著者

坂口 [コウ]吉

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.34, no.1, pp.91-110, 1961-07

---

In 1277, Robert Kilwardby, archbishop of Canterbury, pronounced at Oxford, the-condemnation of some Aristotelian theses including Thomist theory of unity of forms. In 1284, his successor, John of Peckham ratified his enactment. The aim of this article is to show the reason why these two archbishops issued such prohibitions against St. Thomas, one of the greatest Christian thinkers It is certain that the two archbishops thought that the theory of unity of forms threatened the traditional interpretation on dogmas on the creation and the body of Christ. But they did not ask the sanction of papal court before announcing this prohibition. So, it can be said that on the part of Roman curia, the Pope did not give any suggestion to the archbishops in issuing this condemnation. Therefore, the two archbishops are fully responsible on their action. However, they issued the condemnation not only in accordance with their personal judgement, but they followed the atmosphere of Christian world in which there were still many Augustinians. In those days circles of prelates were totally Augustinians and anti Thomists. These Augustinians were seriously concerned of the new pagan elements in the world of Christian thoughts. The enactment of Kilwardby and Peckham is the reflection of this atmosphere in the Christian world. But it is to be regretted that they failed to grasp, the situation of Thomism which was spreading rapidly in the world of Christian thought and which was adopted by the Dominican order, one of the most important supporters of the papacy, as their official opinions. If they had known better about this situation before issuing their condemnation, they would have been more careful. Their condemnation caused a serious discrepancy among the Christian world which resulted in the disintegration of medieval Christendom.

著者

平山 栄一

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.35, no.2, pp.211-226, 1962-12

---

間崎万里先生頌寿記念Those who carried out the coup d'etat of Brumaire (November, 9-10) 1799, declared the establishment of the provisional government of the Consuls and started drafting of the new constitution. The ideas of Sieves, one of the members of the revolutionary group and the theorist of it, were adopted as the foundation of the constitution. However, Napoleon Bonaparte interfered with the work of the drafting committee and proceeded to revise the draft so as to make it fit to his purpose. Thus the Constitution of the Year VIII came into being on December 13th with the signatures of the committee members and was later approved by the national plebiscite according to the provision of the constitution. The new constitution, unlike the earlier ones, does not have in the preamble any declaration of rights and consists of only 95 articles. It is briefer than any of the preceding ones, and contains, among others, provisions for the rights of citizenship, the Senate, the legislative power, the government, the courts, and the responsibilities of public functionaries etc. The executive power resides in the three Consuls, the First Consul being entitled to the right of promulgating laws, and appointment and dismissal of officials, civil and military, and remaining two Consuls being only entitled to consultative voice. The members of the legislatures, and all the public officials central and departmental, were all elected by the people formally. Thus the ideals of Sieyes who had, under the principle of the sovereignity of people, tried to prevent the dictatorship by dividing powers, crumbled before the intervention of Napoleon Bonaparte and came to be even utilized by him for his purpose.

著者

高瀬 弘一郎

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.42, no.3, pp.305-336, 1970-02

著者

河北 展生

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.56, no.3, pp.p263-276, 1986-11

---

論文

著者

松本 信広

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.48, no.4, 1978

---

批評と紹介

著者

恒松 安夫

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.5, no.2, pp.277-294, 1926-05

著者

吉田 小五郎

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.24, no.2, pp.252-290, 1950-10

---

福澤諭吉五十年忌記念

著者

真下 英信

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.51, no.3, pp.154-161, 1981-12

---

批評と紹介

著者

三上 朝造

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.50, pp.489-503, 1980-11

---

西洋史第五〇巻記念号

著者

石神 裕之

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.69, no.3, pp.503-540, 2000-05

---

一 はじめに二 出土泥面子の概要三 出土泥面子の考古学的分析 (1) 出土遺跡および数量の把握 (2) 泥面子の形態分析 (3) 泥面子の年代決定 (4) 汐留遺跡における面打の出土地点四 文献史料にみる面打と賭博の関係 (1) 面打の用途 (2) 文献史料に見る「キズ」の流行 (3) 大名屋敷における人口動態五 まとめ

著者

周 一川

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, no.1, pp.161-186, 1997-09

---

はじめに一 留学生は聴講生として対処された東京女高師二 留学生特設予科を設置した奈良女高師三 留学生特別措置がなかった東京高等糸学校おわりに

著者

神崎 直美

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.72, no.2, pp.139-165, 2003

---

論文はじめに1 天保期萩藩の徒刑創設構想2 慶応三年山口藩の「罪人仕役」の採用3 明治初年の徒刑おわりに[参考資料]萩藩・山口藩の徒刑史料

著者

樋口 勝彦 吉田 小五郎

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.23, no.4, pp.1(397)-22(418), 1949-06

---

特輯ザビエル研究

著者

太田 次男

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.45, no.4, pp.1-42, 1973-10

---

論文

著者

田辺 三千広

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.2, pp.197-212, 1985-03

---

論文はしがき第一章 教会の祈祷について。父なる神に栄光あれ第二章 食物と飲物についての神の書からの話第三章 共同食卓(трапеза)で話をすべきでないことについて第四章 衣服と履物についての聖なる書物からの話第五章 聖なるイコンと書物について,それをいかに所有すべきかという神の書からの話

著者

漆原 徹

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, no.1, pp.107-129, 1997-09

被引用文献数

2

著者

湯川 武

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.44, no.1, pp.89-95, 1971-10

---

特集東西交渉史

著者

稲葉 沙智子

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.73, no.1, pp.131-132, 2004

著者

前嶋 信次

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.36, no.4, pp.421-451, 1963-12

---

序言一 中国伝来の事情二 古代日本人とテリアカ三 中東地方での受け入れ四 アラブ医家の伝えたその製法In the Annals of T'ang dynasty, we see the mention about the envoy of Fu-lin Kuo, ordinarily identified with the Byzantine Empire, who came to Chang-an and presented "Ti-Yeh-Ch'ieh" to the then Emperor of China. The late Prof. F. Hirth thought-that the Ti-Yeh-Ch'ieh should be the theriaka (theriac, treacle) which is a very famous antidotal drug invented by a certain Greek physician in the 2nd century. We can find in various Chinese documents prior to the date of the above mentioned envoy of Fu-lin country the name of this medicament. For example, in "Shin-hsiu-pentsao" (New Materia Medica), compiled in 659 A. D., we read that this thing was a drug of the far western countries and foreign people brought it to China from time to time. In Japan, the oldest existent book which contains the record concerning the theriaka is "I-hsin-fang" written in 980 A. D. by Tamba-no-Yasuyori. On the other hand, it is not difficult to find out many articles relating to "tiryaq", theriaka, from among the Islamic literary works. Through these materials, we should be able to make clear in detail the prescription of this antidote and to know how it was and is still popular in the Middle East society. In Japan, the theriaka was introduced again since the 16th century by the Europeans. The writer thinks that the historical study of the diffusion of this kind of medicine is not only interesting from the standpoint of folklore, but it will be able to contribute to clarify the currents of cultures between the East and the west.

著者

藤木 健二

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.82, no.3, pp.77(313)-106(342), 2013-09 (Released:2013-00-00)

---

論文挿表 はじめに一 イスタンブルへの靴革供給と遠隔地商人二 靴革商組合の組織と役員三 イスタンブルにおける靴革の流通と価格四 靴革不足の影響と対応おわりに