著者
楠川 充敏 中井 孝幸 大山 真司
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.82, no.732, pp.341-351, 2017 (Released:2017-02-28)
参考文献数
19
被引用文献数
5

Academic Library is defined the place to help students. Learning Commons(LC) is increasing by library improvement and a new establishment. By LC of the library it has been introduced, I will increasingly be extent of seat choice. And extent of seat choice diversity. This paper is user's awareness of the places, by LC of the library it has been introduced. And from the view point of group user and private user, to understand that whereabouts formation of the place, An object thereof is to clarify the hierarchical structure in the choice behavior of the place, Surveyed academic library is three academic library with the LC of Aichi Prefecture. Configuration of LC in three academic library so different. Survey way Question paper by visitors in library, and Plot patrol. LC is specialized in the group user, but there were much private user. LC was used a lot as a place of the personal learning and revealed what it the place that can talk but also the space that I can learn quietly. In the academic library, personal use, and group use was seen in open stuck area and LC regardless of the number of user. In the open stuck, both the personal use, and the group use choose the quiet space around. In addition, the user chooses a seat while minding eyes of another person, and the group use knew that there was a type to choose the far space from the quiet space and a type to melt into the active space. So I think that I mind eyes in learning commons, and I secure anonymity in active environment. According to space choice, I think that I choose a space to a learning style each, when concentration level from the quiet space to the active space changes. Example, quiet space from active space of easy from active space by step up floor. When I choose the learning environment that there was s oneself of the day from the conversation of the user and around the sound environment, I think that the choice of the space is hierarchy. In academic library with LC, the place to be choose by the learning activities, are organized into six by the sound environment and companion form. Factor of seat choice is the degree of the conversation of the learner, and sound environment of surrounding and density of people and space. This three stage, and it is classified among private user and the group user. After this, I need not only the active space such as LC, and it is necessary to maintain the quiet space. Next paper, I want to clarify it hierarchical structure from user's awareness and user's behavior in detail. And I want to calculate the number of seat.
著者
中井 孝幸
出版者
愛知工業大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2011

1市6町が合併した東近江市の7図書館での調査から、各館が施設サービスに特徴を持っているため、各館のサービスをきちんと理解して6割近い利用者が複数の館を使い分けて利用するなど、従来までの近い・多いだけではない各館のサービスを熟知した「相対的な使い分け利用」が具体的に確認できた。ラーニングコモンズなどの設置が増えてきた大学図書館では、着座行為率(着座人数/滞在者数)が90%を超えるなど着座に対する要望が高く、座席選択は公共図書館では窓からの眺望などが理由として挙げられるが、大学図書館では集中して作業できることが優先されるなど利用意識はかなり異なることが分かった。
著者
中井 孝幸 小野 美咲 宮城 喬平
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.81, no.729, pp.2359-2369, 2016

