著者
玉井 颯一 五十嵐 祐
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
2019

<p>Ostracism is a contradicted social action because it has been widely adopted as a legal sanction but is also considered to be excessive enforcement. In the present study, we conducted a scenario-based experiment to examine the psychological process underlying the endorsement of ostracism in school settings. We focused on three general rationales to justify the sanction: a general prevention to protect public welfare (utilitarianism); a counter to deviance from social norms (retributivism); and a type of education to rehabilitate a perpetrator (moral education). The results showed that utilitarianism was more effective in justifying ostracism than retributivism or moral education. Further, preferences towards ostracism based in utilitarianism were less susceptible to influence from others. These findings indicate people's general preference for the protection of public welfare over the segregation of wrongdoers.</p>
著者
白木 優馬 五十嵐 祐 SHIRAKI Yuma IGARASHI Tasuku
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.62, pp.97-106, 2015-12-28

The development of Information Technology has unraveled a new form of employment, crowdsourcing. With the spread of crowdsourcing, psychological researchers began collecting data with crowdsourcing. Crowdsourcing enables them to collect data from a wider range of people in a shorter timespan relative to the conventional methods. Although the application of crowdsourcing has gained popularity in foreign psychological research in recent times, Japanese researchers have not yet tapped this resource. Therefore, this paper presents the available framework of crowdsourcing service for Japanese researchers and its usage aiming for the spread of crowdsourcing in Japanese psychological research. Furthermore, we underline the required precautionary measures while collecting data using crowdsourcing.
著者
白木 優馬 五十嵐 祐
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.87, no.5, pp.474-484, 2016
被引用文献数
3

<p>We examined two psychological processes of prosocial behavior: feeling gratitude and indebtedness. First, we asked if the value of the behavior for the receiver promotes gratitude; and second if the cost of the behavior for the giver promotes indebtedness. Gratitude and indebtedness were measured as behavioral indices of a <i>quid pro quo</i> (indirect reciprocity and direct reciprocity) to avoid social desirability effects in self-report measures. In Study 1, 119 undergraduates recalled a past experience in which they had been the recipients of prosocial behavior while emphasizing the value, cost, or situation (control) of the event. The level of gratitude was higher, and indirect reciprocity was observed more frequently, in the value condition than in the cost and control conditions. Indebtedness, however, did not differ across the conditions. In Study 2, 59 participants received a gift (the value and cost of which were manipulated) from an imaginary confederate. The value manipulation promoted indirect reciprocity, and both value and cost manipulations encouraged direct reciprocity. Implications for adaptive functions of gratitude in social selection processes are discussed.</p>
著者
樽井 この美 五十嵐 祐 タルイ コノミ イガラシ タスク Tarui Konomi Igarashi Tasuku
出版者
大阪大学大学院人間科学研究科対人社会心理学研究室
雑誌
対人社会心理学研究 = Japanese journal of interpersonal and social psychology (ISSN:13462857)
巻号頁・発行日
no.16, pp.33-39, 2016-03

本研究は、集団討議場面において集団成員が問題解決に寄与する言動をしないことを沈黙として捉え、集団内での沈黙を抑制する要因について検討した。集団内の圧力への屈服、ネガティブなフィードバックへの恐れ、現状維持といった沈黙の要因は、制御焦点(Higgins,1997)のうち予防焦点と関連すると考えられることから、本研究では、集団討議場面において、予防焦点の優勢な個人の発言時間が促進焦点の優勢な個人よりも短くなると予測し、隠れたプロフィール課題を用いて3名集団での集団討議実験を行った。分析の結果、制御焦点の操作によって発言時間に有意な差はみられなかった。その一方で、促進焦点が優勢となっている場合、特性的な予防焦点が発言と関連しており、特性的予防焦点と、促進焦点のプライミングの交互作用が発言に影響する可能性が示唆された。This study investigated psychological factors that decrease in-group silence.Silence is regarded as behaving passively or doing nothing to influence group decision making in a group,and lead by in-group pressure,threats of getting negative feedback,and status quo. Based on the regulatory focus theory,this study used a hidden profile task in a group with three members and predicted that a minority member in the group primed with prevention focus is likely to speak shorter than those with promotion focus. Results showed that no significant differences were found between promotion focus and prevention focus priming.On the other hand,trait prevention focus of the minorities increased an illocutionally act in the promotion-focused condition.Implication of the result interpreted by the impact of activated motivation on the avoidance of criticism for passive involvements in group tasks among people with chronic prevention focus.
著者
佐藤 有紀 五十嵐 祐 吉田 俊和 SATO Yuki IGARASHI Tasuku YOSHIDA Toshikazu
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.60, pp.39-47, 2013-12-27 (Released:2014-03-06)

