著者
宮本 要太郎
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1987, no.55, pp.45-57, 1987-05-10 (Released:2009-09-04)
参考文献数
41

The characteristic features of Pestalozzi's (1746-1827) concept of 'autonomy' are considered to be structurally speaking the three structural levels of economic autonomy, of legal or civic autonomy, and moral or internal autonomy, and internally speaking the harmonious development of the internal powers of man stemming from self-activity. This is the trust put into the spontaneity of human nature based on Leibniz' anthropology, and in this regard Pestalozzi follows the same line as Rousseau. Furthermore, autonomy according to Pestalozzi in the sense that it implies the potential condition of free self-determination it ressembles Kant's autonomy, on the other hand, because it is based on love rooted in faith, it differs from Kant's autonomy. In other words, starting from the negative education founded in an absolute and optimistic faith in nature (Rousseau), then standing on the rational will of moralizing man living in society (Kant), furthermore transcending this, too, a positive formation concept arises putting its hope in the purification of man as an organic whole by faith and love (Pestalozzi).
著者
岸 信行
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1987, no.55, pp.58-72, 1987-05-10 (Released:2010-05-07)
参考文献数
62

To compare the educational philosopher Fr.Frobel (1782-1852) with the painter P.Césanne (1839-1906) may seem as unexpectedly presenting something new. But, while at first sight, the two seem to have nothing in common, in fact a very important simalarity between the ideas of both men can be discovered. They have in common that both recognize as a norm the original form of 'nature' and tried to express it as something meaningful through human life. The way of expressing was different, 'art' on the one hand and 'education' on the other; for Césanne the goal of expression was 'painting', for Frobel the expression and the interpretation of nature was the task of 'education', it may be said. In this paper the author examines the similarity of the thinking of both men focusing on their expression and interpretation of nature including an investigation of the origin of the ressmblance of their ideas.
著者
中井 孝章
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1987, no.55, pp.73-86, 1987-05-10 (Released:2010-05-07)
参考文献数
52

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the nature of dialogue (dia-logos) in educational practice form the phenomenological point of view. In learning topos, the occation on which creative dialogue develops between the teacher and the learner and between the learners themselves, lies within the 'hearing' process. 'Hearing' involves various steps. However, the teacher being all ear 'listening' to what the learner expresses out of his solitary problem awareness, is actually questioning the learner and at the same time, a process of creative dialogue starts when the teacher makes the learner express himself, thus stimulating the problem awareness of the leaner. In that sense, dialogue can be said to be an undertaking by which, without abandoning one's own indivisual nature, mutual positive self-assertion can be realised. Dialogue transcends the relative dimention of logos search (question and answer, talking to and response) -it arises rather from the radical topos making possible thus the logos search as such.
著者
堺 正之
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1986, no.54, pp.91-94, 1986-11-10 (Released:2009-09-04)
参考文献数
4

私が本誌第五〇号において、ボルノウの解釈学的認識論をディルタイ解釈学の継承とその発展という観点から考察した際に、その関連において、理解の共同体的次元を表現するものとしての「言語」、また解釈学的過程における言語的契機の問題をとり上げた。そこで明らかとなったのは、第一に、新たなるものの経験が「言語」という媒体の中でなされるということ、第二に、その「言語」とは、認識過程全体において「前-構造」 (Vor-Struktur) を有する「理解」 (前理解) の意識化 (言語化) されたものに他ならないということである。このような思想は、ボルノウの解釈学的認識論の教育学的意義とりわけ解釈学的視点と教授法との関連を考察する上で重要であるが、さらにこれを言語教育の問題として据え直すことはできないであろうか。ここではヘムベルク (Homber, B) の所説を参照しつつ、現段階での研究状況を報告したい。