&nbsp;Approximately four and a half year has passed since the Great East Japan Earthquake happened on March 11<sup>th</sup>, 2011. Many people are still living in temporary houses. In this article, we regard Miyagi prefecture as an example of the most damaged area, and analyze the difference of users' awareness and sphere before and after the earthquake. The purpose is to arrange and grasp the image of new library.<br>&nbsp;We conducted a survey of all users at 4 libraries, Higashimatsushima, Kesennuma, Minamisanriku and Natori, which are located in the coastal area. Higashimatsushima City Library, having had no damage, started to operate again with the existing building. Kesennuma Library started operating at an early date, closing the damaged section. Minamisanriku Town Library moved to another site and started operating in a temporary wooden building due to the severe damage from Tsunami. Natori City Library was demolished after the disaster, and rebuilt a temporary wooden facility in the same site.<br>&nbsp;Users' sphere shows the similar tendency both on weekdays and weekends. As for Kesennuma and Natori, many users come from nearby. As for Higashimatsushima, they come from a distance of about 6km and as for Minamisanriku, some people come from 20km away. At Kesennuma, user's staying time get longer because students study. The other libraries have smaller number of users staying for a long time, so there is only about 30 to 40 minute of time differences between the weekdays and weekends.<br>&nbsp;On weekends the majority are the children and students, and on weekdays house wives and elderlies. However, signi cant differences between weekends and weekdays couldn't be seen in users' purpose and awareness. The 60% of users are from the ooded area in Higashimatsushima (where the large area were ooded) and Minamisannriku in which they suffered from a great damage of Tsunami. The large part of Natori was also ooded , but users from ooded area are less than that of Higashimatsushima. In Kesennuma, 34% of the library users who lived in the ooded area are still in the temporary housing. 25% of the citizens moved into other places due to the damage of the disaster, but many of them still continue to use the library. The frequencies of use increased in all 4 libraries whether the people live in the ooded place or not, before and after earthquake. Some of them have never used the library until the disaster, and increased the number of people are visiting to seek out for some comfort.<br>&nbsp;It was dif cult for users who suffered damage from Tsunami to use libraries immediately after the disaster. On the other hand, many people say that libraries should have reopened sooner. For getting back a normal life in an unfamiliar environment, it is necessary to have some place to visit in public space. It is important for libraries to play a role not only as the place to read books, but also as the place for people to get together.
著者
中井 孝幸 小野 美咲 宮城 喬平
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.81, no.729, pp.2359-2369, 2016

&nbsp;Approximately four and a half year has passed since the Great East Japan Earthquake happened on March 11<sup>th</sup>, 2011. Many people are still living in temporary houses. In this article, we regard Miyagi prefecture as an example of the most damaged area, and analyze the difference of users' awareness and sphere before and after the earthquake. The purpose is to arrange and grasp the image of new library.<br>&nbsp;We conducted a survey of all users at 4 libraries, Higashimatsushima, Kesennuma, Minamisanriku and Natori, which are located in the coastal area. Higashimatsushima City Library, having had no damage, started to operate again with the existing building. Kesennuma Library started operating at an early date, closing the damaged section. Minamisanriku Town Library moved to another site and started operating in a temporary wooden building due to the severe damage from Tsunami. Natori City Library was demolished after the disaster, and rebuilt a temporary wooden facility in the same site.<br>&nbsp;Users' sphere shows the similar tendency both on weekdays and weekends. As for Kesennuma and Natori, many users come from nearby. As for Higashimatsushima, they come from a distance of about 6km and as for Minamisanriku, some people come from 20km away. At Kesennuma, user's staying time get longer because students study. The other libraries have smaller number of users staying for a long time, so there is only about 30 to 40 minute of time differences between the weekdays and weekends.<br>&nbsp;On weekends the majority are the children and students, and on weekdays house wives and elderlies. However, signi cant differences between weekends and weekdays couldn't be seen in users' purpose and awareness. The 60% of users are from the ooded area in Higashimatsushima (where the large area were ooded) and Minamisannriku in which they suffered from a great damage of Tsunami. The large part of Natori was also ooded , but users from ooded area are less than that of Higashimatsushima. In Kesennuma, 34% of the library users who lived in the ooded area are still in the temporary housing. 25% of the citizens moved into other places due to the damage of the disaster, but many of them still continue to use the library. The frequencies of use increased in all 4 libraries whether the people live in the ooded place or not, before and after earthquake. Some of them have never used the library until the disaster, and increased the number of people are visiting to seek out for some comfort.<br>&nbsp;It was dif cult for users who suffered damage from Tsunami to use libraries immediately after the disaster. On the other hand, many people say that libraries should have reopened sooner. For getting back a normal life in an unfamiliar environment, it is necessary to have some place to visit in public space. It is important for libraries to play a role not only as the place to read books, but also as the place for people to get together.
著者
今井 正次 赤松 光哉 中井 孝幸 上西 真哉
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.65, no.535, pp.107-113, 2000-09-30 (Released:2017-02-03)
参考文献数
9

