著者

河合 望

出版者

早稲田大学

雑誌

基盤研究(B)

巻号頁・発行日

2008

---

本研究は、古代エジプト新王国時代の王墓の副葬品を総合的に研究し、葬制の一端を明らかにすることを目的とした。中でも早稲田大学が1991年より調査を継続している王家の谷・西谷のアメンヘテプ3世王墓出土の副葬品の研究を中心にエジプトおよび欧米の博物館・美術館で調査研究を実施した。また自らが発掘調査を手がけたラメセス2世の孫娘イシスネフェルトの墓出土の副葬品の研究等も実施した。これらの研究により、新王国時代の王および王の埋葬にかんする理解を深めることができた。

著者

河合 望

出版者

一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.51, no.2, pp.27-56, 2009-03-31 (Released:2014-03-30)

---

Scholars have discussed the individual roles of Ay and Horemheb, who were the most influential persons during Tutankhamun’s reign and its aftermath, as well as the relationship between them for ages. Did they work together cooperatively or did some form of competition or hostility exist between them? This article examines the interaction between Ay and Horemheb and their attitudes towards one another through a review of all the available evidence. The first part focuses on their relationship under Tutankhamun and the second with their interactions following Tutankhamun’s death. I demonstrate that they were the most prominent figures in different social groups, suggesting that Ay was the fatherly advisor of the king at the court, while Horemheb was the actual governor of all the administration in the country as the “Regent” and “Generalissimo” under Tutankhamun. By the end of Tutankhamun’s reign, however, Ay seems to have obtained the title “Vizier” and the epithets “doer of maat” and “the one who unites the hands of the god,” representing that he is now capable of governing the country. Ay was indeed on the verge of becoming the successor of Tutankhamun. Therefore, I do not agree with the recent suggestion that Horemheb was the designate successor of Tutankhamun while he was the regent of Tutankhamun. In the second part, I argue that there was strong antagonism between Ay and Horemheb after Tutankhamun’s death. The evidence indicates that Horemheb sought to discredit Ay as proper successor to the king. As a result, Ay appears to have excluded Horemheb from greater courtly influence by appointing Nakhtmin not only as his “Generalissimo” but also as “King’s son.” This squabbling even continued after Ay’s death as Horemheb, once ascended to the throne, soon endeavored to erase all memory of Ay, his men and even Queen Ankhesenamun in revenge.

著者

柴田 大輔 河合 望 中町 信孝 津本 英利 長谷川 修一 青木 健 有松 唯 上野 雅由樹 久米 正吾 嶋田 英晴 下釜 和也 鈴木 恵美 高井 啓介 伊達 聖伸 辻 明日香 亀谷 学 渡井 葉子

出版者

筑波大学

雑誌

新学術領域研究(研究領域提案型)

巻号頁・発行日

2012-06-28

---

現在の西アジア諸国において戦争・政争を引き起こす重要なファクターとしてイスラームの政教問題が挙げられる。西アジア政教問題の重要性は万人が認めるところだが、一方でこの問題は単なる現代情勢の一端として表層的に扱われ、しかも紋切り型の説明で片付けられることも多い。本研究は、文明が発祥した古代からイスラーム政権が欧米列強と対峙する近現代にいたる長い歴史を射程に入れ、政教問題がたどった錯綜した系譜の解明を目指した。ユダヤ・キリスト教社会、紋切り型の説明を作ってきた近現代西欧のオリエント学者たちが西アジアに向けた「眼差し」も批判的に検討したうえで、西アジア政教問題に関する新しい見取り図の提示を目指した。

著者

河合 望

出版者

一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, no.1, pp.19-39, 2003

---

In the <i>Topographical Bibiliography</i> by Porter and Moss, the tomb of Ramose (TT 46) is listed as probably belonging to &ldquo;the time of Amenhotep III (?)&rdquo;. This tomb was first recorded by John Gardner Wilkinson in the 19^th Century. On the basis of Wilkinson's manuscript, Helck gave some of Ramose's titles in <i>Urkunden</i> IV. Graefe later published a brief communication concerning Ramose's titles based on this limited information. In 1991 Bohleke assumed that Ramose's career and tomb should date to the reigns of Tutankhamun, Ay, and perhaps, the first year of Horemheb. Most recently, Kampp discussed tomb 46, mainly focusing on architecture. She dates TT 46 to the reigns of Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV, with Ramose as the usurper of a tomb originally constructed for someone from the end of the Seventeenth Dynasty to the beginning of the Eighteenth Dynasty.<br>As a part of my study on the reign of Tutankhamun, I had the opportunity to visit the tombs of officials active during the reigns of Tutankhamun and his successors from the late Eighteenth Dynasty in the Theban Necropolis. A certain Ramose who has the title of Overseer of Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt is mentioned in the year 3 stela of King Ay from Giza. Since Ramose, the owner of TT 46, also has the title of Overseer of Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt, the tomb and the stela seem to refer to the same person, and thus the generally accepted date of Ramose's tomb seems to be questionable. During my study of TT 46, it became clear that this is a tomb from the post-Amarna period for the following reasons: 1. Ramose held the titles of the Steward of the temple of Aten as well as the High Priest of Amun in <i>Mn-st</i> at the same time. The names of Amun were not expunged at all but those of Aten were clearly chiseled out on the tomb walls. This strongly indicates the tomb was decorated after the Amarna period. 2. The artistic style also suggests that the tomb was decorated in the post-Amarna period. 3. A headless block statue of Ramose, Overseer of Double Granaries, may support this date. 4. Since it is known that Khaemhat was the Overseer of Granaries during the later part of the reign of Amenhotep III, Ramose could not have served as the Overseer of Double Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt at that period.<br>Therefore, it is likely that Ramose served in the post-Amarna period, most probably under Tutankhamun as well as Ay, as the Overseer of Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt, Steward of the Temple of the Aten, and High Priest of Amun in <i>Mn-st</i>. If so, his titulary provides the first Theban evidence that the temple of Aten was still functioning even after the Amarna period, supplementing the contemporary evidence from the Memphite necropolis.

