文献一覧: 経済学史学会 (出版者)

2 0 0 0 OA 柳澤治『資本主義史の連続と断絶―西欧的発展とドイツ』日本経済評論社, 2006, xi+360頁

著者: 小林純
出版者: 経済学史学会
雑誌: 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.49, no.2, pp.92-93, 2007-12-25 (Released:2010-08-05)

2 0 0 0 OA 藤本建夫『ドイツ自由主義経済学の生誕―レプケと第三の道』ミネルヴァ書房,2008,xix+564+23 頁

著者: 小林純
出版者: 経済学史学会
雑誌: 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.51, no.2, pp.122-123, 2009 (Released:2019-08-08)

2 0 0 0 OA ブレンターノ, ルーヨ著, 石坂昭雄・加来祥男・太田和宏訳『わが生涯とドイツの社会改革―1844~1931』ミネルヴァ書房, 2007, x+543+16頁

著者: 柳沢のどか
出版者: 経済学史学会
雑誌: 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.50, no.2, pp.107-108, 2009-02-05 (Released:2010-08-05)

2 0 0 0 OA ドイツ自由主義経済学における市場と福祉 W. レプケの社会経済思想をめぐって

著者: 藤本建夫
出版者: 経済学史学会
雑誌: 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.52, no.2, pp.63-82, 2011 (Released:2019-08-20)

The “welfare” of a nation and the “welfare state” should be considered separately. Various economic and social ideas were born during the interwar period and the war. One of these was the welfare state theory against the Nazis state. W. Beveridge, a Keynesian economist, discussed the “welfare state” from the premises of an effective, state-controlled economy. In Germany, the liberalist group of the anti-Nazis prepared for the theoretical core of social economics( social market economy) for the after-war period, which was not only opposed to the Keynesian state and economy but also criticized the Hayekian fundamentalism of the market economy. One of the leading theoreticians, W. Röpke, found preconditions for the more human and affluent economic society in the competing market economy and the decentralization( subsidiarity). In rising productivity, the diligent and saving workers and the “conform state interventions” are capable of creating a humane economic society. Röpke’s way of thinking harmonized with Catholic doctrines. On Reconstruction of the Social Order( Pius XI, 1931) was an extremely important document for him. Politically, it justifies the decentralization by stating that the greater association should be assigned to subordinate organizations. In terms of the worker-employer relationship, the worker shares ownership or management in that the worker contract can be modified by a partnership contract. Here, the welfare of workers will rise, though the state does not take care of individual workers like Beveridge Plan. This is also the Röpke’s goal of “welfare.” JEL classification numbers: B 25, I 31, P 46.