著者
栗田 禎子 長澤 榮治 水島 多喜男 阿久津 正幸 小林 春夫 鈴木 規夫 阿久津 正幸 清水 学 千代崎 未央 平野 淳一 湯川 武
出版者
千葉大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2013-04-01

従来、現代中東の社会運動をめぐる研究では、専らいわゆる「イスラーム主義」運動のみが脚光を浴びる傾向があったが、本研究では中東におけるマルクス主義の問題に着目し、その展開過程の特質を、運動、思想、歴史的・社会的背景という角度から分析した。研究の結果、中東のマルクス主義はこの地域の置かれた社会的・経済的現実と対峙し、地域に根ざした「知」の伝統(アラブ・イスラーム哲学の蓄積等)とも対話・格闘しながら発展してきたものであり、欧米からの単なる「移植」の産物ではないことが明らかになった。また、中東の社会・政治のあり方に関する従来の固定的・静態的イメージの見直しを行なうことができた。
著者
阿久津 正幸
出版者
日本中東学会
雑誌
日本中東学会年報 (ISSN:09137858)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.26, no.1, pp.241-268, 2010-07-15 (Released:2018-03-30)

Several modern studies have treated the ulamā as quasi-bureaucrats, influential urban elites, distinguished families, etc. However, I attempt to consider them mainly as professional intellectuals, regardless of their social position, in order to disclose the Islamic nature of the society that they established. First, we need to reveal their “institution” for the transmission of ilm, partly because the ulamā could not have been passed down (succession) without this process and partly because Islamic society should be understood on the basis of Arabic-Islamic values, not a non-Arabic-Islamic bias. How the changing situation in society has been approved by the professional ulamā and the evaluation of social environments that led to such attitudes of intellectuals are discussions related to this point. As indicated previously, an interdisciplinary attempt (historical sociology in this case) is necessary to look beyond the existing sense of values in Middle Eastern studies.
著者
阿久津 正幸
出版者
一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会
雑誌
オリエント (ISSN:00305219)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.45, no.2, pp.165-183, 2002 (Released:2010-03-12)

In fear of the extinction of the knowledge and the death of scholars, Umayyad Caliph Umar II is reported in hadith to have said, “Pick up the traditions of the Messenger of God and write them down” (Sahin al-Bukhari, Chap. of 'Ilm, §34). This report makes clear the fact that manuscripts of Islamic religious sciences are media for preserving records and also means for transmitting knowledge to the next generation. Many studies are now beginning to stress the peculiar nature of the person-to-person style in Muslim traditional education and regard Muslim education as a cultural practice. As a result, written material (i. e. the manuscript) has not attracted broader interest among modern historians of Muslim education except for the revision and compilation of certain texts. Although, when we focus on how learners receive educational contents of the religious sciences, we can say, even in the above-mentioned hadith, that written material does not necessarily lose its importance. Rather, we should be aware that it is indispensable material in Muslim education.First of all in this brief article, I will introduce information about the Catalogue of Arabic Manuscripts that was accumulated in Aleppo up until the mid-20th century. The Manuscripts were kept in the library called Dar al-Maktabat al-Waqfiyya al-Islamiyya, which was located in al-Madrasa al-Sharafiyya next to al-Jami'al-Kabtr. Its catalogue consists of 8 collections; each had been historically collected in religious waqf institutions (jami', masjid, madrasa etc.). The catalogue was arranged finally by the hand of a religious scholar of Aleppo, Ahmad b. Muhammad b. Saradar, and the collections were administered under him until they were transferred to the Asad Library in Damascus by governmental decree in 1986.In addition to providing a short history of the manuscripts and libraries, I will try to indicate a few possibilities about the “archaeology of the manuscript.” Through a short survey of Islamic writing and book history, while considering the study of historical sources, I would like to emphasize as a hypothesis that the manuscript could be regarded as being document-like evidence reflecting the actual learning activities of scholars and students. This research would open a way, beyond our lack of historical sources, to understand the curriculum in pratique at the place of education in Islamic history.
著者
阿久津 正幸
出版者
慶應義塾大学
雑誌
史学 (ISSN:03869334)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.69, no.1, pp.141-158, 1999-08

研究ノート1 はじめに2 研究の視点3 政治性の指摘の実状4 組織的高等教育施設の強調と政治性の軽視5 組織・制度的教育施設への批判6 「教育」の社会史的考察7 おわりに : 脱「支配の正当化」の枠組みに向けて