著者

河合 望

出版者

一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会

雑誌

オリエント (ISSN:00305219)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, no.1, pp.19-39, 2003-09-30 (Released:2010-03-12)

---

In the Topographical Bibiliography by Porter and Moss, the tomb of Ramose (TT 46) is listed as probably belonging to “the time of Amenhotep III (?)”. This tomb was first recorded by John Gardner Wilkinson in the 19th Century. On the basis of Wilkinson's manuscript, Helck gave some of Ramose's titles in Urkunden IV. Graefe later published a brief communication concerning Ramose's titles based on this limited information. In 1991 Bohleke assumed that Ramose's career and tomb should date to the reigns of Tutankhamun, Ay, and perhaps, the first year of Horemheb. Most recently, Kampp discussed tomb 46, mainly focusing on architecture. She dates TT 46 to the reigns of Amenhotep III and Amenhotep IV, with Ramose as the usurper of a tomb originally constructed for someone from the end of the Seventeenth Dynasty to the beginning of the Eighteenth Dynasty.As a part of my study on the reign of Tutankhamun, I had the opportunity to visit the tombs of officials active during the reigns of Tutankhamun and his successors from the late Eighteenth Dynasty in the Theban Necropolis. A certain Ramose who has the title of Overseer of Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt is mentioned in the year 3 stela of King Ay from Giza. Since Ramose, the owner of TT 46, also has the title of Overseer of Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt, the tomb and the stela seem to refer to the same person, and thus the generally accepted date of Ramose's tomb seems to be questionable. During my study of TT 46, it became clear that this is a tomb from the post-Amarna period for the following reasons: 1. Ramose held the titles of the Steward of the temple of Aten as well as the High Priest of Amun in Mn-st at the same time. The names of Amun were not expunged at all but those of Aten were clearly chiseled out on the tomb walls. This strongly indicates the tomb was decorated after the Amarna period. 2. The artistic style also suggests that the tomb was decorated in the post-Amarna period. 3. A headless block statue of Ramose, Overseer of Double Granaries, may support this date. 4. Since it is known that Khaemhat was the Overseer of Granaries during the later part of the reign of Amenhotep III, Ramose could not have served as the Overseer of Double Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt at that period.Therefore, it is likely that Ramose served in the post-Amarna period, most probably under Tutankhamun as well as Ay, as the Overseer of Granaries of Upper and Lower Egypt, Steward of the Temple of the Aten, and High Priest of Amun in Mn-st. If so, his titulary provides the first Theban evidence that the temple of Aten was still functioning even after the Amarna period, supplementing the contemporary evidence from the Memphite necropolis.

著者

近藤 二郎 河合 望 平原 信崇

出版者

早稲田大学會津八一記念博物館

雑誌

早稲田大学會津八一記念博物館研究紀要 (ISSN:13456369)

巻号頁・発行日

no.18, pp.15-23, 2016

著者

河合 望

出版者

雄山閣

雑誌

季刊考古学 (ISSN:02885956)

巻号頁・発行日

no.141, pp.83-86,9, 2017-11

著者

山田 嘉昭 佐伯 邦男 石原 康正 加藤 健三 春日 保男 河合 望 工藤 英明 小林 勝 佐賀 二郎 佐田 登志夫 神馬 敬 鈴木 弘 清野 次郎 高橋 浩 中島 浩衛 田中 英八郎 中村 虔一 平野 担 宮川 松男 柳本 左門 山田 嘉昭 佐伯 邦男 橋本 宥司

出版者

一般社団法人日本機械学会

雑誌

日本機械学會誌 (ISSN:00214728)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.73, no.614, pp.447-450, 1970-03-05

著者

河合 望 森 敏彦 丸茂 康男 千賀 雅明

出版者

一般社団法人日本機械学会

雑誌

日本機械学會論文集. C編 (ISSN:03875024)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.52, no.484, pp.3317-3323, 1986-12-25

---

For improving the deep-drawability of sheet metal, it is necessary to possibly heighten the fracture force of the metal on the punch shoulder. In the square shell deep-drawing, it is vital to uniformize the stress distribution along a circumferential direction at the punch shoulder, as mentioned in the previous papers. In this paper, to clarify the conditions of uniformizing the stress distribution, various lubricants are applied to the punch head, using the punches with various corner radii. In the case of the smaller corner radii, the better lubricants improve markedly the drawabiity ; but in the case of the cylindrical punch, the inferior lubricants do so only slightly. The mechanisms are explained through the measurement of metal flow and thickness strain on the punch head.