著者
上地 香杜 加藤 一晃 野村 駿 太田 知彩 内田 良 KAMIJI Koto KATO Kazuaki NOMURA Hayao OTA Kazusa UCHIDA Ryo
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.65, no.2, pp.97-107, 2019-03-31

The purpose of this paper is to clarify how the existence of family for a teacher affects the way he/ she works, revealing gender differences. Recently in Japan a “work style reform” has been suggested in the hopes of alleviating overly long working hours as well as to better appreciate the diversity of working styles. This movement also includes adopting a more open attitude toward balancing childcare, nursing care, and career, so the reform also includes a focus on the family members of workers. This reform talk has encouraged active discussion about teachers’ work styles. However, where previous research has clarified the situation of long working hours and the resultant mental health of teachers, there are few studies focusing on diversity among teachers. In particular, there are few studies that focus on gender differences or on differences in family relationships among teachers. This paper, which focuses on gender differences in teaching takes into consideration the family style of teachers and the effect it has on the actual condition of teachers’ working styles. The following three has been clarified. (1) Working time commitment is shorter when a teacher has their own children. In addition, working hours tend to be shorter for female teachers. (2) Wheras women teachers express they feel busier when they have their own children, this tendency was not seen among male teachers with children. (3) Analyzing work hours and busyness, in general, teachers with children feel busier than teachers without children, with female teachers feeling four times busier than male teachers. This paper suggests a necessity to discuss the existence of teachers’ families when discussing the “work style reform” that will affect them.
著者
野村 駿 太田 知彩 上地 香杜 加藤 一晃 内田 良 NOMURA Hayao OTA Kazusa KAMIJI Koto KATO Kazuaki UCHIDA Ryo
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.65, no.2, pp.109-121, 2019-03-31

This paper uses the viewpoint of a teacher’s past experience to reveal the mechanism that relates to a teacher’s subjective feelings when coaching extracurricular club activities. Currently in Japan, there is much discussion of work-type reforms regarding the way teachers work in public and at academic levels. Various investigations show the situation of teachers in contemporary Japanese society as one of excessive overwork. In particular, for junior high school teachers, the temporal and psychological burden of monitoring club activities has been regarded as a problem. Although previous studies have pointed out problems due to extracurricular club activities, the problem of a teacher’s subjective feelings – over-reacting, acting out, or passionately involved – has not been sufficiently studied. Therefore, in this paper, we examine the mechanism by which teachers experience subjectively the coaching of extracurricular club activities. The results of this paper are as follows. Firstly, the temporal burden of coaching of extracurricular club activities falls hard on younger teachers. However, in all tasks, including club activities, young teachers express a desire for increased work, making it appear s though they were inviting themselves to be busier. Secondly, from the viewpoint of subjective enjoyment experienced from recalled participation their own junior high school and high school club activities, young teachers who found enjoyment from participating in current school club activities were those who had evaluated their own past club experiences positively, so tended to contribute a longer time to overseeing these activities as teachers. However, those teachers who recall their past club activities as not having been so enjoyable do not find the current participation in club activities as teachers so positively. Yet due that fact that they are young teachers, they are forced to instruct a club activity for a long time. Thirdly, there are many young teachers who have been involved in the same club activities consistently from their own junior high school years up through the present time; they derive pleasure from coaching the club activities so their time commitment for coaching is longer. At the same time among young teachers, there are many who do not enjoy being in charge of club activities they have themselves not experienced previously and dislike being forced to commit a long time for such guidance. In this paper, we have analyzed the issue of teachers’ subjective feelings regarding responsibilities toward club activities and point out the necessity to set up opportunities during the pre-service teacher training stage for each pre-service teacher to express his/her own experience of past club activities.
著者
渡邉 雅子 WATANABE Masako Ema
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.58, no.2, pp.1-13, 2011

