著者

根岸 隆

出版者

日本学士院

雑誌

日本學士院紀要 (ISSN:03880036)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.65, no.1, pp.75-91, 2010 (Released:2017-04-05)

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

日本学士院

雑誌

日本學士院紀要 (ISSN:03880036)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.62, no.1, pp.81-97, 2007-09

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

経済学史学会

雑誌

経済学史学会年報 (ISSN:04534786)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.45, no.45, pp.78-85, 2004 (Released:2010-08-05)

参考文献数

22

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

日本経済学会

雑誌

季刊 理論経済学 (ISSN:0557109X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.23, no.1, pp.19-27, 1972-05-20 (Released:2008-02-28)

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

The Japanese Society for the History of Economic Thought

雑誌

経済学史学会年報 (ISSN:04534786)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.38, no.38, pp.59-65, 2000 (Released:2010-08-05)

参考文献数

33

---

Two articles published in the Japanese Economic Review (in English) are summarized as recent examples of my studies in the history of economics. A mathematical model based on the quantity theory of money and the labor value theory of money is constructed in “Japanese Studies of Ricardo's Theory of Foreign Trade” (1996), which can justify Kojima's numerical examples (1951) to insist on the determination of the terms of trade in Ricardian theory. “Unequal Exchange and Exploitation” (1998) denies the possibility of exploitation through international trade, which is insisted by Marx and Marxian economists, by the proper comparison of values differently dated.

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

The Japanese Society for the History of Economic Thought

雑誌

経済学史学会年報 (ISSN:04534786)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.28, no.28, pp.48-49, 1990 (Released:2010-08-05)

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

東洋英和女学院大学

雑誌

東洋英和大学院紀要 (ISSN:13497715)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.1-12, 2005-04-01

---

We defended Marshall from modern economic theorists' false accusation that he forgot producers' surplus in his proposition of the tax-subsidy scheme. After due attention is paid to Brahmananda's pioneering contribution, we argued, firstly, that Marshall did not forget producers' surplus but merely considered the case of no producers' surplus, in view of his distinction between the supply curve and the particular expenses curve and the long-run nature of the equilibrium considered. In addition to this purely theoretical vindication (rational reconstruction), we argued further more, from the view point of the history of economic thought, that Marshall did not forget producers' surplus in The Pure Theory, which was aimed at specialist readers, but deliberately assumed it away in Principles, which was aimed at more general readers. Finally, in view of the recent rapid development of the theoretical and applied general equilibrmm theory, we emphasize the role of Marshallian particular equilibrium analysis as a heuristic method.

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

関西学院大学

雑誌

經濟學論究 (ISSN:02868032)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.42, no.3, pp.61-66, 1988-10-15

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

日本学士院

雑誌

日本學士院紀要 (ISSN:03880036)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.67, no.2, pp.61-74, 2013-02

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

日本学士院

雑誌

日本學士院紀要 (ISSN:03880036)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.57, no.1, pp.17-40, 2002 (Released:2007-06-22)

参考文献数

46

被引用文献数

1

---

In Negishi (1986), I developed my view on the so-called Mill's recantation of the wages fund doctrine, the short-run theory of wages in the classical school of the economics. According to a survey article on the recent John Stuart Mill interpretations, “a further twist to the debate has been given by Negishi (1986). He reminds us that Mill, in the 1871 edition of the Principles, retracted some of his earlier enthusiasm for Thornton. There he in effect rejected the idea that disequilibrium trades in any way undermine the importance of the principle of the equality of supply and demand, and cautioned that it was too early to adduce any firm conclusions from the discussion engendered by Thornton's book”(De Marchi, 1988).I have three purposes in this present article. The first one is to offer a Japanese version of Negishi (1986), which I think it worthwhile, since there are still no Japanese translation available of the related literature referred and quoted there, i. e., Thornton (1869), Mill (1869) and Thornton (1870). Secondly, I wish to record the appearance of some related literature published in 1990's, like Ekelund (1997), Forget (1991), Fukagai (1995), Mawatari (1997), Mirowsky (1990), Negishi (1998), Vint (1994), and White (1994). Particularly, I wish to make some detailed rejoinders to comments given by Mawatari (1997).The final one is to consider, from the point of view of the modern economic theory (Arrow and Hahn (1971), pp. 324-346, and Negishi (1972), pp. 207-227), how Mill should have replied to Thornton, who asked the significance of a small amount of trade at equilibrium prices, which are arrived after a great bulk of goods were already sold at disequilibrium prices (Thornton, 1869, pp. 53-54; 1870, p. 65). As is easily seen at a glance at Figures 6, 7 and 8 in the text of the present article, i. e., those of box diagram and of utility frontier, the importance of the final small amount of trade at equilibrium prices is that the Pareto optimality is assured.

著者

根岸 隆

出版者

日本學士院

雑誌

日本學士院紀要 (ISSN:03880036)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.3, pp.199-210, 2005-03

著者

根岸 隆之

出版者

青山学院大学

雑誌

若手研究(A)

巻号頁・発行日

2008

---

本研究では内分泌撹乱化学物質のヒトにおけるリスク評価、特に神経発達影響のリスク評価について有用な情報を提供するためにカニクイザルを用いた神経発達影響評価系の確立を試みた。まず、カニクイザルの神経発達を分子生物学的に評価した結果、生後直後から60日にかけて急激に発達することを明らかにした。また、この時期に甲状腺ホルモンを欠乏させると抑制性神経伝達システムの発達が妨げられることを明らかにした。加えて影響評価に適したカニクイザル胎仔由来神経系細胞の培養法を確立した。