著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, no.1, pp.117-132, 2001-09

著者

城丸 章夫 遠藤 芳信

出版者

千葉大学

雑誌

千葉大学教育学部研究紀要. 第1部 (ISSN:05776856)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.24, pp.83-100, 1975-12-26

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要. 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.2, pp.67-81, 2004-02

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

一般社団法人 日本教育学会

雑誌

教育学研究 (ISSN:03873161)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.1, pp.45-55, 1976-03-30 (Released:2009-01-13)

参考文献数

14

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要. 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.1, pp.103-118, 2008-08

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

一般社団法人日本教育学会

雑誌

日本教育学会大會研究発表要項

巻号頁・発行日

vol.32, 1973-08-28

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

東京大学

雑誌

東京大学教育学部紀要 (ISSN:04957849)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.15, pp.147-163, 1976-03-30

---

The "Military Drill" in this treatise means an education and a drill that the man except for the army enforces the education and drill of the action, technique and knowledge of the battle irfthe army to involve the peculiar object and the educational meaning respectively. What "the man except for the army enforces to involve the peculiar object and the educational meaning" had been enforced, historically, in the sense of the line in the chain of the military preparatory education, first, and the National Education and the Formation of the People, especially, the moral and spiritual building, or the gumnastic, second. As rules for teachiing and a teaching syllabus to come under the category of the above of the "Military Drill" in the school education in Japan, we had had the Particulars of the Army Gumnastic of the Common Middle School in 1886, be for 1910 s, and the Drill in the Teaching Syllabus of the School Gumnastic in 1913 and the Teaching Syllabus of the Drill in 1925, since 1910 s, for example. The "Military Drill" in Japan had aimed at the National Education and the Formation of the People consistently. And, if we analyze the contents and methods of the "Military Drill", firstly we must research into the means of the Formation of the People that the contents and methods of the "Military Drill" involve, and especially we must research into the relation of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience in the contents and methods of the "Military Drill", because, it be able to think that the intentional reletion of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience especially in the social relations is important to the formation of the people and their personalities. So, I will research into the relation of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience in the contents and methods of the "Military Drill". Well, if we begin to analyze the contents and methods of the "Military Drill", first we must investigate the drill regulations for the infantry by way of the base teaching materials of the Drill since 1910s, because, the Drill in the Teaching Syllabus of the School Gumnastic in 1913 had expressed clealy that "the Drill complies with the rules of the drill regulations for the infantry", for example. Namely, the "Military Drill" of the School Education in Japan had been baseed on the drill regulations for the infantry. And, the Drill in the Teaching Syllabus of the School Gumnastic in 1913 had complied with the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909, meanwhile, the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909 had played up the fundamental principle of the editing till the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1940. And, the Revision of the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909 had been editied after the Russo-Japanese War. So, it is necessary for us to investigate the precept and battle on the Russo-Japanese War in the Japanese Army to analyze the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909, and the contents and methods of the "Military Drill" since 1910 s. By reason of the above, in this treatise, I investigate some basic problems of the precept and the battle on the Russo-Japanese War in the Japanese Army together with the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909 within the object of the analysis of the contents and methods of the "Military Drill" since 1910 s. At this time, it is exceedingly important for us to criticize the esteem of the mind and spiritual energy as fidtitious form that had been emphasised in the Japanese Army. And, I have tried to clarify that the Japanese Army had never set value on the mind and spiritual energy in their drill and the education in army. It was not the mind and spiritual energy but the force and violence that the Japanese Army had set value on. Namely, the Japanese Army had payed attention to the meanings of the Formation of the People that the contents and methods of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience (the limitless watch and interference toward the mind and thoughts, the control of the specific type of the action, the scorn of the personality in accordance with the force and violence, the distrust toward the soldier, the negation of the originality of the soldier) in the drill regulations for the infantry and the education in army bring to completion. And, the Military Authorities in Japan would have strengthened the poritical power of the domination in accordance with the magnification of the above Drill (and the Education in Army) throughout all the branch of the National Education, intentionally, and systematically, since the Russo-Japanese War.

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要. 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.2, pp.67-81, 2004-02

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

基盤研究(C)

巻号頁・発行日

2007

---

陸軍の動員計画策定との関係で、補給・兵站体制構築の特質を3点にわたって解明した。第一に、1894年兵站勤務令に関して、1891年戦時編制草案及び1894年戦時大本営編制等との関係を中心にして解明した。第二に、補給・兵站体制の財政的基盤を分析し、特に日清戦争期の諸予算編成と会計経理の体制構築を解明した。第三に、日清戦争開始期の第五師団の動員と混成旅団の編成を解明し、さらに朝鮮国内における混成旅団の兵站体制構築開始の特質を解明した。

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要. 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.58, no.2, pp.57-72, 2008-02

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要. 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.54, no.1, pp.125-140, 2003-09-30

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要, 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.1, pp.103-118, 2008-08

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

東京大学教育学部

雑誌

東京大学教育学部紀要 (ISSN:04957849)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.15, pp.147-163, 1976-03-30

