著者
森田 孟
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
成城文藝 (ISSN:02865718)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.189, pp.55-30, 2005-01-25
著者
篠川 賢 鈴木 正信
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
基盤研究(C)
巻号頁・発行日
2014-04-01

国造制と伴造制は七世紀以前における大和王権の地方支配の中核をなす制度であり、大和王権の権力構造および古代国家の成立過程を解明するために不可欠な研究テーマである。本研究では、「伴造関係史料集」および「伴造関係文献目録」の作成と、「国造・伴造研究支援データベース」構築のためのテキストデータの作成を行った。また、国造制と伴造制の関係性に関する研究を実施した。
著者
津上 英輔
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
成城美学美術史 = Studies in aesthetics & art history (ISSN:13405861)
巻号頁・発行日
no.17, pp.1-15, 2012-03

R. G. Collingwood in The Principles of Art (1938) discusses Plato's theory of poetry in Republic 10, coming to the general conclusion that not poetry as a whole but only the representative part of it was banished from his ideal state. The three footnotes (pages 46 and 48) given in this connection on grammatical interpretation of specific passages in the original Greek text catch the reader's eye with their disproportionate minuteness. This paper attempts to make clear his motive for this by examining his reading of the original passages as well as the framework in which the subject is dealt with in The Principles of Art, by comparing it with his earlier essay "Plato's Philosophy of Art", to which he expressly refers in one of the three notes, and by matching his theory of art and representation with that of Plato's. These investigations show that Collingwood, while mostly keeping sound in philological terms, wanted to interpret Plato's criticism of representation to conform to his own conception of it. According to Collingwood, Plato failed to distinguish between magical representation and amusement representation, with the result that Plato attacked representation at large, instead, as he should, of amusement representation only. It was under such a scheme that the modern philosopher gave the seemingly superfluous philological notes.R. G. Collingwood in The Principles of Art (1938) discusses Plato's theory of poetry in Republic 10, coming to the general conclusion that not poetry as a whole but only the representative part of it was banished from his ideal state. The three footnotes (pages 46 and 48) given in this connection on grammatical interpretation of specific passages in the original Greek text catch the reader's eye with their disproportionate minuteness. This paper attempts to make clear his motive for this by examining his reading of the original passages as well as the framework in which the subject is dealt with in The Principles of Art, by comparing it with his earlier essay "Plato's Philosophy of Art", to which he expressly refers in one of the three notes, and by matching his theory of art and representation with that of Plato's. These investigations show that Collingwood, while mostly keeping sound in philological terms, wanted to interpret Plato's criticism of representation to conform to his own conception of it. According to Collingwood, Plato failed to distinguish between magical representation and amusement representation, with the result that Plato attacked representation at large, instead, as he should, of amusement representation only. It was under such a scheme that the modern philosopher gave the seemingly superfluous philological notes.
著者
大森 弘喜
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
成城大學經濟研究 (ISSN:03874753)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.162, pp.279-314, 2003-11-20
著者
津上 英輔
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
成城美学美術史 (ISSN:13405861)
巻号頁・発行日
no.19, pp.1-19, 2013-03

ρυθμο[s] is one of the three media (εν ετεροι[s]) of poetry Aristotle names besides words and melody in the Poetics (1447a8-b29). The Italian philologist Pier Vettori in his Commentarii in primum librum Aristotelis de Arte Poetarum (1560), which contains his own Greek text, followed by its verbatim Latin translation and comprehensive running commentary on textual, grammatical and interpretative topics, identifies it with dance, instead of rhythm as it is commonly held. Vettori was led to this (mis-)conception through two factors: (i) his supposition, conforming to the then current notion, that all poetry was verse (words with metre), with the consequence that metre, present, according to his view, in every poem, belongs to words, not rhythm; and more importantly (ii) the limited knowledge scholars in the sixteenth century commanded about the sources of the Poetics, without the aid of the Arabic version, from which modern editors have substantially benefited. Since both factors were historically conditioned, the resulting misunderstanding of Vettori's was more of a historical nature than his personal.ρυθμο[s] is one of the three media (εν ετεροι[s]) of poetry Aristotle names besides words and melody in the Poetics (1447a8-b29). The Italian philologist Pier Vettori in his Commentarii in primum librum Aristotelis de Arte Poetarum (1560), which contains his own Greek text, followed by its verbatim Latin translation and comprehensive running commentary on textual, grammatical and interpretative topics, identifies it with dance, instead of rhythm as it is commonly held. Vettori was led to this (mis-)conception through two factors: (i) his supposition, conforming to the then current notion, that all poetry was verse (words with metre), with the consequence that metre, present, according to his view, in every poem, belongs to words, not rhythm; and more importantly (ii) the limited knowledge scholars in the sixteenth century commanded about the sources of the Poetics, without the aid of the Arabic version, from which modern editors have substantially benefited. Since both factors were historically conditioned, the resulting misunderstanding of Vettori's was more of a historical nature than his personal.
著者
小島 孝之
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
成城国文学 (ISSN:09110941)
巻号頁・発行日
no.32, pp.28-45, 2016-03
著者
恩田 裕
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
教養論集 (ISSN:03898075)
巻号頁・発行日
no.12, pp.104-63, 1995-12
著者
小平 裕
出版者
成城大学
雑誌
経済研究所年報 (ISSN:09161023)
巻号頁・発行日
no.25, pp.123-139, 2012-04