著者

山口 和雄

出版者

北海道大學經濟學會 = HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY Sapporo Japan

雑誌

經濟學研究 (ISSN:04516265)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, pp.23-58, 1951

著者

山口 和雄 加野 直巳 横倉 隆伸 木口 努 田中 明子 佐藤 比呂志

出版者

日本活断層学会

雑誌

活断層研究 (ISSN:09181024)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1998, no.17, pp.54-64, 1998-12-29 (Released:2012-11-13)

参考文献数

32

---

A seismic survey was conducted across the Tachikawa active fault in the western suburbs of Tokyo metropolitan area. The deep structure and movement of the fault are discussed based on the CMP stacked seismic section together with the geological data published previously. The results are as follows:(1) A flexure, about 150 meters in width, underlies the flexure scarp of the fault and continues vertically down to 1000 meters in depth.(2) The displacement of the fa u lt is about 100 meters upthrow of the northeast side between 300meters and 600 meters in depth, while the displacement at basement depth is about 100 meters downthrow of the northeast side.(3) The northeast side o f the fault had subsided relatively to the southwest side in the past. The fault movement was stopped for a while. Then the fault movement was reversed and the northeast side has been upheaved up to now. This is an inversion tectonics of the fault movement.

著者

山口 和雄

出版者

漁業経済学会

雑誌

漁業経済研究 (ISSN:04330323)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.17, no.2, pp.70-73, 1969-03

著者

楮原 京子 加野 直巳 山口 和雄 横田 俊之

出版者

社団法人 物理探査学会

雑誌

物理探査 (ISSN:09127984)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.64, no.5, pp.345-357, 2011 (Released:2016-04-15)

参考文献数

23

---

新潟沿岸はひずみ集中帯に属し,ここでは1964年新潟地震,2007年新潟県中越沖地震が発生している。しかし,沿岸域は地質情報の乏しい領域であり,海陸境界部の地質構造の詳細は解明されていない。本研究では新潟海岸南西部において陸から海へと連続する活断層と推定されていた長岡平野西縁断層帯・角田・弥彦断層の位置・形状を明らかにするため,断層推定位置を横断する2測線での新規反射法地震探査と石油公団(現・独立行政法人石油天然ガス・金属鉱物資源機構)基礎物理探査「新潟~富山浅海域」の再解析を行った。データの処理は共通反射点(CMP)重合法を用いた。その結果,陸域断面,海陸接合断面,海域断面のいずれにおいても,堆積層が東へ大きく撓む構造が認められ,角田・弥彦断層が明らかに陸域から海域にのびる断層であることが示された。断層上盤側の堆積構造ならびに褶曲構造の特徴から,角田・弥彦断層がテクトニックインバージョンを背景とする逆断層で,その逆断層としての活動開始時期は西山層堆積中であると推定された。そして,西山層上面を基準とした場合,角田・弥彦断層に付帯する褶曲変形は幅約2kmにおよび,角田・弥彦断層の分布は海岸線付近において屈曲・分岐していることが明らかとなった。

著者

山口 和雄

出版者

経営史学会

雑誌

経営史学 (ISSN:03869113)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.12, no.1, pp.1-4, 1977-10-15 (Released:2009-11-06)

---

The twelfth annual meeting of the Business History Society of Japan was held on October 23rd and 24th, 1976, at Senshu University in Tokyo. The meeting was organized by Professor S. Yonekawa, Professor K. Sugiyama, and myself on the common subject of “Comparative Studies in the History of Business Finance.” The meeting was arranged to compare and discuss business finance in English and Japanese cotton spinning firms and American and Japanese iron and steel mills. The period before World War I was selected for the study of the cotton industry and the inter-war period for the iron and steel industries. The objective of this commontopic session was to investigate how each firm raised long-term and short-term capital and how it used the capital resources thus obtained. Professor Naosuke Takamura of University of Tokyo examined the financing of the five leading companies in the Japanese cotton spinning industry ; Professor Masaji Arai of Kansai University, Oldham Limited in the Lancashire cotton industry ; Professor Yoshimitsu Imuta of Hosei University, the Japan Steel Tube (Nihon Kokan), the Kobe Steel Works (Kobe Seikosho), and other steel mills ; and Professor Junko Nishikawa of Tokyo Commercial College, the electric-power and the iron and steel industries in the United States. The major conclusions of this commontopic session were as follows : (1) Fixed capital in the cotton spinning firms was raised in Japan by issuing new stocks and bonds whereas in England it was supplied by loan capital borrowed from the working class living in the neighborhood of the mills. A considerable part of the working capital in the Japanese cotton mills was supplied by the Bank of Japan by discounting the promissory notes issued by the mills. (2) The nature of a holding company in Japan and the United States was notably different, and in addition the kind of financial institutions that supplied resources directly to manufacturing firms were also different in the two countries : in Japan it was mainly banks, whereas in the United States it was mostly investment trust companies. The nature and the method of raising working capital in iron and steel mills both in Japan and the United States were left for future examination.

