著者

森川 孝典

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, no.3, pp.409-426, 1983-01

---

論文

著者

金澤 裕之

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.71, no.4, 2002

著者

江坂 輝弥

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.60, no.2, pp.243-252, 1991

---

報告第二回座談会三田史学の百年を語る

著者

岩谷 十二郎

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.31, no.1, pp.365-387, 1958

---

慶應義塾創立百年記念論文集Alessandro Valignano S. J. showed us in the detailed picture, entitled "Historia del principio y progresso de la Compania de Jesus en las Indias Orientales", the navigation between Lisbon and Goa, and also the difficulties from which the people had suffered. He classified them into two parts: hardships in daily life, and perils which fell during this navigation; and further sorted both of them into six, respectively, i.e., the former into: 1. lack of accomodation, 2. food, 3. clothes, 4. hardships from becalmed ships, 5. lack of water, 6. disease ; while the latter into: 1. tempest, 2. reef, 3. fire at sea, 4. French pirates, 5. lack of water, 6. death. In recent years, Europeans have made all sorts of studies of his work, and particularly those who are inter- ested in studying the biography of S. Francis Xavier can not fail to disregard them. This is an evident fact that his sharp-eyed analysis and accuracy came to gain a high reputation as historical material. The present article which is chiefly based on Valignano's work tries to give a brief sketch of the actual condition and various difficulties they had to face during the voyages on Portuguese vessels from Lisbon to Goa.

著者

武田 勝藏

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.1, no.3, pp.440-456, 1922-05

---

(一) 藏書印(二) 文庫印

著者

大嶽 卓弘

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.53, no.4, pp.321-337, 1984-03

---

論文III 人民保守派の成立 1 対立の激化と勢力の逆転 2 ヤング案問題と人民保守派の成立IV 結びに替えて

著者

前嶋 信次

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.32, no.1, pp.1-37, 1959-04

---

一 突騎施可汗蘇禄二 蘇禄の全盛時代三 唐朝と蘇禄四 蘇禄の死五 黄姓と黑姓六 唐の對突騎施政策の一轉七 莫賀達干の運命八 唐軍の潰滅結語This chapter begins with the activities of Su Lu, Khaqan of Turgesh Turks. He engaged in successive battles for about sixteen years with the Arabs on one side and with the Chinese on the other. But, after he was murdered by Baga Tarkhan (Kursul) in 738, the Turgesh Turks splitted into two parties, Black (Kara) Turgesh and Yellow Turgesh. At first, the authorities of T'ang dynasty supported the yellow party, but afterwards changed their policy and helped the black party. The battle of the Talas between the Arabs under Abbasid Caliphate and the Chinese of T'ang occurred amid the Turgesh territory in 751 after the expedition of Chinese frontier general Kao Hsien-shih to Shash (present Tashkent in Tajik SSR). However, as to the reason why the Chinese gave such a chastisement on the king of Shash, the descriptions of Chinese historians do not coincide with those of Arab chroniclers. The Chinese sources say that general Kao punished severely the king of Shash because the latter neglected the duty as a subordinate state. Ibn al-Athir, Arab historian in the 13th century, stated that the king of Farghana came into conflict with the king of Shash, the former asked for aid to the Emperor of China who sent a large force to besiege the capital of Shash and that Abu Muslim dispatched one of his generals to rescue the besieged. In my opinion, both of these records, Chinese and Arab, are not sufficient to explain the real cause of the accident. I think that Kao Hsien-shih punished the king of Shash because the latter was the most fervent helper of Yellow Turgesh, while the policy of T'ang at that time was to support the other Black Turgesh.

著者

前嶋 信次

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.31, no.1, pp.657-691, 1958

---

慶應義塾創立百年記念論文集はしがき一 二大勢力の接近二 西突厥故地の經營三 波斯の滅亡と吐火羅四 第三勢力としての吐蕃五 碎葉城の護り六 クタイバ・イブン・ムスリム七 フェルガーナの運命The battle at Talas in Central Asia, fought between the Chinese army of T'any dynasty and the Arab and Iranian troups of Abbassid Caliphate in 751 A.D., was not only significant from political and military standpoints, but it produced various interesting effects on the history of cultural intercourse between the West and the East. But the Chinese sources concerning this event are comparatively poor and the Arabic sources astonishingly scarce. The researches into the history of Heart of Asia in this period are admirably executed by E. Chavannes, W. Barthold, H.A.R. Gibl and other scholars. However, we cannot find any monograph which treats particularly this serious encounter. In my opinion, there still remain considerable parts to complement the studies of the predecessors. In this preliminary chapter, I wish to re-examine the relations and contacts between T'any dynasty and the Caliphate from the beginning to the day of Talas. As to the direct causes of the incident and the relating circumstances, I intend to publish my opinion shortly in the SHIGAKU, historical quarterly of Keio University.

