著者

赤松 清和

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.20, no.2, pp.65(251)-83(269), 1941-11

著者

田中 荊三

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.35, no.2, pp.185-210, 1962-12

---

間崎万里先生頌寿記念The Three-power conference was held at Potsdam between Winston Churchill for Great Britain, President Truman for the U.S.A., and Marshal Stalin for the U. S. S. R., to determine the future of Germany after defeated, and to fulfil the contracts of Yalta, for the ordinary diplomatic negotiations could not solve these problems. First of all, the conference provided a committee of foreign ministers, and the political principles to be followed towards defeated Germany. These problems and the economic principles were determined easily. They made effort to have the concrete solution of the details, but it was very difficult, because the disagreements between the Western allies and the Soviets had deepened. Especially, the former had felt that the Soviet's requests -to keep the security of socialists states- were imperialistic and the Western allies was eagered to check that requests. At last they entrusted the solutions of the details to the committee of the foreign ministers which was weaker than that conference in the power of solving the problems. In spite of the economic principle of the conference, that economically Germany should be only one unit the committee determined the devided administration of Germany, which became the important cause of the cold war.

著者

和田 博徳

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.31, no.1, pp.692-719, 1958

---

慶應義塾創立百年記念論文集The 神器譜 or the Record of the Sacred Machines written by Chao Shih-chen 趙土禎 of the Ming period, tells various matters about fire-arms. He stated in his work that the Lu-mi gun was the best weapon among the fire-arms of those days. The word " Lu-mi" 〓密 is no doubt the Lu-mi that was introduced as 魯迷 (Lu-mi) in the 明史 (The History of Ming Dynasty) and means the Ottoman Empire as presumed by Bretschneider in his article "Mediaeval Researches from Eastern Asiatic Sources." However, the question is that how the fire-arms were introduced to China by the Othmans. According to the Ming shih lu (the Authentic Record of Ming Dynasty), the Lu-mi 魯迷 paid tribute to the Chinese Court in the 16th century. At that time, the Ottoman Empire was at its zenith under Suleiman the Magnificent, and the might of his Empire even reached as far as Europe. It is possible, therefore, that the Othmans could introduce their fire-arms such a distance as -China. It must be a mention-able fact that the Othman- Turks introduced firearms to the eastern country by land through the highway-the Silk Road- competing with the Portuguese who came to the Far East by sea from the south with their fire-arms.

著者

武田 勝藏

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.16, no.3, 1937-11

---

書評

著者

武田 勝藏

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.18, no.1, pp.183-184, 1939-09

