著者
奈良岡 聰智 小林 和幸 笹部 剛史 萩原 淳 小宮 京 大石 眞 赤坂 幸一 村井 良太 大山 礼子 葦名 ふみ 内藤 一成 伊東 かおり 原口 大輔
出版者
京都大学
雑誌
基盤研究(B)
巻号頁・発行日
2015-04-01

本研究は、衆参両院事務局などが所蔵する膨大な未公開資料群の本格的活用を通して、近現代日本の政治史を「議会政治」という観点から再検討した。具体的な成果は、以下の3点に要約される。①「議会政治」の展開過程、議会事務局・議会官僚の役割を多面的に検証した。②新出史料「河井弥八日記」を翻刻出版した。③イギリスの制度を参照しつつ、議会関係資料の保存・公開体制のあり方について検討を行った。
著者
内藤 一成
出版者
公益財団法人史学会
雑誌
史學雜誌 (ISSN:00182478)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.106, no.2, pp.234-260, 319-318, 1997-02-20

The political crisis that occurred in Japan in 1916 (Taisho 5) is represents a crucial stage in the transition between 1913 and 1918 from the "Keien" settlement to the era of parliamentary government. Although many historians have investigated the process of this political crisis, which lasted from February to October 1916, they have not fully understood the political situation during 1913-1918, known as "Taisho-zenki". This paper mainly investigates the complicated situation in the House of Peers at the time of the crisis, a subject that has here-tofore been ignored by almost all historians. First, the author attempts to elucidate negotiations concerning succession to the premiership among Okuma, Terauchi and Yamagata, a "Genro", during this crisis. It is generally thought that the crisis was caused by the stubbornness of Terauchi. However, he was the only one with the flexibility to solve the problem. On the contrary, it was Okuma who refused to compromise. Secondly, the House of Peers' Saiwai club, the largest group in the House, was split into many factions. Therefore, they did not have enough power to support the Terauchi Cabinet. Meanwhile, in the House of Representatives three main government Parties, the Rikkendoushi-kai Kensei-kai and Koyu Club, were united. into the "Kensei-kai" to support Takaaki Kato as prime minister. Okuma advised the Emperor to select Kato as his successor; but Yamagata opposed this move and selected Terauchi. Although Yamagata rejected Kato as primier, he did not think the new administration could stand up against both Houses. Nevertheless, contrary to Yamagata's expectations, Terauchi did not receive the support of both Houses, resulting in a new ministry that was fragile legislatively.
著者
内藤 一成
出版者
慶應義塾福沢研究センター
雑誌
近代日本研究 (ISSN:09114181)
巻号頁・発行日
no.29, pp.205-240, 2012

特集 : 大正期再考資料紹介はじめに一 芸術への目覚め : 三島通陽の少年時代二 演劇集団「友達座」の発展三 女優公募問題と華族社会四 宮内省の干渉五 友達座の解散おわりに