著者
高橋 洸治
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1972, no.26, pp.14-27, 1972 (Released:2009-09-04)
参考文献数
27

Formation was traditionally conceived under the relation of nature-environment based on a biological approach, in this paper an attempt is made to re-think this relation through an anthropological approach in the setting of a subject-object relation. First of all, the reason why the classic theory of formation is losing its applicability is found in the fact that the subject-object relation from the viewpoint of human nature has become distorted. Next, in order to overcome this subjectivism it is noted that it is necessary to exchange the subject-object relation for an existential relation of being, and to see formation as the result of an answer to the demand which springs from the existential relation. Finally, the schema-structure is discussed as an internal control which makes possible a self-formation within the existential relation, and its origin and function are examined. As a result, the conclusion is reached that the formative meaning of the schema-structure consists in a personal fulfilment reached through a functionalising of the various mental activities, entering thus into an existential relation and reaching thereby a unified content.
著者
高橋 勝
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1972, no.26, pp.44-59, 1972 (Released:2010-05-07)
参考文献数
56

The purpose of this paper is to consider, on the basis of several works about Max Scheler's Philosophische Anthropologic and Die Soziologie des Wissens published in 1920, under what characteristics in his theory modern “knowledge” is being analyzed and how this is being interpreted in view of “formation”. In his view modern “knowledge” is characterized by the fact that that the activity of man as homo faber acquiring knowledge is technical. That is, in modern times the subject of knowledge objectivates nature and faces as the content of “knowledge” the thing (Sache) as far as it thus has been limited. This kind of “knowledge” is called scientific “dominating knowledge” (Herrschaftswissen) and has the purpose of technically dominating nature. This, however, was originally only one side of “knowledge”.In Scheler's thought “knowledge” is divided into scientific “dominating knowledge” (Herrschaftswissen), “formative knowledge” (Bildungswissen) for the formation of man and “redemptive knoweldge” (Erlosungswissen) according to whether the knowing subject, by which the process of becoming (werden) is promoted, is a “thing” (Sache), “man” (Mensch) or “the absolute” (Das Absolute), Furthermore, it is understood that neither of these three types of knowledge can be substituted for one anothei.But as long as man continues to exist as a “person” he will be a being open toward an “intentional” (meaningful) “world” (Welt). He can realize himself in this without being bound by an “environmental world” (Umwelt), which appears as a relation of “things”. It is there that a more important meaning of “dominating knowledge” which
著者
高橋 洸治
出版者
教育哲学会
雑誌
教育哲学研究 (ISSN:03873153)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1970, no.22, pp.37-50, 1970-10-10 (Released:2009-09-04)
参考文献数
37

The essential character of the spirit consists in its objectivity. Thet is, spirit is determined by the definite character of a person and thing or a situation. However, this objectivity presupposes intentionality. It is when things become the object of our conscience and ear determined in concrete that they obtain the quality of existence by resisting intentionality. By determining the object we determine ourselves. Hence, self-determination promotes associating with the world. It is the subjective and individual conscience which governs the union with this world giving true peace of heart and leads toward an elevation of one's self. The original nature of this individual conscience is not the interference of an absolute judge or an external authority, but rather the insight into what is the better value for one's self. Thus the conscience as the heart of the intentional self, coordinates the self as a whole.
著者
山本 善次郎 坂本 堯 高橋 勝
出版者
日本医学哲学・倫理学会
雑誌
医学哲学 医学倫理 (ISSN:02896427)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.8, pp.25-34, 1990-07-31 (Released:2018-02-01)

A survey on terminal care was conducted in St. Marianna University School of Medicine in 1988. The results show: a) ST. Marianna staff members have a strong interest in terminal care; b) few of them consider religious support necessary for terminal patients; c) St. Marianna staff members recognize it's time to discuss hospice and hospice care earnestly. In our country, religious indifference is really quite persistent in this generation. Nevertheless, many terminal patients want religious support as well as psychochiatric support. With considerable experience of clinical pastoral care for terminal patients in the hospital, we are convinced that they need religious support.

1 0 0 0 OA 機械語

著者
高橋 秀俊
出版者
科学基礎論学会
雑誌
科学基礎論研究 (ISSN:00227668)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.7, no.3, pp.113-119, 1965-09-15 (Released:2009-09-04)
著者
高橋 優太
出版者
The Philosophy of Science Society, Japan
雑誌
科学哲学 (ISSN:02893428)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.49, no.1, pp.49-66, 2016-07-31 (Released:2016-11-10)
参考文献数
10

Gentzen remarked that one of the aims of his 1935/36 consistency proofs for first-order arithmetic was to give a “finitist” interpretation for the implication-formulas in first-order arithmetic. He imposed the following requirement on such an interpretation: a “finitist” interpretation for the implication-formulas must be able to avoid the circularity of implication that was urged by himself. However, Gentzen did not present his “finitist” interpretation explicitly. Moreover, he gave no argument for its non-circularity. In this paper, first we formulate an interpretation for the implication-formulas in first-order arithmetic by using Gentzen’s 1935 consistency proof. Next, we argue that this interpretation avoids the circularity urged by Gentzen.
著者
高橋 和之
出版者
日本法哲学会
雑誌
法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2005, pp.94-105,197, 2006-10-30 (Released:2010-02-15)
参考文献数
10

The idea of the rule of law is institutionalized and functions in different ways from country to country. The purpose of this report is to set forth a framework for comparing the different ways each state has designed the institutionalization and function of the rule of law understood as a constitutional principle. The rule of law as a constitutional principle orders the ruler, not the ruled or people without differenciation of the ruler and the ruled, to comply with law, the costitutional law in modern sense being a scheme to protect the ruled from the ruler. What interests constitutional scholars most should be the way and the extent to which the rule of law contributes to the guarantee of the fundamental values of constitutional law. As the rule of law is a project to subject politics to law, the rule of law thinking presupposes the conceptual separation of political and legal spheres. Only when political activites can be translated into and captured by legal concepts can politics be controled by law. Controle reflects equlibrium of political forces, and in the final analysis the rule of law is a project to establish balance of powers. We can distinguish two models of the rule of law: that of constitutional monarchy represented by British rule of law and German Rechtsstaat and that of constitutional democracy represented by American rule of law and french Etat legal. By combining with this distinction the difference between common law and civil law traditions we can decribe the disinguishing features of the rule of law of those states.
著者
高橋 広次
出版者
日本法哲学会
雑誌
法哲学年報 (ISSN:03872890)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.1995, pp.63-79, 1996-10-30 (Released:2008-11-17)
参考文献数
17