---

書評

著者

木村 宗吉

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.3, pp.465-503, 1970-12

---

一 はじめに二 タイ文史科と従来の諸研究三 呉氏の墓碑と神主四 若干の問題五 おわりにIt is well-known that a large number of Chinese left their native land and emigrated to the Southeast Asian countries, largely due to the upheavals associated with the transition from the Ming dynasty to the Ch'ing. However, it has recently been noted that such Chinese refugees or their descendants were not only engaged in trade, commerce and so forth, but also that some of them attained political power in Southeast Asian countries from the latter half of the 17th century to the latter half of the 18th century. Among these, Dr. Chen Ching-ho noticed in his article that Mac-〓玖 of-Ha-tien 河仙, Chen Chao 鄭昭 in Siam, Lo Fang-po 羅芳伯 of Pontianak in western Borneo and Wu Jang 呉譲 of Songkhla in the Malay Peninsular region of present-day Thailand were contemporaries who were supported by groups of their fellow Cantonese, Teochiu, Hakka and Fukien countrymen, respectively. Of these four men, the first three have already been the object of considerable scholarly research. But so far, little research has been done on Wu Jang. Wu I-lin 呉翊麟 was the first man to make an on-the-spot investigation of the tombstones and Shen-chu 神主, or ancestral tablets, of the Wu family, and he proposed a new theory regarding the family line on the basis of this investigation and various Thai records; the details may be found in Sung-k'a Chih 宋〓誌, or the Topography of Songkhla, by Wu I-lin (published in Taipei in 1968). The author of the present article also investigated the tombstones and ancestral tablets of the Wu family at Songkhla in August of 1969, compared his own observations with those of Wu I-lin, and noticed certain problems. According to Phongsawadan Muang Songkhla, or the Chronicle of Songkhla, by Phraya Wichiankhiri (Chom-the eighth of the Wu family governors of Songkhla), Wu Jang emigrated to Songkhla from Fukien Province in 1750. He worked in and around Songkhla as a vegetable gardener, fisherman, and merchant, and won favor with the populace of Songkhla. In 1767, Ayutthaya, the capital, was captured and sacked by Burmese invaders. Subsequently, Cheng Chao, or Phraya Taksin, repelled the Burmese invaders, proclaimed himself King of Siam, and established a new capital at Thonburi. At that time, only the central part of Siam came under his influence, the other part being controlled by the former royal family or retainer of the Ayutthaya dynasty. In 1769, King Taksin mounted an expedition to Nakhon Sithammarat and Songkhla, and consolidated his power in the south. In recognition of the loyal services of Wu Jang during this period, King Taksin appointed him excise officer for swallow's nests on two islands in Songkhla Lake, enobled him with the title of Luang, and took his third son back to the capital as a royal page. Wu Jang was an efficient tax farmer and regularly remitted the annual revenues to the capital. In 1775, King Taksin duly rewarded his loyalty and ability by appointing him governor of Songkhla. Wu Jang survived the change of dynasties in 1782, and served as a governor until his death. Subsequently, the governorship of Songkhla was passed on by hereditary succession until the eighth governor retired in the reign of Rama the fifth of the present dynasty. It is a noteworthy fact that an overseas Chinese and his descendants maintained local political power for such a long period, i. e., about one hundred and twenty years. The author examined the twenty-one tombstones and six ancestral tablets mentioned by Wu I-lin, referring also to Thai records. The author found that the tombstone No. 19 listed by Wu I-lin did not, in fact, belong to the Wu family. The author also felt that, in certain cases, there was insufficient evidence to identify the particular members of the family to whom some of the Wu tombstones belonged. The author observed that the personal names in Chinese characters found on the tombstones or ancestral tablets can be divided into three categories: (1) True Chinese names, that is, Wu Jang, his sons' names, most of his grandsons' names, etc. (2) Transliterations of Thai names: for example, Mien 綿 (Fukienese pronunciation: Min), the name of the sixth governor, is merely a transliteration of his Thai name, Men, and his brother's name, Sheng 省 (Fukienese : Sieng) is also a transliteration of his Thai name, Saeng. (3) Combinations of the tzu-pei 字輩, or the Chinese character used to distinguish the different generations (Each member of any given generation has the same character in his name, so that his position in the genealogical tree can be determined), and the transliteration of the Thai name: for example, Hsiian Lieh 宣列 (Fukienese: Soan Liet), the name of the first son of Men, is a combination of 宣 which is the tzu-pei of the fifth generation of this family, and the transliteration of his Thai name, Net; the names of all his brothers are also composed in this manner. The above-mentioned examples are merely a few among the many in this category. Generally speaking, from the great-grandchildren of Wu Jang downward, Thai names occur with increasing frequency. Wu Jang and his group came to Songkhla from China as agricultural emigrants during the last period of the Ayutthaya dynasty, when Siam was in chaos. Since Wu Jang was appointed governor of Songkhla, his family and descendants were dedicated servants of the successive Thai kings, and various titles were conferred upon them. Consequently, the Wu family were rapidly assimilated into Thai society, although part of the Wu family did attempt to preserve their Chinese cultural heritage. It seems that in general, assimilation was already well under way in the days of Wu Jang's great-grandchildren, and the Chinese cultural identity of the family eventually disappeared. Finally the author sincerely hopes that the tombstones of the Wu family will be restored as soon as possible, since some of them are already in ruins. The author wishes to express his gratitude to Dr. Chen Ching-ho of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, who offered valuable suggestions and guidance, regarding Fukienese pronunciation; to Mr. Tan Yeok-seong, who lives in Singapore and supplied valuable information; to Professor Chin You-di, the Head of the Archaeological Section of the National Museum in Bangkok, and Mr. Arphorn Na Songkhla (a descendant of Wu Jang) of the Conservation Laboratory of the National Museum in Bangkok, who supplied valuable information; to the venerable Mr. Phraya Aphirak Ratchautthayan, the third son of the eighth governor of Songkhla, who lives in the suburbs of Songkhla city and permitted the author to inspect and photograph the ancestral tablets; and to Mr. Suchat Rattanaprakan, who also lives in Songkhla and offered a great deal of useful advice concerning the investigation of the tombstones in Songkhla. However, the author himself must assume sole responsibility for the opinions expressed in the present article, and for any errors which may appear therein.

