著者
伊藤 智明 福本 俊樹
出版者
企業家研究フォーラム
雑誌
企業家研究 (ISSN:24340316)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.18, pp.23-40, 2021-07-10 (Released:2022-08-20)
参考文献数
28

Engagement with an Entrepreneur and a ResearcherSecond-person Approach and Convivial Tools as Methods of Entrepre- neurial ResearchChiaki Ito and Toshiki FukumotoThe purpose of this paper is to explore qualitative methodology that enhances the viability and continuity of fieldwork that tracks entrepreneurs’ trial and error. Capturing the trials and errors of entrepreneurs requires second-person engagement with entrepreneurs and convivial tools. In this article, through examples of the author’s own fieldwork with an en- trepreneur and a researcher, we suggest that the knowledge creation system of manage- ment science can be used as convivial tools for forming and maintaining relationships.
著者
福本 俊樹 松嶋 登 古賀 広志
出版者
日本情報経営学会
雑誌
日本情報経営学会誌 = Journal of information and management (ISSN:18822614)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.34, no.4, pp.59-70, 2014-08

In recent information systems research, design science that puts importance on practical relevance attracts many scholars' attention. Some IS researchers expect design science to overcome the positivist approach that lost practical relevance in exchange for scientific rigor. Does dismissing positivism, however, truly make design science more relevant? Even if IS researchers would broaden their methods such as compensatory multi-method or multilevel analysis, they are still under traditional philosophy of science as usual. This paper shows how rigorous scientific methods of positivism can ensure scientific relevance to intervention through an examination of behavioral science and action science. The latter has established by Chris Argyris as the new philosophy of science aimed at intervention into practice. In particular, three fundamental methods of positivism are examined: description, causal explanation, and hypothesis testing.
著者
福本 俊樹 Toshiki Fukumoto
出版者
同志社大学商学会
雑誌
同志社商学 = Doshisha Shogaku (The Doshisha Business Review) (ISSN:03872858)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.75, no.1, pp.109-124, 2023-06-30

本稿では、社会化が行われるその現場において、社会化エージェントがなんらかの人物(パーソン)として現象するそのしかたを、相互行為論に依拠しつつ考察する。具体的には、採用面接の事例を通して、採用面接官(社会化エージェント)の人物(パーソン)が現れ、応募者(新人)に観察可能になるそのプロセスを分析する。そこから、個人化された戦術をまさに「戦術」として用いる際の含意を導出する。
著者
福本 俊樹 松嶋 登 古賀 広志
出版者
日本情報経営学会
雑誌
日本情報経営学会誌 (ISSN:18822614)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.34, no.4, pp.59-70, 2014-08-04 (Released:2017-08-07)
被引用文献数
2

In recent information systems research, design science that puts importance on practical relevance attracts many scholars' attention. Some IS researchers expect design science to overcome the positivist approach that lost practical relevance in exchange for scientific rigor. Does dismissing positivism, however, truly make design science more relevant? Even if IS researchers would broaden their methods such as compensatory multi-method or multilevel analysis, they are still under traditional philosophy of science as usual. This paper shows how rigorous scientific methods of positivism can ensure scientific relevance to intervention through an examination of behavioral science and action science. The latter has established by Chris Argyris as the new philosophy of science aimed at intervention into practice. In particular, three fundamental methods of positivism are examined: description, causal explanation, and hypothesis testing.