Using a structural comparison of the dissertation and the essay (French and American academic writing), this paper attempts to clarify the differences in thought and written expression of these writing structures in the two countries, examining the societal and cultural background that has influenced both styles of writing. In contrast to the dissertation, which has a dialectical three-stage structure of thesis-antithesissynthesis, the essay focuses on the thesis, the author's claims, and supporting evidence. The essay in its simplified structure is likened to the "arrow shot at the target" in a straight line, whereas the dissertation is more of a "bird's eye view" depicting the largest possible structural outline for the theme and the integrating of opposing viewpoints. The two styles clearly have contrasting features, for the essay places importance on creating a firm link between the claim and the grounds, while the dissertation accepts the complexity of the theme and attempts mostly to describe the full picture. The elimination of the antithesis and synthesis from American academic writing is relatively recent, tracing back to the 1960s, when American higher education became rapidly popularized. It was created from the necessity to have a form of academic wiring that could be easily written by students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The American style of essay is designed to work well in a popular democracy. By contrast, the dissertation was introduced at the end of the 19th century as a symbol of the new society and education after the French Revolution. With the arrival of the dissertation, it can be said that the traditional education of France in the classical languages and rhetoric was transformed into a discipline that makes use of dialectics to build up a robust form of personal thought. However, the intellectual tradition descended from Greek and Roman thought remains in the dialectical structure of the dissertation and in the common culture of French literature and philosophy. The French dissertation presupposes that the educated are the successors of the ancients, their raison d'étre based on a cultural superiority inherent in the classics, the knowledge of which inspires a method of thinking that necessitates a comprehensive viewpoint integrating opposing views. The dissertation, then, is the written embodiment of this pedagogical, philosophical perspective. I suggest that this way of thinking could offer a counterpoint to globalism, which imposes a uniform set of rules and viewpoints on everyone.
著者
加藤 一晃 野村 駿 太田 知彩 上地 香杜 内田 良 KATO Kazuaki NOMURA Hayao OTA Kazusa KAMIJI Koto UCHIDA Ryo
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.66, no.2, pp.199-209, 2020-03-31

From 1960’s, sports activities, such as Junior Sport Clubs Association and private sports club for elementary school age has been expanded. The purpose of this paper was to clarify the impact on junior high school extra-curricular club activities caused by the expansion of sports activities among elementary school age. Through analyzing the data acquired from questionnaire survey for junior high school teachers, we got the following results. 1. When looking at the athletic club as a whole, the clubs with few experienced students account for about 30 to 40%. However, there are about 20% of the clubs where almost all of them are made up of experienced students. And the clubs consisted by more experienced students practice more frequently and the participation frequency of practice games tend to be overheated. 2. The number of experienced people depends on the kind of sports, and there are many experienced students especially in baseball and soccer. There are few experienced players in badminton, tennis, “track and fields” and table tennis. The sports in which the more experienced students participate is likely to practice more frequently. From this result, it can be inferred that the expansion of sports opportunities at the elementary school level has increased the number of people already skilled at the time of entering junior high school, which has led to overheating. 3. However, even in the kind of sports with few experienced people, some clubs have many experienced students. As long as there are a lot of experienced people, there is a tendency to participate in high-level competitions. However, only in the case of baseball and soccer, practice time and practice game frequency correlate with the percentage of experienced players. In other kind of sports, there is no correlation between the number of experienced students and the time of activity or practice game frequency. For baseball and soccer, it is more common to experience in elementary school and then continue it in the junior high school sports club. This may have increased the impact of elementary school level experience not only on competition results but also on practice time or practice game frequency. Based on the above results, the importance of focusing on the continuity of sports from elementary school level to junior high school level was discussed.
著者
渡邉 雅子 WATANABE Masako Ema
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.58, no.2, pp.1-13, 2012-03

Using a structural comparison of the dissertation and the essay (French and American academic writing), this paper attempts to clarify the differences in thought and written expression of these writing structures in the two countries, examining the societal and cultural background that has influenced both styles of writing. In contrast to the dissertation, which has a dialectical three-stage structure of thesis-antithesissynthesis, the essay focuses on the thesis, the author's claims, and supporting evidence. The essay in its simplified structure is likened to the "arrow shot at the target" in a straight line, whereas the dissertation is more of a "bird's eye view" depicting the largest possible structural outline for the theme and the integrating of opposing viewpoints. The two styles clearly have contrasting features, for the essay places importance on creating a firm link between the claim and the grounds, while the dissertation accepts the complexity of the theme and attempts mostly to describe the full picture. The elimination of the antithesis and synthesis from American academic writing is relatively recent, tracing back to the 1960s, when American higher education became rapidly popularized. It was created from the necessity to have a form of academic wiring that could be easily written by students from diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The American style of essay is designed to work well in a popular democracy. By contrast, the dissertation was introduced at the end of the 19th century as a symbol of the new society and education after the French Revolution. With the arrival of the dissertation, it can be said that the traditional education of France in the classical languages and rhetoric was transformed into a discipline that makes use of dialectics to build up a robust form of personal thought. However, the intellectual tradition descended from Greek and Roman thought remains in the dialectical structure of the dissertation and in the common culture of French literature and philosophy. The French dissertation presupposes that the educated are the successors of the ancients, their raison d'étre based on a cultural superiority inherent in the classics, the knowledge of which inspires a method of thinking that necessitates a comprehensive viewpoint integrating opposing views. The dissertation, then, is the written embodiment of this pedagogical, philosophical perspective. I suggest that this way of thinking could offer a counterpoint to globalism, which imposes a uniform set of rules and viewpoints on everyone.
著者
藤江 里衣子
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要 心理発達科学 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.56, pp.29-38, 2009