---

The "Military Drill" in this treatise means an education and a drill that the man except for the army enforces the education and drill of the action, technique and knowledge of the battle irfthe army to involve the peculiar object and the educational meaning respectively. What "the man except for the army enforces to involve the peculiar object and the educational meaning" had been enforced, historically, in the sense of the line in the chain of the military preparatory education, first, and the National Education and the Formation of the People, especially, the moral and spiritual building, or the gumnastic, second. As rules for teachiing and a teaching syllabus to come under the category of the above of the "Military Drill" in the school education in Japan, we had had the Particulars of the Army Gumnastic of the Common Middle School in 1886, be for 1910 s, and the Drill in the Teaching Syllabus of the School Gumnastic in 1913 and the Teaching Syllabus of the Drill in 1925, since 1910 s, for example. The "Military Drill" in Japan had aimed at the National Education and the Formation of the People consistently. And, if we analyze the contents and methods of the "Military Drill", firstly we must research into the means of the Formation of the People that the contents and methods of the "Military Drill" involve, and especially we must research into the relation of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience in the contents and methods of the "Military Drill", because, it be able to think that the intentional reletion of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience especially in the social relations is important to the formation of the people and their personalities. So, I will research into the relation of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience in the contents and methods of the "Military Drill". Well, if we begin to analyze the contents and methods of the "Military Drill", first we must investigate the drill regulations for the infantry by way of the base teaching materials of the Drill since 1910s, because, the Drill in the Teaching Syllabus of the School Gumnastic in 1913 had expressed clealy that "the Drill complies with the rules of the drill regulations for the infantry", for example. Namely, the "Military Drill" of the School Education in Japan had been baseed on the drill regulations for the infantry. And, the Drill in the Teaching Syllabus of the School Gumnastic in 1913 had complied with the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909, meanwhile, the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909 had played up the fundamental principle of the editing till the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1940. And, the Revision of the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909 had been editied after the Russo-Japanese War. So, it is necessary for us to investigate the precept and battle on the Russo-Japanese War in the Japanese Army to analyze the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909, and the contents and methods of the "Military Drill" since 1910 s. By reason of the above, in this treatise, I investigate some basic problems of the precept and the battle on the Russo-Japanese War in the Japanese Army together with the Drill Regulations for the Infantry in 1909 within the object of the analysis of the contents and methods of the "Military Drill" since 1910 s. At this time, it is exceedingly important for us to criticize the esteem of the mind and spiritual energy as fidtitious form that had been emphasised in the Japanese Army. And, I have tried to clarify that the Japanese Army had never set value on the mind and spiritual energy in their drill and the education in army. It was not the mind and spiritual energy but the force and violence that the Japanese Army had set value on. Namely, the Japanese Army had payed attention to the meanings of the Formation of the People that the contents and methods of the combination on the human about the rule and obedience (the limitless watch and interference toward the mind and thoughts, the control of the specific type of the action, the scorn of the personality in accordance with the force and violence, the distrust toward the soldier, the negation of the originality of the soldier) in the drill regulations for the infantry and the education in army bring to completion. And, the Military Authorities in Japan would have strengthened the poritical power of the domination in accordance with the magnification of the above Drill (and the Education in Army) throughout all the branch of the National Education, intentionally, and systematically, since the Russo-Japanese War.

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要, 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.58, no.2, pp.57-72, 2008-02

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要, 人文科学・社会科学編 (ISSN:13442562)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.60, no.2, pp.25-40, 2010-02

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

北海道教育大学紀要. 第一部. C, 教育科学編 (ISSN:03864499)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.44, no.1, pp.97-106, 1993-07

著者

遠藤 芳信

出版者

北海道教育大学

雑誌

基盤研究(C)

巻号頁・発行日

2001

---

本研究課題名は「近代日本の要塞築造と防衛体制構築の研究」ということで、1910年要塞防禦教令の成立過程を中心に実証的に考祭を深めてきた。この結果、3年間にわたる本研究の実績と成果としては、下記の4点をあげることができる。第一に、1910年要塞防禦教令はその頒布(限定部数、閲覧者制限等)と保管自体が厳密な機密保護体制の下に管理されてきたので、参謀本部及び要塞司令部の限定された業務従事者のみが閲覧・調査・審議等の対象にすることができただけである。これによって、近代日本における要塞防禦の意味等の公開的な議論・研究はほぼ完全に閉ざされてきたということができる。これに対して、本研究は、1902年要塞防禦教令草案と1910年要塞防禦教令の各款項等が意味する内容を初めて解明・考察したことになる。第二に、1910年要塞防禦教令は日露戦争前の1902年要塞防禦教令草案の特に「編冊草案」の記載事項と比較するならば、戦備を基準にして、戦備実施、要塞守備隊配置、防禦戦闘等に関してかなり整理・整備した規定を示したことである。第三に、1910年要塞防禦教令は要塞内の民政・警察事項等の規定においては、1882年の戒厳令制定段階においては特に合囲地境内の具体的な戒厳業務が必ずしも明確でなかったのに対して、軍隊側の戒厳業務内容(地方行政機関との関係、治安維持対策、住民避難、給養・衛生、住民の軍務従事等)の具体的な考え方を示したことである。第四に、クラウゼヴィッツが指摘するように、常備軍建設以降には要塞の自然的な住民保護の自的が忘れ去られていくが、1910年要塞防禦教令の成立過程をみると、日露戦争後直後には、部分的には要塞の自然的な住民保護の議論は潜在化していたものと考えてよい。