著者
田端 真弓 山田 理恵
出版者
九州地区国立大学間の連携に係る企画委員会リポジトリ部会
雑誌
研究論文集-教育系・文系の九州地区国立大学間連携論文集- (ISSN:18828728)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.5, no.1, 2011-11

The purpose of this study is to clarify Saito Shintaro’s (1828–1888) ascetic practices focusing on the Ohmura domain. Shintaro was the eldest son of Saito Yakuro (1798–1871), a well-known swordsmanship instructor at the end of the Tokugawa period. Yakuro had established the Rempeikan (dojo), and Shintaro inherited it. He traveled to various feudal domains from 1847 to 1849. Two historical sources, Shoshu Shugyo Eimeiro-ku and Shugyo-chu Shohan Houmei-roku, contain records of his travels. The significance of these sources has not yet been examined. This paper examines the reliability of these sources and presents the following conclusions. (1) These sources indicate the places (feudal domains) and the dates of the visitmade by Shintaro. In particular, most of the records of Kyushu appear in Houmei-roku. (2) The first area visited by him was the Koga domain. The northernmost domain was Matsumae and the southernmost was Hyuga. The Hirado domain and Tsushima domain were the westernmost places. (3)He participated in matches more actively in the north of Kyushu than he did in other districts. (4)His ascetic practices became the turning point in the transformation of the school (ryuha) of swordsmanship in Ohmura.
著者
田端 真弓
出版者
大分大学教育福祉科学部
雑誌
大分大学教育福祉科学部研究紀要 (ISSN:13450875)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.37, no.2, pp.225-240, 2015-10

体育・保健体育科における「集団行動」は,戦前を起点とすることが指摘され,これまでにも体育授業で取り扱うことは妥当でないと批判されてきた。しかし,現行の学習指導要領にもその行動様式が含まれ,それらを補完するように文部科学省の手引きが発行されている。また,運動の特性を踏まえることなく行動様式を美化した授業展開が提案されることもある。本稿では戦後の体育関係者によって展開された「集団行動」をめぐる議論について明らかにし,「集団行動」が指導の対象とされる理由を検討する。これを受けて体育授業のあり方と収斂した。内容は以下のように集約される。「集団行動」の導入にはアメリカ進駐軍の指導とそれによる文部省の通達,教師たちの混乱,児童生徒のモラルのなさが関わっていた。当時の体育教師たちは戦前の教育の影響とそれによる戦後の衝撃から新しい指導法を生み出すことよりも,戦前の秩序運動や教練をモデルとする「集団行動」の指導に回帰することを要望した。これらは能率,安全,秩序など一定の論理により成り立っていた。一方で,歴史的反省,体育授業の本質,教師の快感や美意識に着目し,「集団行動」を批判,危倶する声もあった。これまでにこのような議論を経てきたが,学習指導要領とそれを補完する手引きによる指導の構造は現存している。体育授業は現在,「指導と評価の一体化」の域に到達している。それをめざした体育授業を展開させようとするならば,「集団行動」に費やす時間はないと考えられる。
著者
田端 真弓 山田 理恵
出版者
一般社団法人 日本体育・スポーツ・健康学会
雑誌
体育学研究 (ISSN:04846710)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.56, no.1, pp.143-155, 2011 (Released:2011-07-08)
参考文献数
45