著者

吉田 小五郎

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.27, no.2, pp.245-296, 1954

---

私は曩に、本誌第二十四巻第二・三合併號に「草創時代の幼稚舎」と題し、明治七年から同二十五年に至る舎史の大要を述べた。今回は、それに引きつゞき、明治二十五年以降大正八年に至る期間を假に「前期幼稚舎」と名づけ、その概要を記すことゝした。私が特に「前期幼稚舎」と呼ぶのは、この期間の主任者が何れも福澤先生の息のかゝつた人々であり、從つて舎内の空氣に福澤先生が溶けこみ生きてゐたかに思はれる。從つて其の後、即ち大正八年以降の幼稚舎とは明確に区別して然るべしと考へたからである。然し一貫した「幼稚舎史」の一部としては極めて不完全なもの故、「稿」の一字を添えて發表することにした。猶ほこゝでは將來通史を編む場含當然省略せらるべき基礎的な史料を幾つか「附録」として添えることゝした。本稿でも前例に倣ひ、福澤先生の外は一切敬称を省略した。

著者

森岡 敬一郎

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.24, no.1, pp.100-110, 1949-10-01

著者

今宮 新

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.35, no.1, pp.1-20, 1962-06

---

第二章 日普条約締結の研究 第三節 プロシャの遣日使節派遣準備(三)(遣日使節の出発) 第四節 日普修好通商条約の締結

著者

浅香 正

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.77, no.4, pp.395-439, 2009-03

---

講演録

著者

清水 潤三

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.48, no.3, pp.p227-232, 1977-10

---

論文

著者

尾崎 貴久子

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.87, no.3, pp.61(285)-88(312), 2018-02

---

はじめに第一章 十・十一世紀の医療批判と女性の医療第二章 十三世紀の女性の医療第三章 十四世紀の女性医療者おわりに論文

著者

佐志 伝

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.1, pp.351-370, 1970-05

---

一 はじめに二 母の感化三 漢学の系譜四 功利主義五 不可知論六 福沢の宗教今宮新先生古稀記念

著者

中井 信彦

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.20, no.1, pp.181-183, 1941-07

---

書評

著者

有馬 成甫

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.12, no.2, pp.181-216, 1933-05

---

一 鐵砲の初傅來二 異説の一, メンデス・ピントの記事三 異説その二, 雜説四 異説その三, 長沼賢海博士の説五 異説その四, シャビエルと鐵砲六 異説その五, 大友宗麟と鐵砲

著者

和田 正彦

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.62, no.1, pp.165-183, 1992

著者

松平 年一

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, no.1, pp.14-29, 1943-09

---

(一) 寫經司系以外の官寫經所 一 寫經所 二 寫一切經司 三 外島院寫經所 四 奉寫寳積經所 五 中島寫經所 六 大和國寫經所 七 奉寫 御執經所 八 奉寫一切經司 九 春宮坊寫經所(二) 官寫經所の故紙利用

著者

長谷部 史彦

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.72, no.3, pp.441-456, 2003

---

論文はじめに一 一五〇六年五月,ダマスクスにおける住民の運動二 一五七一年六月,カイロにおける知識人たちの運動三 一七五一年五月,アレッポにおける女たちの抗議行動四 アズハル・モスクのムジャーウィルたちによる抗議行動 (1) 一七七七年六月 (2) 一七八五年一二月五 アズハル・モスクにおけるフサイニーヤ地区住民の運動 (1) 一七八六年三月 (2) 一七九〇年一〇月まとめと考察

著者

山本 英政

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.62, no.4, pp.519-540, 1993

---

一 はじめに二 ボストン・ブラーミンと移民問題三 ロッジの南・東欧系移民問題四 識字テスト条項の論議五 むすびにかえてI have long been interested in the history of Japanese immigration to the United States and even more particularly in the question of how the Japanese were, in 1924, eventually excluded by U. S. federal law from immigrating there. In this connection I have also had an interest in Henry Cabot Lodge, a congressman from Massachusetts whose support of this exclusionary policy was decisive in its becoming law. In this paper, however, I discuss the related issue of his racial attitudes towards Slavic and Latin nationals immigrating to the U.S. At the turn of the Twentieth Century, the influx of laborers from southeastern Europe became a major issue in the urban, industrial areas of the northeastern United States. Among those who feared that this influx would lead to a national crisis was Henry C. Lodge. As a lawmaker, he attempted to reduce the number of those arriving by frequently introducing bills that would restrict immigration by the use of "Literacy Tests". This paper attempts to clarify the factors leading Lodge to favor the anti-immigration policy. It also focuses on the enthusiastic battles waged by Lodge in Congress to enact such legislation during the terms of three presidents, who considerd the measure discriminatory and sought to stop its passage with their veto authority. It is my hope that this study will add not only to the general understanding of the history of U.S. immigration policy, but also that it will be of interest to historians concernd with Henry C. Lodge in the above mentioned context.

著者

松本 芳夫

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.21, no.3, pp.1(281)-58(338), 1943-06