著者
原山 智 大藪 圭一郎 深山 裕永 足立 英彦 宿輪 隆太
出版者
Japan Association for Quaternary Research
雑誌
第四紀研究 (ISSN:04182642)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.42, no.3, pp.127-140, 2003-06-01 (Released:2009-08-21)
参考文献数
46
被引用文献数
11 16

飛騨山脈の隆起については,鮮新世後期から更新世初頭(2.7~1.5Ma)にかけて,最初の極大期があったとする点では,多くの研究者の意見が一致している.しかし,その後の第四紀の期間にテクトニックな隆起があったかどうかでは,意見が分かれていた.山麓の堆積物から隆起時期を推定する方法では,山脈の隆起がテクトニックなのか,アイソスタティックなのか,判定困難なため,本研究では飛騨山脈,爺ヶ岳一帯に分布する鮮新世後期~前期更新世の火山岩類の構造を解析した.この結果,これらの火山岩類はコールドロンをなしており,東に70°前後傾動していることが判明した.南方の高瀬川流域や槍穂高連峰での資料を加味すると,前期更新世後半(1.3Ma~)以降,飛騨山脈東半部の広い範囲で,東西圧縮場のもとでの挫屈による傾動・隆起を生じていることが明らかとなり,飛騨山脈の2段階にわたるテクトニックな隆起運動が明らかとなった.
著者
足立 英彦
出版者
東京大学大学院教育学研究科
雑誌
東京大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13421050)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.54, pp.303-312, 2015-03-31

The need for intervention to prevent psychological maladaptation among university students is increasing. To provide support for as many students as possible, it is desirable that the intervention can be offered in the lecture. Besides the existing programs targeted at automatic thoughts, another form of intervention should be sought to facilitate the change in negative schemata, which are thought to generate automatic thoughts. This paper focuses on Role Lettering (letter writing technique) as a candidate for such intervention and reviews the outcome research on it to discuss its possibilities and problems in application to the psychoeducational lecture in universities.
著者
足立 英彦
出版者
日本法哲学会
雑誌
法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2003, pp.157-166,229, 2004-10-20 (Released:2008-11-17)
参考文献数
17

Gustav Radbruch (1878-1949) presented his famous formula under the direct influence of 12 years of National Socialism. It reads: “Where there is not even an attempt at justice, where equality, the core of justice, is deliberately betrayed in the issuance of positive law, then the statute is not merely ‘false law’; it completely lacks the very nature of law.” Many scholars claim that this proposition differs from the legal philosophy expressed in his earlier works. I will argue that his legal philosophy has commonly been misinterpreted in such a way that it is apparently inconsistent with this proposition, and that when correctly interpreted, it supports the proposition. The reinterpretation presented in this paper is based on two arguments. The first concerns Radbruch's concept of law. Many scholars believe that Radbruch developed his concept of law with reference to Heinrich Rickert's “value-reference”, according to which any false statute is acknowledged as “law”. However, I will argue that Radbruch developed this concept under the guidance of Emil Lask's teleological principle. The second argument concerns Radbruch's theory about the purposes of law, and his closely interrelated notion of relativism. I will present a manuscript that Radbruch wrote for his lecture at the University of Kiel in 1919 (Gustav Radbruch. Rechtsphilosophische Tagesfragen [Current Questions of Legal Philosophy]. Ed. Hidehiko Adachi and Nils Teifke. Nomos-Verlag: Baden-Baden 2004). In this manuscript, Radbruch gave preference to what he called the “transpersonal view”, in which personality values and collective values (i. e., the values of nations) are subservient to work values. However, he added to this the argument that personalities and nations are at the same time the precondition of any true community of work. In addition, relativism, from which standpoint he developed his theory before 1919, is critically described in this paper. Pursuant to this, I will maintain that his legal philosophy after 1919 should be reinterpreted as non-relativistic and that, as argued in his proposition, any statute that completely denies one of three given values is non-law.