4 0 0 0 公論と暴力-革命の比較研究
この研究は近代に起きた6つの革命を公論と暴力の関係に着目しつつ比較する。取り上げるのはイギリス・フランス・日本・中国・ロシア・中東の革命で、日本と外国の専門家が互いに緊密な議論を行い、最後は英文論文集を刊行する。革命では公論と暴力が同時に誕生するが、暴力が蔓延する条件を探るのが第1の問題である。また、革命の終わりには暴力が排除されるが、その後、公論が維持されて自由な体制が生まれるのか、公論まで排除されて専制体制が生ずるのか、その分岐要因の解明が第2の課題である。さらに、諸革命がどんな連鎖関係に立っていたのか、アジアなど後発革命の側から先行革命の利用の様子を明らかにする。
- 著者
- 後藤 はる美
- 出版者
- 白山史学会
- 雑誌
- 白山史学 (ISSN:03859460)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- no.51, pp.27-56, 2015-05
1 0 0 0 OA 一七世紀イングランド北部における法廷と地域秩序 : 国教忌避者訴追をめぐって
- 著者
- 後藤 はる美
- 出版者
- 公益財団法人 史学会
- 雑誌
- 史学雑誌 (ISSN:00182478)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.121, no.10, pp.1685-1720, 2012-10-20 (Released:2017-12-01)
Catholicism, as "recusancy", became a crime prosecutable in the secular courts of early modern England after the introduction of the "recusant penal laws" during the 1580s. Recusancy, however, remained one of the least effectively prosecuted crimes throughout the seventeenth century. This was especially true in the north of England, remote from the centre and close to the northern border. The present case study concentrates on a lawsuit brought before the Star Chamber in London which was fought between groups of leading magistrates of the East Riding of Yorkshire. The case stemmed from a conflict that arouse among local justices over a much-disputed recusant prosecution at the quarter session at Pocklington (Yorkshire) in January 1615. The conflict flared up against a backdrop of heightened rivalries among leading Yorkshire gentry, which were reinforced by religious antagonism. The conflicting reactions of magisterial factions on recusant proceedings caused various interactions and subtle negotiations among the justices and between them and the grand jury, which played a crucial role in indicting recusants. The interplay among those involved, reconstructed from the interrogatories, depositions and witnesses, highlights several problems that existed in enforcing the recusant penal laws in the north of England. It also illuminates different stances adopted by individual justices and the grand jury and their influences at different points in the legal process. Furthermore, the allegations of litigants and their alleged conduct both testify to how they justified themselves at the two courts in question, one in the centre (the Star Chamber) and the other in the locality (the quarter session at Pocklington). By reconstructing process of recusant prosecution, the author describes the negotiations that took place among the conflicting justices and the grand jury, each of them acting according to the rules of law and locality. The two courts bacame strong magnetic fields to which were drawn intersecting polemics of Catholic/Protestant, old/new, and the justices/the grand jury dichotomies. It was a process in which people fought, achieved and maintained order in their locality, thus determining the practices regarding recusancy and its prosecution in the North. Furthermore, participation of individual subjects in this judicial process itself worked as an important opportunity for forging how order in the kingdom would be constituted.
1 0 0 0 OA 1641年―新しいコンテクストとパブリックな視角―
- 著者
- ジェーン・ オーマイヤ 後藤 はる美(訳)
- 出版者
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所
- 雑誌
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 = The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences,Toyo University (ISSN:13492276)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.22号別冊, pp.147-157, 2019-10
1 0 0 0 OA 「喚くふしだらな女たち」―イギリス革命期の女性の行為主体性を概念化する―
- 著者
- アン・ ヒューズ 後藤 はる美(訳)
- 出版者
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所
- 雑誌
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 = The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences,Toyo University (ISSN:13492276)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.22号別冊, pp.135-146, 2019-10
1 0 0 0 OA 「新しい社会史」と文化論的転回
- 著者
- マイケル・ ブラディック 後藤 はる美(訳)
- 出版者
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所
- 雑誌
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 = The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences,Toyo University (ISSN:13492276)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.22号別冊, pp.47-61, 2019-10
1 0 0 0 OA 修正主義と「新しい社会史」
- 著者
- ジョン・ モリル 後藤 はる美(訳)
- 出版者
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所
- 雑誌
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 = The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences,Toyo University (ISSN:13492276)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.22号別冊, pp.33-45, 2019-10
1 0 0 0 OA 分野の境界を越えて―「新しい社会史」と近世イングランドにおける政治文化―
- 著者
- ジョン・ ウォルタ 後藤 はる美(訳)
- 出版者
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所
- 雑誌
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 = The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences,Toyo University (ISSN:13492276)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.22号別冊, pp.5-23, 2019-10
1 0 0 0 OA 「社会史を再考する」
- 著者
- 鈴木 道也 後藤 はる美
- 出版者
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所
- 雑誌
- 東洋大学人間科学総合研究所紀要 = The Bulletin of the Institute of Human Sciences,Toyo University (ISSN:13492276)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.22号別冊, pp.1-4, 2019-10
1 0 0 0 OA インタビュー:近藤和彦教授ロング・インタビュー
- 著者
- 近藤 和彦 クリオ編集部 後藤 はる美 伊藤 剛史 辻本 諭
- 出版者
- 東京大学大学院人文社会系研究科西洋史学研究室「クリオの会」
- 雑誌
- クリオ = Clio : a journal of European studies
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.25, pp.1-48, 2011
1 0 0 0 OA 近世ヨーロッパ周縁世界における複合的国家編成の比較研究
- 著者
- 後藤 はる美
- 出版者
- 公益財団法人史学会
- 雑誌
- 史學雜誌 (ISSN:00182478)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.121, no.10, pp.1685-1720, 2012-10-20
Catholicism, as "recusancy", became a crime prosecutable in the secular courts of early modern England after the introduction of the "recusant penal laws" during the 1580s. Recusancy, however, remained one of the least effectively prosecuted crimes throughout the seventeenth century. This was especially true in the north of England, remote from the centre and close to the northern border. The present case study concentrates on a lawsuit brought before the Star Chamber in London which was fought between groups of leading magistrates of the East Riding of Yorkshire. The case stemmed from a conflict that arouse among local justices over a much-disputed recusant prosecution at the quarter session at Pocklington (Yorkshire) in January 1615. The conflict flared up against a backdrop of heightened rivalries among leading Yorkshire gentry, which were reinforced by religious antagonism. The conflicting reactions of magisterial factions on recusant proceedings caused various interactions and subtle negotiations among the justices and between them and the grand jury, which played a crucial role in indicting recusants. The interplay among those involved, reconstructed from the interrogatories, depositions and witnesses, highlights several problems that existed in enforcing the recusant penal laws in the north of England. It also illuminates different stances adopted by individual justices and the grand jury and their influences at different points in the legal process. Furthermore, the allegations of litigants and their alleged conduct both testify to how they justified themselves at the two courts in question, one in the centre (the Star Chamber) and the other in the locality (the quarter session at Pocklington). By reconstructing process of recusant prosecution, the author describes the negotiations that took place among the conflicting justices and the grand jury, each of them acting according to the rules of law and locality. The two courts bacame strong magnetic fields to which were drawn intersecting polemics of Catholic/Protestant, old/new, and the justices/the grand jury dichotomies. It was a process in which people fought, achieved and maintained order in their locality, thus determining the practices regarding recusancy and its prosecution in the North. Furthermore, participation of individual subjects in this judicial process itself worked as an important opportunity for forging how order in the kingdom would be constituted.