著者
Yasuaki Takeji Hiroki Shiomi Takeshi Morimoto Yutaka Furukawa Natsuhiko Ehara Yoshihisa Nakagawa Takao Kato Junichi Tazaki Eri Toda Kato Hidenori Yaku Yusuke Yoshikawa Tomohisa Tada Michiya Hanyu Kazushige Kadota Tatsuhiko Komiya Kenji Ando Takeshi Kimura CREDO-Kyoto PCI/CABG Registry Cohort Investigators
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.CJ-19-0980, (Released:2020-01-29)
参考文献数
31
被引用文献数
1

Background:The effect of diabetes mellitus (DM) status on the long-term risk for heart failure (HF) in patients undergoing coronary revascularization has not been adequately evaluated.Methods and Results:In this study, 15,231 patients who underwent coronary revascularization in the CREDO-Kyoto Registry Cohort-2 were divided into 2 groups according to DM status (DM group: n=5,999; Non-DM group: n=9,232). The DM group was further divided into 2 groups according to insulin treatment (insulin-treated DM [ITDM]: n=1,353; non-insulin-treated DM [NITDM]: n=4,646). The primary outcome measure was HF hospitalization. The cumulative 5-year incidence of HF hospitalization was significantly higher in the DM than non-DM group (11.0% vs. 6.6%, respectively; log-rank P<0.0001), and in the ITDM than NITDM group (14.6% vs. 10.0%, respectively; log-rank P<0.0001). After adjusting for confounders, the increased risk of HF hospitalization with DM relative to non-DM remained significant (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–1.67, P<0.0001), whereas the risk associated with ITDM relative to NITDM was not significant (HR 1.17, 95% CI 0.96–1.43, P=0.12).Conclusions:The adjusted long-term risk for HF hospitalization after coronary revascularization was significantly higher in DM than non-DM patients, regardless of revascularization strategy, but did not differ between ITDM and NITDM patients.
著者
Yasuaki Takeji Tomohiko Taniguchi Takeshi Morimoto Naritatsu Saito Kenji Ando Shinichi Shirai Genichi Sakaguchi Yoshio Arai Yasushi Fuku Yuichi Kawase Tatsuhiko Komiya Natsuhiko Ehara Takeshi Kitai Tadaaki Koyama Shin Watanabe Hirotoshi Watanabe Hiroki Shiomi Eri Minamino-Muta Shintaro Matsuda Hidenori Yaku Yusuke Yoshikawa Kazuhiro Yamazaki Masahide Kawatou Kazuhisa Sakamoto Toshihiro Tamura Makoto Miyake Hisashi Sakaguchi Koichiro Murata Masanao Nakai Norio Kanamori Chisato Izumi Hirokazu Mitsuoka Masashi Kato Yutaka Hirano Tsukasa Inada Kazuya Nagao Hiroshi Mabuchi Yasuyo Takeuchi Keiichiro Yamane Takashi Tamura Mamoru Toyofuku Mitsuru Ishii Moriaki Inoko Tomoyuki Ikeda Katsuhisa Ishii Kozo Hotta Toshikazu Jinnai Nobuya Higashitani Yoshihiro Kato Yasutaka Inuzuka Yuko Morikami Kenji Minatoya Takeshi Kimura on befalf of the CURRENT AS Registry Investigators and K-TAVI Registry Investigators
出版者
The Japanese Circulation Society
雑誌
Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.CJ-19-0951, (Released:2020-02-01)
参考文献数
35

Background:There are no data comparing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) with surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) outcomes in real clinical practice in Japan.Methods and Results:We combined 2 independent registries, the K-TAVI Registry (a 6-center prospective registry of consecutive patients who underwent TAVI) and the CURRENT AS Registry (a large, 27-center registry of 3,815 consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis [AS]). In the K-TAVI Registry, 338 patients underwent TAVI with SAPIEN XT balloon-expandable valves from October 2013 to January 2016, whereas in the CURRENT AS Registry 237 patients with severe AS underwent SAVR from January 2003 to December 2011. Propensity score matching was conducted, with final cohort comprising 306 patients. The cumulative 2-year incidence of all-cause death and heart failure (HF) hospitalization did not differ significantly between the TAVI and SAVR groups (13.7% vs. 12.4% [P=0.81] and 7.9% vs 3.9% [P=0.13], respectively). After adjusting for residual confounders, there were no significant differences between the TAVI and SAVR groups in the risk for all-cause death (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.35–1.58; P=0.43) or HF hospitalization (HR 1.27; 95% CI 0.40–4.59; P=0.69).Conclusions:These findings from 2 independent Japanese registries suggest that the 2-year risk of all-cause mortality and HF does not differ significantly between TAVI and SAVR groups in real-world practice in Japan.