There is such experience as feeling incompetent in spite of one's outstanding accomplishments. Clance and Imes focused on this experience, and proposed a new concept "impostor phenomenon". In this study, researches on the impostor phenomenon were overviewed from the viewpoint of characteristics of the phenomenon, the trends of research before the proposal on it, its background, the relevant variables, and the measurement scales. As a result, it was revealed that there was ambiguity in the definition of the impostor phenomenon, in the significance of proposing this concept, and in the reality of it. In the future research, it is necessary to define the impostor phenomenon and to reveal the reality of it. Moreover, on the assumption that the impostor phenomenon as a state, its generation mechanism model was showed.
著者
太田 知彩 上地 香杜 加藤 一晃 野村 駿 内田 良 OTA Kazusa KAMIJI Koto KATO Kazuaki NOMURA Hayao UCHIDA Ryo
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.66, no.2, pp.211-219, 2020-03-31

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the actual situation of club activities in junior high school and teachers’ awareness of them by focusing on school size. Recently in Japan, there are a lot of discussions about work-type reforms regarding the way teachers work in public and academic levels because many surveys showed that the working hours of teachers in japan have been too long. And club activities have been pointed out as the cause of overworking, however, there have been few studies of the working hours of teachers and actual situations of club activities by focusing on school size. Therefore, in this paper, we examine the actual situation of club activities and how the teachers think about them by focusing the class size which means the number of students. The results of this paper are as follows. First, there are differences regarding working hours and hours of club activities depending on school size, which suggests that teachers who work at larger schools work much longer. Secondly, the larger schools offer more types of club activities yet less rest days from club activities during holidays. And the ratio of teachers who teach club activities is equal but teachers who work at smaller school coach alone. Finally, teachers who work at larger schools tend to prefer to coach club activities much longer than teachers who work at smaller schools. Regarding this, we suggested that teachers who work at larger schools have more chances to coach club activities for which they have had experience through their own junior high school years; also, they are able to coach prefered activities as there is a larger number of activities to choose from in a larger school. Based on the above, this paper suggests that the school size and the number of club activities play an important role in securing a workload more acceptable for teachers and their duties with club activities.
著者
緒川 和代 OGAWA Kazuyo
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.61, pp.123-136, 2014-12-26 (Released:2015-03-04)

This paper reviews 50 case studies of dissociative disorders in Japanese children and examines the feature from the standpoints of “age of initial diagnosis”, “gender”, “diagnosis”, “family background”, “life episode”, “symptoms”, “type of therapist”, “therapy style, technique and theory used”, “length of treatment”, and “convalescence”. Results clarified that, before reaching the age of 15, few children of dissociative disorders seek medical consultation despite showing signs of illness. Also it is possible that “an abusive growing environment”, “parents with hands-off policy or over-protective child-rearing attitude”, “a good boy/girl personality”, and “traumatic episodes such as being bullied or sexually abused” are some of the indicators used in identifying child dissociative disorders. The paper concludes that dissociative disorders among Japanese children should be identified earlier in life by assessing his/her growing environment, parents’ child-rearing attitude, personalities, and traumatic episodes, and professional personnel should refer these children to appropriate medical treatment as soon as possible.
著者
中元 崇 NAKAMOTO Takashi
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.66, no.2, pp.109-125, 2020-03-31

The purpose of this study is to clarify what factors affect both the intentions and obstructions experienced for university staff members considering going to graduate school. In recent years with the advancement and specialization of jobs at higher education institutions, several graduate courses for university staff have been established. However, while some staff go to graduate school, the majority do not. This paper aim to explore the causes for this difference. A secondary analysis using the data from the “National University Administrative Staff Survey” was performed. The study found significant differences among several factors (age, presence / absence of knowledge to be learned, intention to take other learning opportunities, fields of interest, etc.) between those who had the intention to go to graduate school and those who did not. Similarly, there were significant differences among several factors that related to the work environment between those who felt obstructed to go to graduate school and those who did not. An analysis was performed to discern whether the intention of going to graduate school had relation with individual’s perceived obstructive factors, yet no significant difference was related to individual intention. These results suggest the necessity to explore various measures more thoroughly such as methods to promote learning from an early stage, to communicate with employees to give them clear indication for career path, and to improve the work environment.
著者
張 林倩 ZHANG Linqian
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.65, no.1, pp.51-63, 2018-10-01