This paper is aimed abstract the planning points in combined classes as the learnig space by investigation of learning activities . 11 cases in 6 School were investigated and then simulated the learning activity in other learning cases. Learning activities are classified into lecturer, discussion, exercise and practice. Some conclusions are follows; ・In combined classes, teachers and school children devise the layout of their desks and blackboards to keep away from disturb each grade. ・When there are two grades in one classroom, it is agreeable to set up another learning comer for the conversion of learning activities.
著者
中井 孝幸
出版者
社団法人情報科学技術協会
雑誌
情報の科学と技術 (ISSN:09133801)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.63, no.6, pp.228-234, 2013-06-01
参考文献数
15

公共図書館と大学図書館では,利用者層や利用内容,提供しているサービスも異なるが,アンケート調査や行動観察調査から,利用者が図書館という「場」に何を求めて利用しているのかを整理し,図書館計画への示唆を得ることを目的としている。公共図書館では,図書の貸出が主な利用ではあるが,館内での滞在的な利用も多くなっている。少数ではあるが人ごみに紛れることで匿名性を確保して,落ち着きを求めている利用者も見受けられた。大学図書館では,個人で集中して勉強する場としての利用が多いが,会話を伴う学習形態も増えている。静かな場所とにぎやかな場所,アナログとデジタル資料など,利用者は図書館サービスを適切に使い分けている。
著者
中井 孝幸
出版者
一般社団法人 情報科学技術協会
雑誌
情報の科学と技術 (ISSN:09133801)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.63, no.6, pp.228-234, 2013-06-01 (Released:2017-04-18)
参考文献数
15
被引用文献数
1

公共図書館と大学図書館では,利用者層や利用内容,提供しているサービスも異なるが,アンケート調査や行動観察調査から,利用者が図書館という「場」に何を求めて利用しているのかを整理し,図書館計画への示唆を得ることを目的としている。公共図書館では,図書の貸出が主な利用ではあるが,館内での滞在的な利用も多くなっている。少数ではあるが人ごみに紛れることで匿名性を確保して,落ち着きを求めている利用者も見受けられた。大学図書館では,個人で集中して勉強する場としての利用が多いが,会話を伴う学習形態も増えている。静かな場所とにぎやかな場所,アナログとデジタル資料など,利用者は図書館サービスを適切に使い分けている。
著者
楠川 充敏 鈴木 賢一 中井 孝幸
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.85, no.776, pp.2107-2117, 2020 (Released:2020-10-30)
参考文献数
9

1. Objectives In Japanese universities, the realization of a new type of group learning environment, based on the use of analogic and digital media, has been promoted: Learning Commons (hereinafter, "LC"). Recently, examples of LC built separately from university library have increased. In the previous report, we conducted surveys in libraries where the reading area and the LCs are integrated, aiming to clarify the seat choice behavior of individual and group users. However, it was still to define if all the users actually choose only one of those two types, or if some of them rather choose both types. For this reason, we tried to clarify the differentiated use behavior of reading areaff and LCs, aiming to acquire a useful knowledge for future learning space planning. 2. Research method We conducted a questionnaire survey and a behavior observation survey regarding the use status (addressed to users), and a questionnaire survey regarding the facility conditions (addressed to library staff). The surveys were conducted in four Japanese universities: Sugiyama Jogakuen University, Ritsumeikan University, Chubu University, and Kyoto Sangyo University, which have different LC installation types. All of those institutions have more than 6,000 students and multiple departments. The different LC installation types have been identified as “integrated open type” (Sugiyama Jogakuen Univ.), “integrated separate type” (Ritsumeikan Univ.), “distributed combined type” (Chubu Univ.), “distributed independent type” (Kyoto Sangyo Univ.). 3. Results We noted that, as for the actual conditions, LC facilities have been built outside the library building in those universities where the number of students is larger. Our hypothesis was that most of the single users tend to chose reading areas, and that most of the group users tend to chose LC; however, the results showed that around the 50% of the plural places users tend to choose both facilities, regardless of single or group use. The analysis of this portion of users’ behavior made clear that, between the reasons of their place choice, there are the possibility of using learning tools as PCs and copy machines, and the factor of nearness (LC facilities situated near the faculty building were largely used). In the “distributed type”, a large number of users chose both reading areas and LC because of the quiet environment. From this, it can be thought that by separating LC from the library building, it becomes possible to create various acoustic environments inside the vast surface obtained. Also in the “integrated open type”, where there are no partitions between reading areas and LC, and where, within the same floor, there is a differentiation of quiet and lively spaces, many users’ purpose was “to find a quiet environment”. This behavior could only mean that the concept of “quietness” is not only linked to the absence of sound. 4. Conclusions From those considerations, it seems necessary to provide a differentiation in the sound environment of the learning spaces. Even by planning spaces where there is a sort of “noisy” acoustic condition, it becomes possible to increase the place choice factors of the users.
著者
楠川 充敏 鈴木 賢一 中井 孝幸
出版者
日本建築学会
雑誌
日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.85, no.776, pp.2107-2117, 2020