Today, most Japanese corporations implement a merit pay or pay-for-performance system in order to enhance job performance. This study investigated the effect of pay-for-performance system on employees’ preference for organizational citizenship behavior using the hypothetical Prisoner’s Dilemma. Based on regulatory focus theory (Higgins, 1997), we focused on reward expectation for performance (e.g., promotion) and performance pressure (e.g., fears of failure), both of which presumably affect employees’ approach motivation in a different way. We hypothesized that employees’ reward expectation for performance increases their preference for organizational citizenship behavior while performance pressure decreases it. Three hundred and nineteen Japanese employees completed a take-home questionnaire; however, we only examined 175 of those (126 men and 49 women) who were working under management by objectives. Logistic regression analysis confirmed our hypotheses, suggesting that under pressure employees prioritize their individualized objectives rather than cooperate with others for a common goal. Expectation for reward increased employees’ preference for cooperative behavior when a situation calls for dealing with a coworker’s favor. Furthermore, these results were seen only for employees under pay-for-performance system such that those under the traditional system showed the reverse trend. Future studies should examine situational factors as well as each employee’s approach motivation.
著者
浅野 良輔 五十嵐 祐 塚本 早織
出版者
公益社団法人 日本心理学会
雑誌
心理学研究 (ISSN:00215236)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.85, no.1, pp.69-79, 2014
被引用文献数
16

Hedonia (seeking pleasure and relaxation) and eudaimonia (seeking to improve oneself in congruence with one's values) uniquely contribute to well-being. The authors developed and tested the construct validity of a Japanese version of the Hedonic and Eudaimonic Motives for Activities (HEMA) scale that had been originally developed in North America. Drawing on the theoretical and empirical evidence from research on emotion, we proposed that people would pursue well-being in three different directions: pleasure, relaxation, and eudaimonia. In Study 1, we used the original HEMA scale to examine the Japanese attainment of well-being. The results supported the hypothesized three-factor model. Study 2 revealed that the Japanese version of the HEMA scale measured pleasure, relaxation, and eudaimonia. Each of these subscales showed statistically sufficient internal consistency. There was no gender difference in any of these measures. Scores on the scale systematically corresponded with external criterion variables, such as life satisfaction, affect, Ryff's psychological well-being, social support, and lifestyle. Implications for psychological research and public policies that cover the topic of the pursuit of well-being are discussed.
著者
五十嵐 祐
出版者
日本社会心理学会
雑誌
社会心理学研究 (ISSN:09161503)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.17, no.2, pp.97-108, 2002

The use of computer-mediated communication (CMC) technology has increased in society, and CMC is useful in making interpersonal relationships. This study investigated the effect of social skills on loneliness, based on the social network mediation model and the cognitive bias model (Levin & Stokes, 1986). The social network mediation model suggests that social skills affect loneliness through mediation by social network variables of both face-to-face (FTF) communication and CMC. The cognitive bias model states that social skills directly affect loneliness through cognitive processes. Two-hundred eleven college students (study 1) and 164 participants recruited through the Internet (study 2) completed self-report measures of loneliness and social skills in addition to instruments assessing their social networks on FTF and CMC. The results were as follows : (a) the effect of social skills on loneliness was mediated by the social network variables of FTF ; (b) CMC variables were affected by social skills, but had only weak effects on loneliness ; c social skills directly affected loneliness. The lack of nonverbal cues in CMC was discussed as a possible explanation for the weak effects of social network variables of CMC on loneliness.