著者

山田 恭平 千代 章一郎

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

学術講演梗概集. F-1, 都市計画, 建築経済・住宅問題 (ISSN:13414534)

巻号頁・発行日

no.2011, pp.401-402, 2011-07-20

著者

山田 恭平 千代 章一郎

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会中国支部研究報告集

巻号頁・発行日

no.35, pp.733-736, 2012-03

著者

塚野 路哉 千代 章一郎

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.82, no.735, pp.1239-1246, 2017 (Released:2017-05-30)

参考文献数

16

被引用文献数

2

---

The influence of Le Corbusier (1887-1965) upon the architectural works of Kunio Mayekawa (1905-1986) has often been recognized in studies. Moreover, Mayekawa himself mentioned that he had been influenced by “Dom-ino (1914)” as Le Corbusier insisted. Having said that, among the “5 points of modern architecture (Les 5 points d'une architecture nouvelle, 1929)” reflected in principle by Dom-ino, only the roof garden was continued by Mayekawa throughout his design activities. If the roof garden in Mayekawa Kunio's works is the only method borrowed from Le Corbusier before, during, and after the war, we can obtain a new idea regarding the construction theory of Kunio Mayekawa by clarifying how Le Corbusier influenced his use of this element. I have used the drawing material and anthologies of Mayekawa Associates Architects & Engineers as my primary sources concerning the works of Mayekawa. I have considered the roof gardens included in Mayekawa's works from these primary materials, classified them into four periods based on existing studies, and thus understood each outline by period (Chapter 2). Next, I have analyzed the elements of the roof garden, upon which Kunio Mayekawa particularly focused at the influence of Villa Savoye (1932) and Unité d'Habitation de Marseille (1952), based upon the drawings and photographs by Kunio Mayekawa (Chapter 3). In addition, I have analyzed the influence of Le Corbusier upon Mayekawa's roof garden by considering the differences between, and similarity to, Mayekawa's roof garden and his interpretation of that of Le Corbusier (Chapter 4). As a result, I have clarified the following two aspects of Le Corbusier's influence upon Mayekawa's roof garden. 1. Mayekawa continued to focus upon Le Corbusier's roof garden in his works and used those designs in Japan as a solution to the problems faced by society. In fact, Mayekawa's roof gardens have been compared to the works of Le Corbusier, each of which Mayekawa had visited. Mayekawa's roof garden can be explained by its relation to the Villa Savoye (1932) or Unité d'Habitation de Marseille (1952). 2. Kunio Mayekawa's acceptance of Le Corbusier's roof garden showed particularly after World War II. In the first period after the war, Mayekawa referred to the style of the composition's elements established in the roof garden of Villa Savoye directly. In the second period after the war, he applied the organic style of the composition elements arranged in the roof garden of Unité d'Habitation de Marseille by abstracting it and making it geometric. In the third period after the war, by applying the relation between a hanging garden and a roof garden at the Villa Savoye to his own roof garden, he added visual indoor-outdoor continuity, as well as a strolling pathway to a roof garden in public buildings. Therefore, Kunio Mayekawa kept his eye upon Le Corbusier's work (which he experienced himself) in the creation of his roof gardens, regardless of whether he referred to their shape. Moreover, Kunio Mayekawa applied the elements that referenced spatial composition rather than referencing forms as he entered the late stage of his career.

著者

石橋 彩子 千代 章一郎

出版者

一般社団法人日本建築学会

雑誌

学術講演梗概集. F-2, 建築歴史・意匠 (ISSN:13414542)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2003, pp.323-324, 2003-07-30

著者

千代 章一郎 光畑 勲

出版者

日本感性工学会

雑誌

日本感性工学会論文誌 (ISSN:18840833)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.11, no.2, pp.113-120, 2012 (Released:2012-03-29)

参考文献数

12

---

This paper aims to consider the environmental proposition regarding the change from the third grader to the fourth grader concerning life environments. The method can be categorized into two stages, the first being the conduction of the questionnaire and workshop, organized as follows “attempt to research”, “attempt to encode”, “attempt to survey”, “attempt to propose” and “attempt to criticize”, the second being the comparison of the tendency about the result data. According to the analysis, when a school year changes from the third into the fourth grader, the child tends to recognize the allover space similar to a bird's eye view and tends to estimate it objectively. However, there is no difference about icons' type in the proposal phase, and the five senses are maintained.

著者

前田 忠直 水上 優 千代 章一郎

出版者

京都大学

雑誌

基盤研究(C)

巻号頁・発行日

2000

---

近代住宅の構成システムを,その変容過程の分析をとおして場所論的にあきらかにしようとする本研究は,平成12年度には,アルヴァ・アアルトの住宅作品(マイレア邸を中心として)他の研究として遂行され,平成13年度には,ル・コルビュジエの住宅作品(クルチェット邸)の研究他として,平成14年度には,ルイス・バラガン(バラガン自邸)の研究,ル・コルビュジエの住宅作品(ラ・ロッシュ=ジャヌレ邸)の研究,さらにはルイス・カーンの住宅作品(ホーニックマン邸)他として遂行され,別リストの諸論文が公表された。上記の住宅作品の研究は,草案群の吟味を基礎とし,3種のダイアグラムの作成による平面分析,作品の模型作成による検証,さらに建築家自身の言葉による解釈をとおして遂行されている。主題解明は,2つのアスペクトをとおしてなされる。(1)住宅の内部を構成する諸要素のシステムの解明。(2)住宅(内部)と土地(外部)との関わり合いの解明。前者については,主室の諸要素の配置構成の変容分析をとおして,アアルト,ル・コルビュジエ,バラガン,カーンの構成方法の特性があきらかにされた。後者については,内部と外部を媒介する要素,つまり中庭(マイレア邸),テラス(クルチェット邸,バラガン邸),サテライト(ホーニックマン邸)の意味がそれぞれダイアグラムC(住宅と土地とのゲシュタルト図)の作成とともに主題化され,その場所論的解釈が目論まれる。さらに,ル・コルビュジエの住宅作品では,移行の場所,「斜路」が主題化され,空間構成の深まりの仕方が景観の問題として分析された。カーンの住宅作品では,内部成立を担う特異なエレメントが「サテライト」として,その存在論的意味が分析された。

著者

横山 尚 千代 章一郎

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.72, no.621, pp.229-236, 2007

被引用文献数

1

---

This paper aims to clarify the change process of the landscape of tourism of Hiroshima Castle as the famous place after the Second World War. Analyzing the guide texts of the sightseeing bus tours and the interview to a person who experienced bus tour guide, we can find out that the history of the castle in the military city is more emphasized than the present castle as the public park in the guidance of recent years. The meaning of Hiroshima Castle as the famous place was limited to the place guided about the definite history with the view from the outside of the castle.