<p> <b>1. Objectives</b></p><p> In Japanese universities, the realization of a new type of group learning environment, based on the use of analogic and digital media, has been promoted: Learning Commons (hereinafter, "LC").</p><p> Recently, examples of LC built separately from university library have increased. In the previous report, we conducted surveys in libraries where the reading area and the LCs are integrated, aiming to clarify the seat choice behavior of individual and group users. However, it was still to define if all the users actually choose only one of those two types, or if some of them rather choose both types.</p><p> For this reason, we tried to clarify the differentiated use behavior of reading areaff and LCs, aiming to acquire a useful knowledge for future learning space planning.</p><p> <b>2. Research method</b></p><p> We conducted a questionnaire survey and a behavior observation survey regarding the use status (addressed to users), and a questionnaire survey regarding the facility conditions (addressed to library staff).</p><p> The surveys were conducted in four Japanese universities: Sugiyama Jogakuen University, Ritsumeikan University, Chubu University, and Kyoto Sangyo University, which have different LC installation types. All of those institutions have more than 6,000 students and multiple departments. The different LC installation types have been identified as "integrated open type" (Sugiyama Jogakuen Univ.), "integrated separate type" (Ritsumeikan Univ.), "distributed combined type" (Chubu Univ.), "distributed independent type" (Kyoto Sangyo Univ.).</p><p> <b>3. Results</b></p><p> We noted that, as for the actual conditions, LC facilities have been built outside the library building in those universities where the number of students is larger.</p><p> Our hypothesis was that most of the single users tend to chose reading areas, and that most of the group users tend to chose LC; however, the results showed that around the 50% of the plural places users tend to choose both facilities, regardless of single or group use.</p><p> The analysis of this portion of users' behavior made clear that, between the reasons of their place choice, there are the possibility of using learning tools as PCs and copy machines, and the factor of nearness (LC facilities situated near the faculty building were largely used).</p><p> In the "distributed type", a large number of users chose both reading areas and LC because of the quiet environment. From this, it can be thought that by separating LC from the library building, it becomes possible to create various acoustic environments inside the vast surface obtained. Also in the "integrated open type", where there are no partitions between reading areas and LC, and where, within the same floor, there is a differentiation of quiet and lively spaces, many users' purpose was "to find a quiet environment". This behavior could only mean that the concept of "quietness" is not only linked to the absence of sound.</p><p> <b>4. Conclusions</b></p><p> From those considerations, it seems necessary to provide a differentiation in the sound environment of the learning spaces. Even by planning spaces where there is a sort of "noisy" acoustic condition, it becomes possible to increase the place choice factors of the users.</p>