著者

長谷川 次郎

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.42, no.3, pp.361-362, 1970-02

---

発表要旨彙報

著者

石田 恵子

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, no.4, pp.431-459, 1975

---

論文序一 六世紀のアッティカ二 Kleisthenesと民衆の提携三 新部族制改革の内容 (一) 区 (a) 区 (b) 区とフラトリア (二) トリッテュス (三) 部族 (a) 新部族組織の特殊性 (b) 新部族組織の目的四 五百人評議会 (一) 評議会員の選出方法 (二) 評議会の権限五 Kleisthenesの「貴族政」六 五〇一/〇年の改革 (一) アルコン (二) 将軍 (a) 将軍と民衆 (b) 将軍と貴族結Kleisthenes has often regarded as a founder of Athenian Democracy. Some historians have suggested that he sought by his reforms to put an end to regional struggles and to give a blow to the noble forces. Therefore, in his reforms, the democratic side has a tendency to be emphasized. But, did he really intend to break down the noble forces? Surely, he turned to the demes in order to have their support. At first he reorganized the tribes and satisfied their prospect of local self-government in a deme-system. However, according to our evidence, he never touched the Phratries. In the demes, the Phratries and the tribes, he could ensure the excellent position to the nobility. Next, he established the new council of five hundred. Even in this, and then, in the Strategia, the nobility could control the real policy. It seems that Kleisthenes manipulated the demes and created his institution on the compromise with the nobility. In this way, although in the institution he gave equal political rights to all demes, in fact he did the nobility a special favor and ensured their traditional rights. Therefore, we must emphasize the aristocratic side in his reforms. Indeed the nobility was no longer the privileged class, but Athenian Democracy in the fifth century which was founded on by Kleisthenes, reminds us of the control by the nobiles in Rome.

著者

八景 義行

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, no.1, 1991

著者

佐藤 正幸

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, no.2, pp.145-171, 1974

---

論文序(1) 説明の論理構造的側面 (a) 演繹的側面 (b) 確率的モデル(2) 説明の経験科学的な側面(3) 説明の実際的な側面結びDuring the past three decades, many philosophers and historians have been occupied with the "Analytical Philosophy of History", concentrating on the problem of historical explanation. The work as it has been carried on has yielded much fruit particularly by helping to elucidate the nature of history and historical writing. Being a student of history, it has been to my regret that the above has been primarily restricted to the realm of philosophical concern. And those few historians who have recently shown an interest in the philosophical problem as related to history have moved too rapidly in applying philosophical conclusions to the analysis of their own discipline ; at the cost of systematic ivestigation and analysis, to which their own discipline is deserving. Given the present situation, I would suggest two alternatives in which the current problem could be dealt with. One is through the analysis of "historical imagination" which I believe in the long run is capable of regulating historical writing. The second approach being the "analysis of historiography from a theoretical point of view". While the two above disciplines have a complementary relationship to approach the multitude of problems surrounding the nature of history, this paper will concentrate on the second alternative, particularly as it is applied to those tasks within the confines of the application of theoretical discussion as it pertains to the analysis of historiography. Systematic theory of explanation to the analysis of history requires a three stage structure ; (1) logical stage of explanation, (2) empirical stage of explanation, and (3) actual stage of explanation. While the first stage gives itself to the purely logical or syntactical, which is given by the Hempel-Oppenheim's covering-law theory of explanation, It is in the second stage that the concept of "time" enters first, which because of it's nature, as related to the "law-statement", is divided into three different types; (a) law of succeession, (b) law of coexistence, and (c) law of precedence. It is a primary conclusion of this paper that the central problem is within the core of type (c), the law of precedence. NOTE: The above conclusion has two conditions, given that this law statement is supportable through, (1); the presented works of E. Nagel and R. Rudner; which conclude that this law statement can be reduced to the above (a)'s law statement. (2); That the explanations in this stage are admitted to as a scientific explanation and that these can be reduced to the first syntactical structure. In the concluding third stage, "the analysis of the actual work of history writing" is in my opinion primarily one of "stage reduction". This conclusion was reached following my examination and analysis of W. Dray's work, "Continuous-Series Explanation", to which various types of historical essays are included within the model. A model when given due consideration, in my opinion, reveals a logical analysis that lends itself creditably to the proposition that the third stage can be reduced to the first and second stage's. While many problems continue to plague the serious student of Historical Explanation, it is none-the-less the contention of this paper that far more thrust must be given to the endeavour of reaching the realm of "The Analytical Philosophy of History", a realm I might add which when reached however will provide the much needed light with which to explore the current dimly lit field of the "Theoretical Foundations of Analysis of History Writing for the Establishment of Historography".

