著者
白石 崇人
出版者
日本科学史学会
雑誌
科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.47, no.246, pp.65-74, 2008 (Released:2021-08-05)

Tei Nishimura planned the Japanese Association for the Advancement of Science in 1888. According to his plan, the association was established through the union of educational, scientific and technological groups. The purpose was to enlighten people on the value of science, promote special research topics, improve the political position of science and scientists, and simplify the dissemination of research outcomes. The model adopted was that of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, although this association had no educational section in the 1880s. Nishimura's plan to unite educational and scientific groups within the association developed from his theory of education, which sought to relate education to science. He hoped for the development of pedagogy, and conducted research on the relationship between education and science. In addition, he thought that the theory of A. Bain was quoted, and that science assisted didactics. He thought that Bain applied psychology, physiology etc. to didactics, and was going to use their scientific method as a practical method. He began the reform of the Educational Society of Japan based on his plan. In 1888, he established a system of consultation with the Ministry of Education, to enable cooperation between science and technological research as well as education, and to conduct research into education.
著者
白石 崇人
出版者
教育史学会
雑誌
日本の教育史学 (ISSN:03868982)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, pp.19-31, 2017 (Released:2018-04-01)
参考文献数
21

The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the significance of education research by elementary school teachers in Japan from 1901 to 1903, through an analysis of Ōse Jintarō’s theory of pedagogy as a science and through activities of the Society for Pedagogy and Educational Methods.In Japan after 1897, why did action-training-research come to be emphasized in education research? Why was school teacher’s education research considered to be linked to pedagogy study? This paper focuses on Ōse’s theory and activities to answer these questions. The Society for Pedagogy and Educational Methods, formed in 1901, is an important resource that provides an understanding of the history and origins of school teacher’s education research. It is necessary to research Ōse’s theory as the basis for this research. How was Ōse’s theory related to the activities of school teachers’ education research and the Society of Pedagogy and Educational Methods?This paper reveals three facts. First, in order to establish pedagogy study as an independent science, Ōse separated research on educational methods from research on the purpose of education, defining teacher education research as educational methods research. Second, influenced by Ernst Meumann’s experimental pedogogy study, Ōse attempted to transform teachers into educational methods researchers. Ōse abandoned experimental psychological research methods. Third, Ōse established the Society for Pedagogy and Educational Methods in order to organize education scholars involved in Higher Normal School, Imperial University, and private schools for education research of pedagogy and educational methods.
著者
丸山 剛史 白石 崇人 内田 徹 船寄 俊雄 笠間 賢二 釜田 史 山本 朗登 大谷 奨 井上 惠美子 亀澤 朋恵
出版者
宇都宮大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2017-04-01

本研究は、第二次大戦前日本の小学校・国民学校教員(以下、初等教員)検定制度の府県比較と中央の初等教員検定関係法令制定・改正過程に関する総合的研究である。府県比較に関しては、北海道、鳥取県、長野県、埼玉県、宮城県、山口県の道県を取り上げた。中央法令制定・改正過程の検討には『公文録』・『公文類聚』等の法令起草・成文関係史料等を用いる。本年度は学制発布から小学校教員検定等ニ関スル規則施行下の時期(1872-1900年)に限定し、検討を行った。検討の結果、次のことが明らかになった。1)府県比較に関して。北海道に関しては、資料調査により北海道道立文書館には初等教員検定関係の史料はほとんど残されていないことが判明したが、北海道教育会の機関誌に初等教員検定制度を活用した教員養成講習会に関する記事が掲載されているほか、合否判定基準等を記した検定内規も掲載されていることがわかった。検定関係規則は「小学校教員検定等ニ関スル細則」、「小学校教員検定細則」等の名称により北海道庁令で規定されていたことも判明した。長野県に関しては、資料調査により長野県立歴史館に『長野県報』、検定関係文書が所蔵されており、特に検定関係文書はこれまで非公開文書が多かったが、問い合わせにより非公開文書のほぼすべてが公開されることになった。また、検定関係規則は長野県令により「小学校教員検定等ニ関スル細則」、「小学校教員検定及免許状ニ関スル細則」、「小学校令及小学校令施行規則実施ニ関スル規程」等の名称により規定されていたことがわかった(他県に関しては文字数の制限により省略)。2)中央法令制定・改正過程の検討に関しては、国立公文書館には画期的な史料は見つけ出すことはできなかったが、府県教育会機関誌等に「小学校教員検定ニ関スル規則」制定過程に言及した記事があることがわかった。
著者
白石 崇人
出版者
教育史学会
雑誌
日本の教育史学 (ISSN:03868982)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, pp.19-31, 2017

