著者
小寺 初世子
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
no.4, pp.p1-44, 1981

During the World War II, Japan commandeered over one million Koreans, people of one of the former Japan's colonies, to make them work in Japanese military factories and mines. When Japan surrendered to the Allied Forces, Korea was pledged to be conferred independence in due course. Those Korean workers who were emancipated from forced labour by Japan's capitulation were in a great hurry to go back to their home country to be independent soon. At this time, for some reasons nobody knows, they left Japan with arrears of wages due to them to be paid by factories where they worked. There seem to have been some conflicts between factories and Koreans or the Association of Koreans. In accordance with the advice of the Japanese Government, many factories deposited the claimed arrears of wages due to Korean workers in deposit offices of Japan. Over 30 years have passed since then. Even today, it seems, to this writer, that the deposited money has never been reimbursed to former Korean workers who are duly entitled to receive it. This fact means that those Korean people, who suffered from commandeering and forced labour have not received the arrears of wages of over 30 years ago. This sounds to be entirely unfair. Nevertheless, from legal point of view, all procedures in regard to the deposit of the arrears of wages due to Korean workers had been made without any fault. Yet, we can not but feel some sense of unfairness in this case. In this paper, the writer tries to analyse the whole process of the case of unpaied wages of Korean workers. It is a sincere hope of this writer that this study will be of some help to find a way to give rescue for those Korean people who are victims of this complicated case.
著者
横畑 泰志 横田 昌嗣 太田 英利
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU研究報告シリ-ズ (ISSN:13425935)
巻号頁・発行日
no.42, pp.307-326, 2009-03
被引用文献数
1

松尾雅嗣教授退職記念論文集 平和学を拓く
著者
大石 悠二
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
no.13, pp.p101-122, 1990

United Nations Security Council Resolution 242 was adopted by unanimous vote on November 22, 1967, in order to settle problems in the aftermath of the Fourth Middle East War (the so-called Six Day War) in which Israeli armed forces occupied vast areas of Arab territory-the West Bank of the Jordan River and the Gaza Strip in Palestine, the Golan Heights in Syria, and the Sinai Peninsula in Egypt. The historic U. N. resolution, stressing 'inadmissibility of the acquisition of territory by war' and 'the need to work for just and lasting peace' in the Middle East, called for withdrawal of Israeli armed forces from occupied territories and the tacit recognition of the State of Israel by the Arab states which had advocated the eradication of the Zionist state from the political map since the First Middle East War of 1948. Resolution 242 has long been regarded as a starting point for the peaceful settlement of the Arab-Israeli conflicts. In the prolonged process of seeking peace in the region, the spirit of the 1967 international accord was partially fruitful when Egypt and Israel concluded a peace treaty in 1979. Occupied land on the Sinai Peninsula was returned to Egypt. However, the Israelis have never yielded an inch regarding other occupied territories. The Golan Heights was annexed in December 1981 and Arab Palestine has continued under Israeli rule for nearly a quarter of a century. Toward the end of 1987, a Palestinian national revolt (intifada in Arabic) against the agelong occupation erupted in the Gaza Strip and spread quickly over the whole of occupied Palestine. In spite of suppressive measures taken by Israeli authorities, the resistance has not ceased even today, claiming a death toll of nearly a thousand over the last three years. The Iraqi conquest of Kuwait in early August 1990 stirred the frustrations of Palestinians. The U. N. Security Council adopted Resolution 630, calling for immediate and unconditional withdrawal of Iraq's invading forces from the soil of Kuwait on August 2. It also adopted Reso
著者
友次 晋介
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.39, pp.117-126, 2018-03

Whereas the goals of gender-mainstreaming were steadily set in many fields especially related to the environment, welfare, and development since the late 1990s, the pace of developing the argument on gender balance in the international arena of nuclear disarmament was very slow. Under such circumstances, United Nation Security Council resolution 1325 (2000) was surely a landmark because the necessity of gender-consciousness was clearly expressed in the field of security issues. The resolution 1325 mainly aimed at promoting gender equality in peacebuilding process after the internal armed conflicts, although activists and experts started to link the gender and the interstate matters of nuclear disarmament, in line with the spirit of the resolution. Nonetheless, there were still few discussions regarding the gender equality in nuclear disarmament for a decade after that resolution was adopted. It was the presentation by Ms. Mary Olson, policy expert at Nuclear Information and Resource Service who changed the situation. Her presentation at the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons in December 2014, demonstrated the evidence that radiation damage could be more serious to women. Her argument encouraged Ireland to advocate gender equality more progressively in the policy field of nuclear disarmament by presenting a working paper titled "Gender, Development and Nuclear Weapons" to the 2020 NPT Review Conference Preparation Committee held in May 2017. It is also worth mentioning that Olson made a speech at the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons that facilitated a discussion for the adoption of the Treaty on the Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons. In the preamble of this treaty, significance of gender-mainstreaming was clearly stipulated. Meanwhile, International Law and Policy Institute (ILPI) and United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research (UNDIR) jointly published an influential report "Gender, Development and Nuclear Weapons" in 2016. Gender conscious arguments are considered to be getting more observable from thereafter.
著者
山下 明博
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
no.34, pp.93-115, 2012

