著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

東洋文庫

雑誌

東洋学報 = The Toyo Gakuho (ISSN:03869067)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.99, no.1, pp.01-017, 2017-06

---

Tārīkh al-dawla al-Atābakīya mulūk al-Mawṣil li-Ibn al-Athīr (Ms. ARABE 1898, Paris) is the only extant manuscript recognized as Ibn al-Athīr’s dynastic history titled al-Tārīkh al-bāhir fi al-dawla al-Atābakīya. Based on this manuscript De Slane published a revised edition in 1876, and then in 1963 Ṭulaymāt published a newly revised edition. Currently the latter is mainly utilized for research as an improved version of De Slane’s edition. In his work, Ṭulaymāt improved the technical inadequacy of De Slane’s edition and refuted (or ignored) De Slane’s claim of the existence of additions to the manuscript in later eras. Focusing on this point, the author of this article examined the descriptions of the manuscript and compared the two editions based on the same manuscript to make clear its contents and the later additions. For verification, since no other manuscript of al-Bāhir has been found, the author utilized as comparative materials two historical texts, Abū Shāma’s Kitāb al-Rawḍatayn and Ibn Qādī Shuhba’s al-Kawākib al-Durrīya, which include many quotations from al-Bāhir. As a result of the close examination, the author selected for detailed textual criticism two chapters, Chap. 97 and Chap. 133, which were suspected of being added to the original text in a later era. Chap. 97 is the chapter which De Slane had considered it as an addition, while Ṭulaymāt did not. The author examined the description and confirmed the authenticity of De Slane’s argument. As for Chap. 133, to which both editors paid no particular attention, the author pointed that its description was possibly not from Ibn al-Athīr’s text, but added from Abū Shāma’s text, by comparing the texts and checking the word “qultu” (= I said) in the texts, which indicated the description was not a quotation.As a result of the examination, the author concluded that the manuscript was supposed to contain some complements from the descriptions which were left in the form of citations by other historical materials which have gone missing.

著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

東洋史研究会

雑誌

東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.75, no.2, pp.379-348, 2016-09

著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.71, no.2, pp.283-314, 2002

---

論文はじめに第一章 ザンギー朝成立の背景 : ザンギーI世時代(521-41/1127-46年) 1 ザンギーI世とセルジューク朝スルターン 2 ザンギーI世とその近臣たち第二章 サイフ・アッディーン・ガーズィーI世時代(541-44/1146-49年) 1 ザンギーI世暗殺(541/1146年) : 二政権成立まで 2 兄弟会合(541/1146年)の意義 : 序列の確立 3 サイフ・アッディーン・ガーズィーI世優位の確立 : 三つの事件から 1 ルハー再征服(541年ジュマーダー第二月/1146年10-11月) 2 ザンギーI世暗殺犯の逮捕(541年ジュマーダー第二月18日/1146年11月24日) 3 ダマスカス救援(543/1148年)第三章 クトゥブ・アッディーン・マウドゥード時代(544-65/1149-70年) 1 序列の逆転 : スィンジャール事件(544/1149年) 2 セルジューク朝スルターンとの関係の変化 : バグダード包囲からスライマーン・シャー即位まで 3 両政権の接近 : モスル政権の援軍派遣 4 クトゥブ・アッディーン体制の変化 : 近臣たちの後退第四章 サイフ・アッディーン・ガーズィーII世の即位(565-69/1170-74年) 1 ヌール・アッディーンのモスル進軍(566/1171年) 2 ヌール・アッディーンのモスル入城 : あらたな主従関係の成立むすび

著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.81, no.4, pp.43(575)-65(597), 2013-01

---

論文はじめに第一章 ヒドゥマの成立と履行第二章 ヒドゥマの解消第三章 ヒドゥマの維持おわりに

著者

ハルドゥーン イブン 中村 妙子 柳谷 あゆみ 佐藤 健太郎 五十嵐 大介

出版者

早稲田大学イスラーム地域研究機構

雑誌

イスラーム地域研究ジャーナル (ISSN:1883597X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.8, pp.64-91, 2016

著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

東洋史研究会

雑誌

東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.75, no.2, pp.379-348, 2016-09

---

This article deals with the reign of the Zangid ruler of Syria, Nur al-Din Mahmud (r. 541-569 AH/1146-1174AD) and attempts to analyze his policies towards his amirs who played important roles in the government and army. For this purpose, the author collected and organized information on individual amirs from contemporary documents, including their official positions, movements, iqta' (i. e. fiefs), and families, and confirmed trends in their activities and analyzed their participation in internal government affairs, which has not been dealt with in depth in previous studies. In the management of his amirs, Nur al-Din took account of an amir's family, its ties with others and internal order, not only of the amir himself. He emphasized the notion of "service of the family" by assuring transfer of a deceased amir's iqta' to his son (even if the son was still in his minority) and punishing the amir's family for the amir's misdeeds. He aimed to strengthen his leadership by adjusting the amir's family order in accord with his relationship with his amirs based on their service to the master. Nur al-din never had an amir killed for posing a threat to his reign but usually dealt with the unsettling matters by adjusting the amirs' positions and situations, for example, changing their iqta', or forcing them to participate in expeditions. His policies towards the amirs seems to have been effective in keeping the amirs and the soldiers in their charge in support of the regime by avoiding sudden, unreasonable executions. This rational order was based of the political and military steadiness of his regime. Occasionally, Nur al-Din was obliged to compromise with ambitious or disruptive amirs out of military necessity as in a series of battles against the Franks (Crusaders). Because of such circumstances and the fact that the amirs also could move to keep their independence within the framework of their services to their master, Nur al-Din faced a leadership crisis at the end of his reign. This is confirmed by the actual independence of the Ayyubids in Egypt who still operated within the framework of service to Nur al-Din.

著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

三田史学会

雑誌

史學 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.81, no.4, pp.575-597, 2013-01

著者

柳谷 あゆみ

出版者

東洋文庫

雑誌

東洋学報 : 東洋文庫和文紀要 (ISSN:03869067)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.99, no.1, pp.118-91, 2017-06