著者

前嶋 信次

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.40, no.2, pp.425-447, 1967-11

---

松本信廣先生古稀記念According to, Marco Polo, the Mongols, led by Nescradin, defeated an army of the king of Burma at Uniain (Yungch'ang Fu in Yunnan Province) and captured many elephants. Polo said that from that battle Qubilai Khan began to have elephants in plenty for his armies, though before he had none for the army. But, through the whole history of China, we can find no record of the use of elephants in warfare, except a king of Ch'u 楚 who used them to scare away the soldiers of Wu 呉 when the latters besieged his capital in 506 B.C. Besides, the Chinese sources concerning the battle between the Mongols and the Burmese in 1277 are not consistent with the account of Polo in various points. Therefore some scholars went so far to doubt or even to deny the veracity and credibility of the latter. The writer of this article compared the Chinese sources with the narrative of Polo and reached the conclusion that the both are supplemental to each other and not always incompatible.

著者

橋本 増吉

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.16, no.4, pp.499-527, 1938-04

著者

鈴木 泰平

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.35, no.2, pp.227-240, 1962-12

---

間崎万里先生頌寿記念It is a very well known fact what a great influence the French Revolution had on the formation of the German State and her people. However, it may be stated that there were practically no one who understood sufficiently the historical significance of the progress of the Revolution. During this period, it is said, that Goethe alone understood the world historical significance of the Revolution, but so far as his works are concerned, one cannot always say that he really had complete understanding. After all, for Goethe, it might be stated that, outside of pursuing the humanities, he had almost no interest in the historical events of his time. To understand and evaluate sufficiently the Revolution and its historical significance, it was necessary to wait for the emergence of the German Romanticism.

著者

柳田 利夫

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, no.3, pp.401-415, 1992

---

一 はじめに二 「梨子盗難事件」三 スペイン側の抗議四 神奈川県裁判所の回答五 むすび

著者

山口 房司

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.63, no.4, pp.403-429, 1994-08

---

(一) はじめに(二) シャーマン反トラスト法制定百年目の周辺(三) 「見えざる手」と「目に見える手」(四) 「条理の法則」への道(五) おわりに

著者

山口 房司

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.59, no.1, pp.1-31, 1990-03

---

論文(一) はじめに(二) ボイコットの背景と経過(三) アメリカ鉄道組合と総括支配人協会(四) ストライキとデブス差止め命令(五) 連邦軍派遣とイリノイ州知事(六) おわりに

著者

東畑 隆介

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.49, no.4, pp.339-360, 1980-03

---

本稿は、ハノーファー国王エルンスト・アヴグストによる憲法廃止を契機として生じたハノーファー王国の憲法紛争の一環として、ゲッティンゲン大学の七教授が王の憲法廃止に抗議し、罷免された「ゲッティンゲン七教授事件」を考察しようとするものである。この事件に関しては、既に千代田寛教授が大部の論文を発表していられる。千代田教授は主として大学史の観点からこの事件を考察しておられるが、事件の憲法史的側面をも詳細に記述しておられる。従って、この事件に関して、私が付け加えることの出来る余地は殆んどないように思われる。しかし、この事件は、ドイツにおいても有名な割りに本格的な研究書に乏しいため、事実的な経過に関して必ずしもよく知られていないように思われるので、本稿では、事件の事実的な経過を出来るだけ詳細に記述することに留意した。

著者

井手 一馬

出版者

慶應義塾大学

雑誌

史学 (ISSN:03869334)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.8, no.2, pp.285-294, 1929-08