The Bell Boeing V-22 Osprey is the tiltrotor aircraft. In 2012, U.S. Marine deployed Osprey at the U.S. Marine Corps' Futenma Air Station in Okinawa prefecture. But, Okinawa residents have opposed the move, citing safety fears. I think Osprey is the ideal aircraft blending the best of helicopters and airplanes, and it will be available for purposes other than military in a near future. This paper attempts to show that Japan should take note about the danger of unmanned aerial vehicle rather than Osprey. First, I explain the position of Osprey in the classification of aircraft and the history of aircraft. Next, I discuss the motivation of rapid development of aircrafts is war. Then, I describe the special features and manipulation of Osprey. Finally, I discuss the safety fears by the deployment of Osprey.
著者
中内 政貴
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU研究報告シリ-ズ (ISSN:13425935)
巻号頁・発行日
no.45, pp.119-132, 2010-03

「平和構築と治安部門改革(SSR) : 開発と安全保障の視点から」第四部「SSRの事例研究」第8章
著者
小野 修
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU研究報告シリ-ズ (ISSN:13425935)
巻号頁・発行日
no.42, pp.168-188, 2009-03

松尾雅嗣教授退職記念論文集 平和学を拓く
著者
小寺 初世子
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
no.5, pp.p83-106, 1982

The progress realized through the efforts at codification of international law since the First Hague Peace Conference of 1899 is, in this author's opinion, quite remarkable in respect to the law of state responsibility. The topic of state responsiblity was already listed among those selected as being suitable for codification when the Conference on the Progressive Codification of International Law was held in 1930 under the auspices of the League of Nations, which ended without success. This topic was revived by the International Law Commission of the United Nations. As the Commission's work proceeded, a trend has been evolved in the theory of international law on legal responsibility of state for its illegal acts or ommission. In other words, criminal responsibility of state has come to be discussed. In fact, not a few treaties now provide for punishment of individuals responsible for state's international crimes. Thus, a new kind of international law, 'international penal/criminal law' or 'penal/criminal international law' has come to attract our attention. And at the same time, the principle of legality has become an important rule in this new law. This short paper is to sum up a tentative result of the author's research on the question of how the principle of legality is, or is not, observed in international criminal law. Her conclusion is, in short, that the principle of legality is proclaimed in the International Bill of Humen Rights. However, neither the principle itself nor provisions in accordance thereto (especially in the provisions of penalties) are yet to be found in any of treaties in the field of international criminal law. One of the reasons the author chose this thenie which is new to her, is, in her belief, that the development of an effective system of punishment of international offences (especially those against peace) will lead to the establishment of peace and security of makind. Various relevant questions have, however, been left undiscussed here, which the author hopes to deal with in th
著者
小林 文男 橋本 学 柴田 巌
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.16, pp.41-84, 1993

The purpose of this paper is to verify differences of the 'Peace Declarations' delivered in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in August 1993. Needless to say, both these 'Declarations' appealed the total abolition of nuclear weapons and complete disarmament in the earth. But, in practice, there were so many differences of content between them. The authors sent out questionnaires for 311 members of Hiroshima university students. The question is 'As to the 'Peace Declarations' made in Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1993. Which 'Declaration' do you feel sympathy for Hiroshima's or Nagasaki's ? And give your reasons for choosing it'. As a result, Nagasaki 'Peace Declaration' proved to have far higher opinions of the subjects than Hiroshima. The main reasons are as follows: (1) It was easier to understand 'Peace Declaration' of Nagasaki than of Hiroshima. (2) Hitoshi Motoshirna, the Mayor of Nagasaki,admitted that Japan had aggressed the Asian countries from 1910 to 1945, showed more friendly attitude to these countries than Takashi Hiraoka, the Mayor of Hiroshima. Nagasaki 'Peace Declarations' have had higher opinions than Hiroshima since the authors began this investigation on 1990. However, the 'Declaration' of Nagasaki in 1993 have more faults than the past 3 years beyond doubt. Because the support rate against it have come down than before. The faults are as follows: (1) The Nagasaki 'Declaration' never mentioned 'PKO' (Peace Keeping Operation) which Japan come up against now. (2) The Nagasaki 'Declaration' didn't definite the concreate compensation and assistance to non-Japanese victims of Atomic Bomb.
著者
松浦 陽子 佐藤 健一 川野 徳幸
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.36, pp.75-100, 2015-03

