著者
福間 聡
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.24, pp.49-62, 2001-03-20 (Released:2018-04-25)
参考文献数
25

This article focuses on sell-ownership and articulates it. Libertarians insist that my person is my property, and I have exclusive rights to determine the course of its use and disposal, and further to enjoy full income gained by its use. But self-ownership is an obscure conception inasmuch as the very concept of person and the legal concept of property in themselves allow for varied interpretations. Through examining what a person is, and by noting our abilities, I divide them into two concepts, which may be called ‘intrinsic ability’ and ‘extrinsic one’. According to this division, in order to redefine self-ownership, I argue that we claim only the ‘right to integrity of person’ to the intrinsic ability, and ‘control right and restricted income right’ to extrinsic ability.
著者
真船 えり
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.21, pp.5-19, 1998-04-01 (Released:2018-04-25)

This paper aims to clarify some of the intentions of Hume's arguments concerning the mind-body problem in his Treatise of Human Nature, I, iv, 5. It attempts to examine three main things: (1) the features of Hume's argu­ments compared with those of Locke; (2) Hume's own use of the words, such as ‘notion’, ‘fiction’ or ‘feign’, and ‘imagination’ or ‘fancy’; and (3) Hume's new method of explanation in terms of human nature on the problem concern­ing a conjunction of mind and body in place. In the course of these examina­tions, it will be shown that Hume's sceptical arguments suggest a new solution on the problem concerned, and lead to the naturalism, presented in the light of human nature.
著者
末冨 浩
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.26, pp.53-71, 2003-03-20 (Released:2018-04-25)
参考文献数
23

This paper examines J. G. A.Pocock's interpretation of Edmund Burke. Pocock's interpretation of Burke is well known among scholars of Burke's thought, but its relevance to other interpretations of Burke is not so clear. I make it clear that Pocock's interpretation can be read as a counterargument to the Namier school, who regarded Burke as an opportunist. This type of the interpretation propounded by the Namier school was virtually denied by the Natural Law Interpretation of Burke, which was offered by the American political philosophers under the influence of Leo Strauss. Pocock's interpretation is an counterargument not only to the Namier school but also to the Natural Law Interpretation. Through this examination, I suggest some implications of Pocock's interpretation in helping to appreciate the pragmatic aspects of Burk's thought.

2 0 0 0 OA 政治哲学

著者
大澤 津 蛭田 圭
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.41, pp.93-104, 2018-03-20 (Released:2021-04-16)
参考文献数
81
著者
梅澤 佑介
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.39, pp.35-49, 2016-03-20 (Released:2018-03-30)
参考文献数
25

Harold Laski, well-known as an advocate of the pluralistic theory of the state, presented his theory as the antithesis of T. H. Green's idealism. Nevertheless, Laski inherited Green's idea of 'rebellion as the duty of citizens'. Green's influence on Laski has rarely been the focus of attention in Laski studies because the central role the idea of positive duty of rebellion plays in his thought has been neglected. By examining the relationship between Laski's acceptance and critique of Green, this paper shows that Laski's pluralistic theory was developed as an effort to revive Green's theory of resistance.
著者
古田 拓也
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.37, pp.77-91, 2014-03-20 (Released:2018-03-30)
参考文献数
34

The aim of this paper is to present John Lockeʼs arguments in the Two Treatises of Government as a comprehensive response to Robert Filmerʼs vehement criticism of the contract theory. Filmer argues that contract theory neither works in theory nor in practice, and so is, as such, a theory of anarchy. Partly accepting these criticisms, Locke constructs a contract theory such that Filmerʼs attacks lose their theoretical sting, that is, an individualistic contract theory which rejects the stigmatization of anarchy. However, Lockeʼs reconstruction is based on the theological foundations which we cannot reasonably share today. Acknowledgement of this fact, in turn, enables us to appreciate the contemporary significance of both Locke and Filmer.
著者
高橋 和則
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, pp.37-52, 2012-03-20 (Released:2018-03-30)
参考文献数
26

Edmund Burke seems to be a thinker who was one of critics to the modern social contract theory. But he had the idea of social contract. I think he did not deny the theory of social contract itself. This paper aims to reconstruct his theory from some writings and speeches. To do it, it is necessary to articulate the relation of civil society and civilized society in his thought, and to make clear how he understood the natural state. It seems to me that these arguments show the natures and conditions of modern government in his thought.
著者
戒能 通弘
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.35, pp.5-19, 2012-03-20 (Released:2018-03-30)
参考文献数
31

This paper focuses on the development of the English concept of the ʻrule of lawʼ, analysing Edward Coke, Matthew Hale and William Blackstoneʼs works. I will demonstrate the diversity of this concept, as against the prerogative. On the other hand, the rule of law concept has been almost consistently under the sway of parliamentary sovereignty. The history of the English rule of law concept is one of formalisation. Cokeʼs restraint of the prerogative by ʻreasonʼ was replaced by Haleʼs restraint by ʻknown lawʼ. The English rule of law did not intervene where the legislatures acted in formally correct ways.
著者
瀧田 寧
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.30, pp.65-78, 2007-03-20 (Released:2018-03-30)

The similarity between Locke and contemporary French thinkers is that both assert that the realm in which reason should play an active role must be distinguished from that in which things can be considered as a matter of faith. The difference between them, on the other hand, lies in their views on the traditional revelation based on the authority of the church: Locke considers the revelation to be a matter of reason because it relies only on the words that lead to the probable interpretation, while the French thinkers treat it as a matter of faith because they believe the authority to be entirely decisive. Thus, this paper is an attempt to reveal the significance of Locke's matter of reason as contradistinguished from his matter of faith.
著者
石原 正博
出版者
日本イギリス哲学会
雑誌
イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.22, pp.69-81, 1999-03-27 (Released:2018-04-25)

Harriet Taylor and J. S. Mill, in the late 1840's and early 1850's, just before and after their marriage, wrote a series of articles on injustice and cruelty, revealing their growing concern over the effects of male violence and authority sanctioned by law. Their intention was to drive legislators and judges to regard violence as a serious crime deserving severe punishment. My analytical approaches are based upon thoughts in their “joint productions”; sometimes Mill comments, “Very little of this article was mine”. This paper aims to shed light on Harriet Taylor's ideas and the formative process of Mill's thoughts.