著者
澤海 崇文 望月 正哉 瀧澤 純 吉澤 英里
出版者
日本感情心理学会
雑誌
感情心理学研究 (ISSN:18828817)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.30, no.1, pp.1-10, 2023-05-15 (Released:2023-05-20)
参考文献数
33

In recent years, some forms of interpersonal communication labeled “ijiri” have played a significant role among the youth. This paper investigates what type of affective experience ijiri is perceived to cause compared with similar behaviors like teasing and bullying. We recruited 312 university students and asked them to answer questions about the possible affective experiences that arise in either of the agents (actor or receiver) in response to each type of behavior. The rating was done from the standpoint of either the actor, receiver, or third party. Results revealed that compared with the other two types of behavior, ijiri was perceived to cause lesser negative affective experiences. Affective experiences entailed by each type of behavior were influenced by the role of the respondent and that of the appraisal target. Future research is warranted to investigate the generalizability of the findings, given the limitations of self-reported measurements and conceptualization of affects.
著者
瀧澤 純 山下 利之
出版者
日本認知科学会
雑誌
認知科学 (ISSN:13417924)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.20, no.3, pp.343-352, 2013-09-01 (Released:2014-12-05)
参考文献数
15
被引用文献数
2

When people make inference about other’s mental state, they refer as an anchor to privileged information which they know and other doesn’t know, thereafter they make adjustment from the anchor to shared information which they know and other know. When adjustment are insufficiently, they use more privileged information, and have more egocentric biases. The purpose of the present study is to examine whether or not considering an anchor could affect strength of egocentric biases. Participants read a story about an e-mail sent from a person to another person and then the participants were asked to infer mental state of recipient. In Experiment 1, participants were asked to make a considering privileged information before making an inference. In Experi-ment 2, cognitive load were operated, participants made an inference under a condition prevented conscious cognitive process. These results showed that participants who con-sidered privileged information had more egocentric biases. These results are discussed cognitive processes controlling use of privileged information.
著者
望月 正哉 澤海 崇文 瀧澤 純 吉澤 英里 Mochizuki Masaya Yoshizawa Eri Takizawa Jun Sawaumi Takafumi ヨシザワ エリ サワウミ タカフミ モチズキ マサヤ タキザワ ジュン
出版者
大阪大学大学院 人間科学研究科 対人社会心理学研究室
雑誌
対人社会心理学研究 = Japanese journal of interpersonal and social psychology (ISSN:13462857)
巻号頁・発行日
no.17, pp.7-13, 2017-03

原著In recent years, some forms of interpersonal communication among the youth are labeled as "ijiri". The current paper investigates what characteristicsijiri is perceived to have, in comparison with similar types of behavior, teasing and bullying. We identified conceptual characteristics of each behavior in an open-ended preliminary survey. In a following study, we asked participants to rate to what degree each feature would characterize each of the three kinds of behavior while taking an observer's perspective. Results revealed that ijiri was perceived to be different from teasing and bullying based primarily on intention of the behavior: ijiri was perceived to carry more positive features such as the provider's and receiver's mutual intention to get closer to each other while less holding negative characteristics such as malicious and contemptuous attitudes toward the receiver.近年、若年者を中心とした対人コミュニケーションのなかでいじりという言葉が用いられる場面がある。本研究では、対人行動におけるいじりとはどのような特徴をもつ行動と認識されているのかについて、類似する行動と考えられるからかいやいじめとの比較を通じて検討した。初めに自由記述による予備調査を実施し、いじり、からかい、いじめがもつ概念的特徴を見出した。そのうえで、本調査では、第三者の立場から、いじり、からかい、いじめにおいて、それらの概念的特徴がどの程度あてはまるのかを評価させた。その結果、いじりは他の2つの行動に比べ、好意や互いが仲良くなりたいといった肯定的な特徴をもちつつ、悪意や受け手をバカにするといった否定的な特徴をもたないと評価されていた。このことから、いじり行動はからかいやいじめ行動と比較して、それぞれの意図性などをもとにして異なる特徴をもつと認識されていることが示された。
著者
瀧澤 純 山下 利之
出版者
Japanese Cognitive Science Society
雑誌
認知科学 = Cognitive studies : bulletin of the Japanese Cognitive Science Society (ISSN:13417924)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.20, no.3, pp.343-352, 2013-09-01

When people make inference about other's mental state, they refer as an anchor to<br> privileged information which they know and other doesn't know, thereafter they make<br> adjustment from the anchor to shared information which they know and other know.<br> When adjustment are insufficiently, they use more privileged information, and have<br> more egocentric biases. The purpose of the present study is to examine whether or not<br> considering an anchor could affect strength of egocentric biases. Participants read a<br> story about an e-mail sent from a person to another person and then the participants<br> were asked to infer mental state of recipient. In Experiment 1, participants were asked<br> to make a considering privileged information before making an inference. In Experi-<br>ment 2, cognitive load were operated, participants made an inference under a condition<br> prevented conscious cognitive process. These results showed that participants who con-<br>sidered privileged information had more egocentric biases. These results are discussed<br> cognitive processes controlling use of privileged information.