Neoliberalism has gained status as a dominant manner of discourse since the 1970’s, yet its concepts remain vague and difficult to evaluate. Foucault’s Theory of Governmentality offers a theoretical framework from which to critically evaluate neoliberalism. This paper attempts to reconsider neoliberalism critically using Foucault’s Theory of Governmentality. First, I review the history of neoliberalism and describe its characteristics. Neoliberalism, first created in Germany and the United States in 1930’s, was not the regression of Classical liberalism; rather it was attempt to demarcate the possibility and limitation of government intervention. Next, utilizing Foucault’s Theory of Governmentality, I reexamine neoliberalism critically. According to neoliberal governance, economic growth gives justification to the state when it experiences a crisis. When this occurs, the positions of economic power and legal power within a society are reversed. Thus, neoliberalism has the effect of breaking down the border between the social arena and the market; society becomes commercialized and market by homo-economics. This results is an internalization of the market principle, with society governing via investing in itself in order to manage risk, In this way, neoliberalism makes it possible to justify itself by reorganizing the legal system. Additionally, neoliberalism established a hegemony by producing a system of homo-economics with its neoliberal governing model.
著者
阿曽沼 明裕 ASONUMA Akihiro
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.67, no.1, pp.1-15, 2020-09-30

Functional differentiation of higher education institutions has long been discussed in Japan. Implicitly, it has been argued against a background of the problem of resource constraints. If there are resource restrictions, duplication of functions among various institutions is considered problematic. However, when discussing functional differentiation, the difference of financial bases among different institutions of higher education has been rarely examined in detail. We should consider how financial resources are distributed unevenly among higher education institutions. In this study we take the US higher education system as an example in order to better understand the relationship between the functional differentiation and financial basis of higher education institutions. The US higher education system is comprised of a great diversity of higher education institutions, differentiated further into various types of institutions. Fortunately, the “Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education” is very useful. Moreover, the IPEDS (Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System) provides the financial data that enables comparison of higher education institutions. In this article (part1) we examined where financial resources are unevenly distributed among various institutions of higher education. We focused on the difference between public, private, and forprofit institutions, and the difference of the institutional types as defined by the Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. One result found that more than 60% of the total income of institutions of higher education is concentrated on the “Doctoral Universities”, although the number of institutions is relatively small. This is due to the large scale of student numbers and the high cost per student for doctoral programs. Endowment assets are also concentrated in the “Doctoral Universities”, as well as in the private “Baccalaureate Colleges”. This uneven distribution of financial resources among institutions and the factors behind the uneven distribution are discussed.
著者
佐藤 暁子 金井 篤子 SATO Akiko KANAI Atsuko
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
no.64, pp.111-117, 2017-12-28

In recent years, studies on resilience have been increasing at home and abroad. One of the reasons of this increase is that resilience has attracted a lot of expectations because it is believed to enhance social adaptation. However, in the studies on resiliency so far, we have had no sole fixed definition for this concept of. In these studies, the term "resilience" was used in different ways, and the methods and the objects of these studies were different as well. Therefore, we have had a lot of confusion over this concept. In addition, the differences between the concept of resilience and the psychological stress model are not clear, either. In this paper, we will review how the resilience concept developed in studies of abroad. Also, we will cover the existing issues while providing the overview of the current status of resiliency studies in Japan.
著者
四辻 伸吾 YOTSUTSUJI Shingo
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.64, pp.99-109, 2017-12-28

