文献一覧: 日本科学史学会 (出版者)

1 0 0 0 ロックフェラー財団による184インチのサイクロトロン計画への援助決定過程

著者: 日野川静枝
出版者: 日本科学史学会
雑誌: 科学史研究. 第II期 (ISSN:00227692)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.45, no.238, pp.81-91, 2006-06-01
参考文献数: 35
被引用文献数: 2

The World War II broke out in Europe in 1939, and the United States set up the National Defense Research Committee on June in 1940. On April 3,1940, the Meeting of Trustees of the Rockefeller Foundation decided on a grant of $1,150,000 to support the construction of a new 184-inch cyclotron at the University of California. This paper elucidates the process leading up to that decision. The decision-making process can be divided into three stages : The first, beginning in October 1939, saw initial enthusiasm for the giant cyclotron project; the second, lasting until February 1940, involved changes in the Foundation's internal circumstances and limitations on funding; the third, which began in early February 1940, saw specific steps toward the materialization of Foundation support for the project. Doubtlessly, Lawrence's supporters tangibly and intangibly influenced the Rockefeller Foundation's decision to support the construction of the giant cyclotron. The decision-making process, however, seems to shed light on the Foundation's grant-making plans or grant-making policy. That is, the Foundation was deeply involved in drawing up the plans from the start, and provided grants for carefully-selected, large-scale, and long-range projects in the fields it was interested in. The giant cyclotron project, for which single-source support was an important issue, seems to be one such case.

2021-07-27 11:17:14
1 + 0 Twitter

https://ci.nii.ac.jp/naid/110006436241

1 0 0 0 資料 : イブン・アル=ハイサム『光についての論述』

著者: 甲子雅代
出版者: 日本科学史学会
雑誌: 科学史研究. 第II期 (ISSN:00227692)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.33, no.191, pp.143-151, 1994-09-27

2021-07-10 16:25:24
1 + 1 Twitter

1 0 0 0 零戦の設計・試作過程と人命軽視の技術思想

著者: 加藤博雄
出版者: 日本科学史学会
雑誌: 科学史研究. 第II期 (ISSN:00227692)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.32, no.187, pp.157-161, 1993-09-28
参考文献数: 39

2021-06-30 13:00:06
1 + 0 Twitter

1 0 0 0 OA 日本の高エネルギー研究者集団の形成における科研費総合研究宮本班の役割

著者: 平田光司高岩義信
出版者: 日本科学史学会
雑誌: 科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.56, no.281, pp.17, 2017 (Released:2020-12-15)

2021-06-29 20:02:32
1 + 0 Twitter

1 0 0 0 『関訂書』に見られる明代後期の中国・回回暦法研究について

著者: 小林博行
出版者: 日本科学史学会
雑誌: 科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.53, no.269, pp.85-98, 2014

The Seki Teisyo (関訂書), a manuscript compiled by Seki Takakazu (関孝和) in 1686, is known to consist of 15 treatises which Seki extracted from an early Qing astronomical and astrological corpus, the Tianwen Dacheng Guankui Jiyao (天文大成管窺輯要). Containing a detailed account of the Shoushi Li (授時暦) as well as a comparative study of Chinese and Islamic calendrical systems, these treatises have drawn the attention not only of Seki but of modern historians. In this paper, I show that 14 of the 15 treatises Seki selected had been composed by a late Ming scholar, Zhou Shuxue (周述学), who discussed issues with Tang Shunzhi (唐順之). Their time predates the era in which the mathematical basis of the Shoushi Li was scrutinized and a new Chinese calendrical system was invented incorporating Western astronomical knowledge. I also mention some earlier works that Tang and Zhou could have consulted. Although Seki never knew the author of the treatises nor their background, his concern centered on themes that seem to have derived from one of those earlier works: the Liyuan (暦源).

2021-06-11 19:43:40
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA 科学史研究

著者: 日本科学史学会編
出版者: 日本科学史学会
巻号頁・発行日: vol.11, no.102, 1972-06

2021-04-19 00:14:32
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA 科学史研究

著者: 日本科学史学会編
出版者: 日本科学史学会
巻号頁・発行日: vol.9, no.96, 1970-12

2021-04-19 00:14:29
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA 科学史研究

著者: 日本科学史学会編
出版者: 日本科学史学会
巻号頁・発行日: vol.17, no.126, 1978-06

2021-04-19 00:14:26
1 + 1 Wikipedia

1 0 0 0 OA カイロ・ゲニザ文書における眼病の治療について

著者: 法貴遊
出版者: 日本科学史学会
雑誌: 科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)
巻号頁・発行日: vol.54, no.274, pp.37, 2015 (Released:2020-12-14)

The present article explores practical aspects of medieval ophthalmology in Cairo Genizah, by examining an exchange of letters (T-S 10J16.16) between two ophthalmologists (Abu Zikri and Abu 'Ali). In this document, written between the twelfth and thirteenth century, they talked about conditions and treatments of three eye diseases, i.e. ulcer of cornea (qarha fi qarniya), conjunctivitis (ramad) and trachoma (jarab). I compare their descriptions with the explanations found in major Arabic ophthalmological texts, and thereby reveal the practical dimension of their medical activity. At the stage of diagnosis, Abu Zikri's observation was based on the same pathological knowledge as described in the medieval Arabic medical texts, which was also shared by Abu 'All. However, when deciding the treatment plans, the two ophthalmologists, though still basing themselves on the same medical books, adopted different methods. Finally, at the stage of prescription, Abu 'Ali suggested the use of some medical substances that could seldom be found in the major texts. His knowledge of pharmacotherapy could come from his experiences (tajriba). Although such empirical knowledge might not have affected Abu 'All's basic physiology, its accumulation within the domain of pharmacotherapy could have influenced his decision about treatment plans.