The purpose of this study is to clarify the transformation that occurred in a school (ryuha) of swordsmanship in the domain of Ohmura, Nagasaki, at the end of the Tokugawa period in Japan, focusing particularly on the invitation extended to Saito Kannosuke, one of the leading instructors in the Shinto Munen-ryu (school of swordsmanship), in 1854. This paper was based on two historical materials: Shugyo-chu Shohan Houmei-roku (1849) and Kuyo Jitsuroku (1849-1855). Ohmura Sumihiro, the 12th domanial lord, and Egashira Kandayu, his chief retainer, were tacitly interested in the utility of swordsmanship in Ohmura, and actively proposed the transformation of a school of swordsmanship. In 1854, they invited Kannosuke to act as the swordsmanship instructor. Kannosuke was the third son of Saito Yakuro, a famous instructor of the Shinto Munen-ryu, who had established and managed the Rempeikan, a swordsmanship school (dojo) in Edo. Saito Yakuro's eldest son, Shintaro, had embarked on a journey throughout the domains of Japan in order to train and practice against other warriors there. These training and practice were known as kaikoku-shugyo. Shugyo-chu Shohan Houmei-roku indicates that Shintaro visited many feudal domains, including Ohmura. Ohmura Sumihiro and Egashira Kandayu then became interested in the technique of the Shinto Munen-ryu, which was taught at the Rempeikan, because they considered it to be useful for actual fighting. Afterwards, they succeeded in inviting Kannosuke in 1854, and he became the instructor employed by the domain of Ohmura. His duty was to promote the training of the Shinto Munen-ryu with warriors in Ohmura. In 1855, the Itto-ryu and Shinkage-ryu instructors of swordsmanship were dismissed and forced to stop their teaching. According to Kuyo Jitsuroku, this transformation from the Itto-ryu and the Shinkage-ryu to the Shinto Munen-ryu occurred over a period of six years (from 1849 to 1855). It was brought about to achieve the political ambitions of Ohmura Sumihiro and Egashira Kandayu.
著者
田端 真弓 山田 理恵
出版者
一般社団法人 日本体育・スポーツ・健康学会
雑誌
体育学研究 (ISSN:04846710)
巻号頁・発行日
pp.1104250184, (Released:2011-05-02)
参考文献数
51

The purpose of this study is to clarify the transformation that occurred in a school (ryuha) of swordsmanship in the domain of Ohmura, Nagasaki, at the end of the Tokugawa period in Japan, focusing particularly on the invitation extended to Saito Kannosuke, one of the leading instructors in the Shinto Munen-ryu (school of swordsmanship), in 1854. This paper was based mainly based on two historical materials: Shugyo-chu Shohan Houmei-roku (1849) and Kuyo Jitsuroku (1849-1855). Ohmura Sumihiro, the 12th domanial lord, and Egashira Kandayu, his chief retainer, were tacitly interested in the utility of swordsmanship in Ohmura, and actively proposed the transformation of a school of swordsmanship. In 1854, they invited Kannosuke to act as the swordsmanship instructor. Kannosuke was the third son of Saito Yakuro, a famous instructor of the Shinto Munen-ryu, who had established and managed the Rempeikan, a swordsmanship school (dojo) in Edo. Saito Yakuro's eldest son, Shintaro, had embarked on a journey throughout the domains of Japan in order to train and practice against other warriors there. These training and practice were known as kaikoku-shugyo. Shugyo-chu Shohan Houmei-roku indicates that Shintaro visited many feudal domains, including Ohmura. Ohmura Sumihiro and Egashira Kandayu then became interested in the technique of the Shinto Munen-ryu, which was taught at the Rempeikan, because they considered it to be useful for actual fighting. Afterwards, they succeeded in inviting Kannosuke in 1854, and he became the instructor employed by the domain of Ohmura. His duty was to promote the training of the Shinto Munen-ryu with warriors in Ohmura. In 1855, the Itto-ryu and Shinkage-ryu instructors of swordsmanship were dismissed and forced to stop their teaching. According to Kuyo Jitsuroku, this transformation from the Itto-ryu and the Shinkage-ryu to the Shinto Munen-ryu occurred over a period of six years (from 1849 to 1855). It was brought about to achieve the political ambitions of Ohmura Sumihiro and Egashira Kandayu.
著者
和田 浩一 田端 真弓 都筑 真 永木 耕介 藤坂 由美子
出版者
フェリス女学院大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2013-04-01

本研究は明治前期に刊行された歴史書を分析し、日本が古代オリンピックをいかに受容・解釈したのかに焦点を合わせる。主な成果として、1)ギリシャ史・西洋史・世界史に関する歴史書116冊のうち、73冊に古代オリンピックに関する記述が含まれていたこと、2)古代オリンピックは中等・高等教育における学習課題だったこと、3)当時の知識人たちは古代オリンピックの社会的な機能を日本のスポーツ文化の説明に援用していたこと、が挙げられる。