The purpose of this paper is to explore the peace concepts in Nagasaki by analyzing "Nagasaki Peace Declarations". First, we discuss the meaning components of a concept of peace in three dimensions: the substance or value dimension; the promoting factor dimension; and locus dimension. The results show: (1) The meaning components of the peace concept in the substance or value dimension come down to three further concepts; "nuclear abolition," "absence of war," and "relief for the atomic bomb survivors." (2) The meaning components in the promoting factor dimension can be divided into seven groups; "atomic bomb experience," "the Japanese government," "the United Nations," "treaty," "nuclear states," "countries" and "individual persons". (3) Each promoting factor dimension corresponds with specified meaning components in the substance or value dimension. For example, Nagasaki Peace Declaration expects "the United Nations" to promote "nuclear abolition" and "absence of war." (4) The concept of peace can be divided into two aspects; unchangeable and changeable aspects. (5) Unchangeable peace concept is the absence of war in the world and in the next generations. (6) The most important changeable components of the peace concepts are "nuclear abolition" and "relief for the Atomic Bomb Survivors" promoted by the Japanese government after 1980s.
著者
小倉 亜紗美 隈元 美穂子 東 大作 片柳 真理 宇田川 悟 山下 真理
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU研究報告シリーズ (ISSN:13425935)
巻号頁・発行日
no.54, 2017-03

要旨... 2開会の挨拶...5巻頭言 ...6第Ⅰ部:アジアにおける平和構築の経験 能力強化を通じての平和構築...隈元 美穂子... 10 平和構築における正統性樹立の課題~アジアの経験から~...東 大作 ... 16 カンボジアの経験、そしてミンダナオの明日...片柳 真理 ... 26基調講演 フランスの外交と社交...宇田川 悟 ... 33第Ⅱ部 アジアにおける平和構築の課題と展望 平和創造のためのハードワークの実行...Lt. Gen. Daniel Leaf ... 44 無秩序への対処:アジアの平和と安定に関する国家的、地域的、および超国家的な課題の管理...Anthony Bubalo ... 48 アジアにおける平和構築の課題:グローバルな視点から...山下 真理 ... 53巻末言 ...60資料1:シンポジウム・ポスター 61資料2:アンケート 632016年度第1回広島大学平和科学研究センター主催国際シンポジウム
著者
中満 泉
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU研究報告シリ-ズ (ISSN:13425935)
巻号頁・発行日
no.38, pp.105-128, 2007-04

「国際平和活動における民軍関係の課題」第二部「民軍関係と文民組織」第6章
著者
下向井 龍彦
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 = Hiroshima peace science (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
no.37, pp.1-17, 2015

By focusing on two persons who were involved in A D661-663 Baekje Relief War, the "ancestor of Mitani Gunji" who was a chief of local powerful families in the current northern Hiroshima Prefecture and Gusai who was a monk exiled from Baekje, this paper aims to identify the following three questions:1) What was the Baekje Relief War that the two persons of life are tossed?2) What did the war bring people in the communities?3) What direction d id the war bring to the ancient nation of Japan?
著者
山下 明博
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU研究報告シリ-ズ (ISSN:13425935)
巻号頁・発行日
no.42, pp.213-234, 2009-03

松尾雅嗣教授退職記念論文集 平和学を拓く
著者
Shichijo Kazuko Takatsuji Toshihiro Yamamoto Masayoshi Nakashima Masahiro
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
IPSHU English Research Report Series
巻号頁・発行日
no.28, pp.70-73, 2012-03

The explosion of a plutonium Atomic bomb over Nagasaki city in Japan took place at 1102h on August 9, 1945. Radiation dose of A-bomb survivor is practically estimated from external radiation. The alpha particles can be disregarded science they travel only a short distance through air. Plutonium remaining in the soil at Nagasaki after 24yr has been determined in 1971. In the patients subjected to the Atomic bomb there was no evidence of the introduction of radioactive material. We have already studied the preserved body cells of seven A-bombed victims in 1945, and became the first one to prove that plutonium is continuing to emit radiations after more than 60 years since the A-bomb attack. In this study, the nuclide identification of alpha-emitters in environmental samples and calibration standards has been attempted by the measurement of the alpha track length using autoradiography. Alpha track length in Nagasaki soil; Ground surface soil collected in 1979 from the Nishiyama area in Nagasaki City, 210Po, 241Am and 243Am fitted the relation curve between energy and track length of alpha-particles in the photo emulsion. Moreover, the alpha track length in Nagasaki soil was consisted with that in paraffin-embedded specimen of A-bomb cases. Therefore, the nuclide of alpha-emitters in specimen of atomic victims at Nagasaki was identified with 239,240Pu by autoradiography.
著者
小池 聖一
出版者
広島大学平和科学研究センター
雑誌
広島平和科学 (ISSN:03863565)
巻号頁・発行日
no.18, pp.87-111, 1995

This thesis is a study on the correspondence of the Foreign Office concerning the Japanese-Chinese negotiations on the abolishment of extraterritoriality before and after the Manchurian incident. The negotiations between legation minister Mamoru Shigemithu and the Nationalist Government as political center came to an interruption because of oppositional opinions. But in the provinces, elements of extraterritoriality, such as civil trial, a part of consular jurisdiction, were in reality on the way beeing abolished. Further were the negotiations in the provinces on Korean residents a reason for the Kanto-Army to expand the territory to ' Manchukuo ' after the Manchurian incident. This was also a necessary strategy to conceal military based ' maintenance of public peace ' by the Kanto-Army.