研究』としてとりまとめた。