<p>The purpose of this paper is to shed light on the significance of education research by elementary school teachers in Japan from 1901 to 1903, through an analysis of Ōse Jintarō's theory of pedagogy as a science and through activities of the Society for Pedagogy and Educational Methods.</p><p>In Japan after 1897, why did action-training-research come to be emphasized in education research? Why was school teacher's education research considered to be linked to pedagogy study? This paper focuses on Ōse's theory and activities to answer these questions. The Society for Pedagogy and Educational Methods, formed in 1901, is an important resource that provides an understanding of the history and origins of school teacher's education research. It is necessary to research Ōse's theory as the basis for this research. How was Ōse's theory related to the activities of school teachers' education research and the Society of Pedagogy and Educational Methods?</p><p>This paper reveals three facts. First, in order to establish pedagogy study as an independent science, Ōse separated research on educational methods from research on the purpose of education, defining teacher education research as educational methods research. Second, influenced by Ernst Meumann's experimental pedogogy study, Ōse attempted to transform teachers into educational methods researchers. Ōse abandoned experimental psychological research methods. Third, Ōse established the Society for Pedagogy and Educational Methods in order to organize education scholars involved in Higher Normal School, Imperial University, and private schools for education research of pedagogy and educational methods.</p>
著者
白石 崇人
出版者
広島大学大学院教育学研究科
雑誌
広島大学大学院教育学研究科紀要 第三部 教育人間科学関連領域 (ISSN:13465562)
巻号頁・発行日
no.55, pp.83-92, 2006
被引用文献数
1

This report aims to clarify how the Educational Society of Japan (Dainihon-Kyouikukai) turned educational research into a business in 1888. Following the directives of the Ministry of Education, Empire University, and journalists, the Educational Society of Japan ventured to organize educational research as a business.
著者
白石 崇人
出版者
一般社団法人日本教育学会
雑誌
教育學研究 (ISSN:03873161)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.75, no.3, pp.263-275, 2008-09-30

本稿の目的は、明治20年代後半(1892〜1896年)における大日本教育会研究組合の成立過程と、その歴史的意義を明らかにすることにある。本論では、当時の高等師範学校存廃問題や教育雑誌における「教育学術研究」の内容、明治25年末から26年における大日本教育会の組織内外の動向を整理し、高師教員を含む教育研究推進派が、研究組合の成立過程で主導権を握ったことを明らかにした。つぎに、嘉納治五郎の大日本教育会改革構想や大日本教育会組合規程を精査し、各研究組合に込められた課題意識を検討した。最後に、研究組合がどのようにこの構想・規程を実現したか、具体的事例を通して検討した。その結果、研究組合の成立は、外国事例の紹介やその斟酌採用に従事しがちだった当時の高師教員に対して、国内の現職教員との研究交流や、日本の実情に合った教授法研究を促すものであったことを明らかにした。
著者
白石 崇人
出版者
中国四国教育学会
雑誌
教育学研究紀要 (ISSN:02871114)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.48, no.1, pp.50-55, 2002
被引用文献数
1
著者
白石 崇人
出版者
日本科学史学会
雑誌
科学史研究. 第II期 (ISSN:00227692)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.47, no.246, pp.65-74, 2008-06-25

Tei Nishimura planned the Japanese Association for the Advancement of Science in 1888. According to his plan, the association was established through the union of educational, scientific and technological groups. The purpose was to enlighten people on the value of science, promote special research topics, improve the political position of science and scientists, and simplify the dissemination of research outcomes. The model adopted was that of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, although this association had no educational section in the 1880s. Nishimura's plan to unite educational and scientific groups within the association developed from his theory of education, which sought to relate education to science. He hoped for the development of pedagogy, and conducted research on the relationship between education and science. In addition, he thought that the theory of A. Bain was quoted, and that science assisted didactics. He thought that Bain applied psychology, physiology etc. to didactics, and was going to use their scientific method as a practical method. He began the reform of the Educational Society of Japan based on his plan. In 1888, he established a system of consultation with the Ministry of Education, to enable cooperation between science and technological research as well as education, and to conduct research into education.