著者

山口 和雄 Tsunehiko Yui

出版者

経営史学会

雑誌

経営史学 (ISSN:03869113)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.7, no.1, pp.1-8, 1972-05-30 (Released:2009-11-06)

---

The Seventh Annual Meeting of the Business History Society of Japan was held at the Meiji University, Tokyo, on the 5th and 6th of November, 1971. On the 5th, fourteen papers were read on various topics of Japanese, Chinese, Korean, American and German business history, On the 6th, five papers were read on the above noted common topic, “Introduction and Development of Science and Technology in Japan”, of the pre-World-War-II period.Yamaguchi, one of the organizers of the common topic reports, emphasized that we must study in a close relations with the development of Japanese business enterprise when and how the western science and technology were introduced into Japanese industries and how they were developed by Japanese engineers.The first speaker, Professor Kenji Imazu of the kobe University, evaluated the level of science and technology in Japan at the end of Tokugawa and the beginning of Meiji period, comparing it with that in the western industrialized countries. Then he pointed out that the leading role in introducing western science and technolngy was played by the Kobusho (The Ministry of Industry) mainly in relation with the development of shipping, telegraph, shipbuilding and mining industries in the early stage of Japan's industrialization.Professor Shuji Ohashi of the Niigata University, reported on the development of iron and steel industry in the Meiji period, following the cases of the governmental Kamaishi Iron Mines, Kamaishi Tanaka Works, Military and Naval Arsenals, and the governmental Yawata Ironworks. He emphasized that the trial and error process was the major source of technological development both in governmental and private business.Professor Toshiaki Chokki of the Hosei University, spoke on the manufacturing of industrial machines, specially on the development of loom-building industry in the Meiji and Taisho period. The speaker emphasized the role of Sakichi Toyoda in developing automatic looms and pointed out the need to make a distinction between the loom-builders who had been independent weavers and those who had been engineers of the major cotton spinning mills, just as we can conceptualize the two types of loom-builders in American, i. e. Slater type and Lowell-Moody type.Professor Hoshimi Uchida of the Tokyo College of Economics reported on the forms of introducing and developing the technologies in the chemical industries in Japan. He explained by an elaborate chart the process between initial research and final development of technology and stated that the kind of technologies Japan introduced and the process of introducing them were rather similar to those in the cases of other industrial nations, but we can find a conspicuous difference in the process of domestic diffusion of technologies, once introduced into Japan.The last speaker, Professor Mitsutomo Yuasa of the Kobe University, . reported on the relations between school education and industrial technology of pre War II Japan and concluded that in Japan active engineers did not grow up from within industries but the technologies were introduced from. advanced countries primarily through school education.Professor Yamaguchi presided the following panel discussion.

著者

山口 和雄

出版者

経営史学会

雑誌

経営史学 (ISSN:03869113)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.3, no.1, pp.1-8, 1968-03-15 (Released:2009-11-11)

被引用文献数

1

---

All of the papers published in this number were read at the third annual conference of the Business History Society of Japan which was held at Waseda University on the 20th of November, 1967.In the opening address, Kazuo Yamaguchi emphasized the extent of the competition the western-style enterprises in Japan had to fight with foreigners before they were firmly established by the beginning of the 20th century, and he pointed out the six conditions required for their effective competition in the world market.The second speaker, Kanji Ishii, of the University of Tokyo, explained that there were two types of silk-reeling mills, the mills which produced the common grade of raw silk and the mills which specialized in fine raw silk, both being exported for the American market.He also emphasized that the patterns of behavior of the two mills, the Katakura of the former type and the Gunze of the latter, were quite different in financing, purchasing, and labor recruitment. The commentator, Naosuke Takamura of Yokohama National University, raised the question whether these two types were not related to the two different stages of development of the Japanese silk-reeling industry.Yoichiro Inoue of Hiroshima University followed the technological development of the Nagasaki Shipyard of the Mitsubishi Co. and concluded that the prosperity of the Nagasaki Shipyard was based on its technical superiority over the competitive yards. Shigeaki Yasuoka of Doshisha University commented that the technical aspect should have been discussed in closer relation with other management factors.Tsunehiko Yui, of Meiji University, reported on the Tokyo Marine Insurance Co. formed by Eiichi Shibuzawa and subscribed by some aristocrats, mostly former daimyos. He emphasized the role of Kenkichi Kagami, who led the company successfully through a number of difficulties, devising an effective method of calculation and skillfully exploring the world market.Toshimitsu Imuta of Osaka Municipal University suggested that the success of Tokyo Marine Insurance should also be considered in relation to the development of industrial enterprises, to the cooperation among the competitive insurance companies and finally to the generous government subsidies. The final reporter, Yoshio Togai of Senshu University, traced in detail various challenges the Mitsui Trading Co. had to respond to in its formative years.Keiichiro Nakagawa of Tokyo University asked for further clarification of the competitive situation between the general and specialized merchants on the one hand and between the shipping, insurance and/or foreign exchange functions of those general merchants and the same kind of subsidiary businesses operated by independent firms on the other.

著者

山口 和雄

出版者

社会経済史学会

雑誌

社会経済史学 (ISSN:00380113)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.47, no.5, pp.p606-609, 1982-02

著者

山口 和雄

出版者

社会経済史学会

雑誌

社會經濟史學 (ISSN:00380113)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.16, no.1, pp.143-145, 1950-04-15