著者

岡村 祐 野原 卓 田中 暁子

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会技術報告集 (ISSN:13419463)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.21, no.49, pp.1241-1246, 2015

---

Open House is a program, where multiple houses are open to the public simultaneously within a specific area. This research focuses on this program held in Japan and analyses what organisers are aiming at through it and how they approach relevant stakeholders. As a result, it reveals that at an Open House a variety type of events are normally arranged in order to promote totality of architecture and life and work and area value created based on architecture and to provide an opportunity for multiple stakeholders to be involved in local resources management utilising building stocks.

著者

岡村 祐 野原 卓 田中 暁子

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会技術報告集 (ISSN:13419463)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.21, no.47, pp.317-320, 2015

---

This study focuses on homeowners opening their property to the public at Open House London. On the basis of questionnaire it finally reveals their motivation and role. Close cooperation between a homeowner and an associated architect made a decision of participation and hosted many visitors by providing a guided tour, etc. Homeowners fully understood an organizer's concept "quality of architecture design" and took a responsibility of educating citizens instead of aiming at gaining economical or social benefit or regarding it as an opportunity to start something new. Such a homeowner in fact has repeatedly participated, which makes this program attractive.

著者

神原 康介 窪田 亜矢 黒瀬 武史 田中 暁子 道喜 開視

出版者

日本建築学会

雑誌

日本建築学会計画系論文集 (ISSN:13404210)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.81, no.724, pp.1333-1343, 2016

被引用文献数

1

---

Akahama in Otsuchi, Iwate prefecture is one of the areas severely damaged by the Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami (3.11). A purpose of this paper is to clarify how residents used the evacuation places and shelters from emergency evacuation phase to refugee life phase in 3.11 in relation to the transition of disaster preparedness places and the transition of daily gathering places in order to get the suggestion about how to design a disaster preparedness place. In chapter 2, it is clarified that how evacuation places were used in three phases. In emergency evacuation phase, many residents evacuated to an elementary school, but there was flooded and many people got wet. In temporarily shelter use phase, residents could find a printing office near the school and about 140 people stayed there for 3 days. Many residents went to private houses and stayed. 3-chome residents could not find large facilities, so they went to a neighboring village. In refuge life phase, about 80 residents used the gymnasium of school, about 20 residents used welfare facility and 8 households used 2 vacant houses that were owned by Otsuchi-cho. In chapter 3 and 4, transition of disaster preparedness places and daily gathering places are clarified. In chapter 3, findings are as follows. 1) A damage of past tsunami was recorded, but evacuation behaviors or the places where people gathered was not passed down. 2) the understanding that a school was designated as a disaster preparedness place was widely shared. 3) In the late 80's, a numbers of preparedness place increased because of expansion of village. 4) In the late 90's, 1-chome's preparedness place was gathered to a school because a new gymnasium was built. 5) In the late 2000's, local organization decided that Akahama had 3 prepared places in terms of governance after a discussion that Hachiman Shrine didn't have a enough space. In chapter 4, findings are as follows. 1) A school and Community center had been the base of Akahama community. 2) A school had been the base of community, and that's why a school became center of disaster preparedness place in spite that there was not evacuation place during Sanriku tsunami of 1933. 3) A community center had been the base of community and located a little higher ground, and that's why disaster prevention materials was stocked before 3.11. In chapter 5, evacuation places and shelters in 3.11 are analyzed in three phases in relation to the transition of disaster preparedness place and daily gathering place. It is found that in emergency evacuation phase, a school had been known as a preparedness place in spite that in the past there was not evacuation place and gymnasium was located in dead end, and in 3.11 many residents were exposed to danger. In temporarily shelter use phase and refuge life phase, it can be necessary to think preparedness place not only inner village but also wider area, etc. In chapter 6, the following four points are suggested. 1) It is important to think the role of disaster preparedness place in the disaster phases. 2) Changes of a village environment and modernization of daily gathering place influence a numbers and characteristics of disaster preparedness place. 3) The actual condition of evacuation behavior such as gathering places in past tsunami disaster is necessary to be come up for discussion about the disaster prepared. 4) For the occurrence of a gap between evacuation places and disaster preparedness place, residential network is needed for a use of private houses or facilities, and also vacant ones owned by municipality should be prepared for an emergency evacuation.

著者

田中 暁龍

出版者

東京大学史料編纂所

雑誌

東京大学史料編纂所研究紀要 (ISSN:09172416)

巻号頁・発行日

no.27, pp.32-46, 2017-03

著者

中島 伸 田中 暁子 初田 香成

出版者

一般財団法人 住総研

雑誌

住総研研究論文集 (ISSN:21878188)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.41, pp.181-192, 2015

---

本研究は,城南住宅組合を対象に組合活動を通時的に分析し,住環境を下支えしてきた土地所有の状況など明らかにすることで,住環境の形成・維持へとつながる住民主体のまちづくりへの知見を得ることである。組合の活動記録の一次史料と土地所有形態の変遷を調べることで,理想的田園生活を目指した城南住宅組合は当初こそ別荘利用の形態で住宅地化が進まなかったものの,戦中,戦後より住宅地として居住実態が伴ってくると,当初より定めた規約による各住宅地での環境整備が進んだ。共同借地経営の住宅組合という組織ではあるが,土地所有など前提となる経営基盤が大きく変化する中で,住環境維持を目標にしつつも,居住者のコミュニティ活動を相互補完的に行う中で,組織活動を継続してきていることがわかった。

著者

神原 康介 萩原 拓也 田中 暁子 黒瀬 武史 窪田 亜矢

出版者

一般社団法人日本建築学会

雑誌

学術講演梗概集 (ISSN:18839363)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.2013, pp.655-656, 2013-08-30

著者

西尾 勝 新藤 宗幸 三宅 博史 五石 敬路 高井 正 棚橋 匡 木村 佳弘 川手 摂 田中 暁子 萬野 利恵 畑野 勇 小石川 裕介

出版者

公益財団法人後藤・安田記念東京都市研究所

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2010

---

本研究は、「平成の市町村合併」が一段落した現時点において、「平成の市町村合併」がなにをもたらしたのかについて、多面的に把握するために、地域区分変更に関する国際比較を行うとともに、行政(職員数、職種別職員数、行政組織、施設)、財政(普通会計、特別会計、公営企業)及び住民負担、政治(議会議員及び首長の属性)について、それぞれデータベースを作成した。併せて、中央省庁、都道府県、市町村の合併事務担当者などにヒアリング調査を行った。「合併」の効果と喧伝された諸事項は、非合併自治体との比較ではあまり見ることはできなかった。また、行政と住民の距離感が開くなどの「合併の弊害」と想定された項目に対する定数特例や選挙区、地域自治組織などの諸措置は、措置自体の時限性や行政改革の帰結として、事実上剥落していった。以上の分析結果から、「平成の市町村合併」とは、「究極の行財政改革」を市町村に推進させるためのツールであった、と評価できる。

著者

田中 暁龍

出版者

桜美林大学

雑誌

桜美林論集 (ISSN:13427830)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.36, pp.89-107, 2009