News of bullying-related suicides being reported almost on a daily basis and it is a major problem in the field of education. Different bullying prevention programs have been developed and conducted in educational settings for preventing bullying. Programs including Olweus Bullying Prevention Program (OBPP; Olweus, 2007) and KiVa program, among others have been used internationally and have reported good results. These programs are currently being comprehensively utilized. On the other hand, development and conduct of bullying prevention programs in Japan are often left to individual schools, and nationwide systematic programs have not been developed to date. Moreover, in many cases, effects of bullying prevention programs have not been empirically verified. This study analyzed Japanese bullying prevention programs used in educational settings, from the following perspectives: (1) statistical verification of program efficacy, and (2) confirmation of consistency with curriculum guidelines. “confirmation of consistency with curriculum guidelines” means that the practice contents of the practiced bullying prevention program accorded with an aim and the contents such as each subject shown in curriculum guidelines. First, we searched the Internet for the keywords “bullying,” and “programs” in the Japanese literature, and identified 33 articles, which were reviewed. Among the 33 papers, statistical verification of program efficacy was conducted in 15 studies, all of which indicated that the programs were effective. Moreover, 19 papers described subjects and fields in which the programs were practiced. Among the 19 papers, only four described the consistency between practice and contents of subjects and fields. Previous studies might be insufficient in both statistical verification of program efficacy and examining the consistency between programs and learning contents. Therefore, further studies on this topic are required. Future perspectives of Japanese bullying prevention programs are discussed based on these results from following perspective. (1) Developing a program of annual curriculums composed of small plural learning units having statistically established efficacy for bullying prevention. (2) Developing a program that is specifically placed in curriculum guidelines, especially in “moral education,” “integrated studies,” and “special activities,” lessons, which are often used in bullying prevention programs. It is expected that programs for bullying prevention for wide use in Japanese educational settings could be developed based on these perspectives.
著者
加藤 一晃 KATO Kazuaki
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.67, no.1, pp.61-75, 2020-09-30

The aim of this paper is to illustrate the effect of quantitative changes that have occurred in the organization of the Japanese high school curriculum. It is well documented that the educational reforms of the 1980s brought greater diversification to the high school curriculum. Much research has focused on the qualitative changes to the curriculum without equal concentration on the impact of quantitative changes. This paper addresses this overlooked area of research. In the 1980's, The Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology created policies in order to reduce the amount high school students were expected to learn. The number of credits necessary to graduate high school was reduced, as were the standard number of class hours. Subsequently, from the 2000's, the Ministry of Education policies began to change direction, and an increase in the amount of learning expected was implemented. This research examines to what degree the amount of learning content was affected by these policies. This paper analyzes the Curriculum Organization Survey, conducted by the Ministry of Education, as well as the influence of the international academic assessment test, PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) conducted by the OECD. The following findings were secured:1. The amount of learning content expected in the 2000's decreased further than what it had been in the 1980's.2. In the 2000's, the amount of learning content imposed during weekdays increased. 3. From 2003, class hours increased overall.4. From the 2000s, non-vocational high schools, whether prestigious schools or not, increased their class hours.In conclusion, class hours for high school students have expanded for a diversity of high schools. Further investigation into the effect that the expansion of class hours has on the overall curriculum of high school is suggested.
著者
青木 直子 AOKI Naoko
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 心理発達科学 (ISSN:13461729)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.52, pp.123-133, 2005-12-27

This article reviews studies on the concept ”praise”. Many studies have been conducted on praise in the field of psychology. These studies addressed the function of praise, its effect on motivation and emotion, its use in counseling and in the local community, guides to better praise, and the caution that must be exercised with regard to praise. Most of these studies have focused on the effect of praise and have been conducted from the perspective of the teachers and parents who praise children. However, there are few studies on children’s cognition of praise. Praise is communication; therefore, it needs to be researched from the viewpoint of both adults who praise children and children who are praised. This article highlights the need fro research from the viewpoint of children, particularly young, who are praised.
著者
山下 大喜 YAMASHITA Daiki
出版者
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科
雑誌
名古屋大学大学院教育発達科学研究科紀要. 教育科学 (ISSN:13460307)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.67, no.1, pp.37-45, 2020-09-30

Hu Shih (1891-1962) is well-known as the key founder of literature reform (文學革命) in modern China. One of his papers "Wenxue gailiang chuyi(文學改良芻議)" played an important role at the onset of literature reform, in which he proposed the adoption of vernacular Chinese as the language of new literature. His view on the form and substance of literature was exposed to bitter criticism from the Chinese Marxists. Because of the class struggles in the mid of 1950s, his theory was overly regarded as an idealism approach in opposition to materialism. This paper analyzes Hu Shih's statements concerning the form and substance of Chinese literature. The analysis of this paper reveals that Hu Shih fixed the order of priority for reforming Chinese literature from form to substance. He gave priority to the richer substance for new literature as he believed that the rich substance of new literature could only be expressed after the problems surrounding the rigid forms of Chinese literature were removed.研究は科研費(特別研究員奨励費)の助成を受けたものである。