著者

金 ヨンロン

出版者

昭和文学会

雑誌

昭和文学研究 (ISSN:03883884)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.81, pp.222-225, 2020 (Released:2021-07-01)

著者

金子 明雄

出版者

昭和文学会

雑誌

昭和文学研究 (ISSN:03883884)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.81, pp.226-228, 2020 (Released:2021-07-01)

著者

金子 明雄

出版者

昭和文学会

雑誌

昭和文学研究 (ISSN:03883884)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.74, pp.188-190, 2017 (Released:2022-07-01)

著者

金 炯盛

出版者

関西法政治学研究会

雑誌

憲法論叢 (ISSN:24330795)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.13, pp.1-17, 2006-12-26 (Released:2018-01-10)

---

Unlike the past, modern society has been changed greatly on many sides. Especially, it is extremely revolutionary concerning about marriage and family. We are going to go over the normative meaning of marriage and family in constitution and analyze precedents that recently concerned. Article 36 of Korean constitution is as follows; Article 36 (1) Marriage and family life shall be entered into and sustained on the basis of individual dignity and equality of the sexes, and the State shall do everything in its power to achieve that goal. This emphasizes on individual dignity and equality of the sex. There are a lot of theories which are the general rule, the guarantee of system, natural liberties and the right to live for the legal character of the article. Precedents accepts these three things-the general rule, the guarantee of system, natural liberties-and it is seemingly right. Precedents protected a monogamy family system by making a application of adultery case (the criminal law Article 241), the unconstitutional petition of the income tax law Article 61, the unconstitutional recommendation of the civil law Article 809 (1) etc. At the same time, it firmly says equality between husband and wife and the freedom of marriage with declaring unconstitutionahty of the Article of civil law which rules the patriarchal family registry system (Hojuje), Moreover, the decision of Hojuje from the constitutional court is very important in the meaning of the harmony between tradition and the principle of equality. In the mean time, by the judgement above, traditional family and marriage system has been disappearing. These systems are suddenly reorganizing based on the dignity and equality of the individual. At this point, we had better find the alternatives about the system how to settle in the new structure.

著者

金井 明人 野村 なつき

出版者

一般社団法人 人工知能学会

雑誌

人工知能学会全国大会論文集 第28回 (2014)

巻号頁・発行日

pp.2F5OS01b3, 2014 (Released:2018-07-30)

---

映像作品においては,編集によって「違和感」あるいはその前段階としての「戸惑い」を認知時に生じさせることができ,それが映像への没入度と関係している.本発表では、近年の代表的な映像作品における「戸惑い」の認知を分析すると共に、それが物語的な切断を意図した映像編集の有無によって変化することを立証する.

著者

長谷川 正哉 島谷 康司 金井 秀作 沖 貞明 清水 ミシェルアイズマン 六車 晶子 大塚 彰

出版者

理学療法科学学会

雑誌

理学療法科学 (ISSN:13411667)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.25, no.3, pp.437-441, 2010 (Released:2010-07-28)

参考文献数

32

被引用文献数

6 2

---

〔目的〕浮き趾が歩行中の足底圧に与える影響について調べることを目的とした。〔対象〕健常成人女性104名に対し静止立位時の足趾接地状態の評価を行った結果から,浮き趾群20名および完全接地群15名を実験対象として抽出した。〔方法〕浮き趾群および完全接地群に対し歩行中の足底圧の計測を行い,足趾および前足部の荷重量,足底圧軌跡の軌跡長を抽出し比較検討した。また軌跡の特徴を分類し比較検討した。〔結果〕完全接地群と比較し浮き趾群では,足底圧軌跡長,足趾荷重量が小さく,足底圧軌跡が足趾まで到達しないことが確認された。〔結語〕浮き趾群では足趾による安定した支持基底面の形成ができず,歩行中の重心の前方移動が困難であること,および中足骨頭部に荷重が集中し,足部のアライメント異常につながる可能性があることが示唆された。

著者

金田 尚志

出版者

公益社団法人 日本農芸化学会

雑誌

化学と生物 (ISSN:0453073X)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.10, no.10, pp.681-682, 1972-10-25 (Released:2009-05-25)

被引用文献数

1

著者

金子 亜由美

出版者

日本科学史学会生物学史分科会

雑誌

生物学史研究 (ISSN:03869539)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.94, pp.71-86, 2016-08-31 (Released:2019-06-03)

著者

金 凡性

出版者

科学社会学会

雑誌

年報 科学・技術・社会 (ISSN:09199942)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.15, pp.71-90, 2006-06-30 (Released:2022-09-10)

著者

金岡 秀郎

出版者

内陸アジア史学会

雑誌

内陸アジア史研究 (ISSN:09118993)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.22, pp.21-38, 2007-03-31 (Released:2017-10-10)

著者

金子 明雄

出版者

日本文学協会

雑誌

日本文学 (ISSN:03869903)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.61, no.2, pp.100-102, 2012 (Released:2017-09-28)

著者

金澤 悠介

出版者

東北社会学研究会

雑誌

社会学研究 (ISSN:05597099)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.101, pp.37-59, 2018-03-28 (Released:2021-12-01)

参考文献数

34

---

本稿の目的は、先行研究とは異なるアプローチで不公平感を分析することをつうじて、「階層意識としての不公平感」の特質を再検討することである。不公平感についての先行研究では不公平感と階層的地位の関連が弱いという経験的知見がたびたび見出された結果、不公平感は「空論上の階層意識」として次第に注目を集めなくなっていったのだが、本稿はこれを不公平感そのものの特質というよりは先行研究のアプローチの問題だと考える。先行研究は不公平感を生み出す意識の構造を単純化してモデル化し、人々の抱く不公平感も同質的なものと想定したのに対し、本稿は(ⅰ)全般的不公平感・領域別不公平感・公平判断基準・社会の仕組みの認知という意識変数の内的構造と(ⅱ)その異質性を明らかにすることをつうじて、不公平感という意識がどのようなものなのかを解明しつつ、(ⅲ)不公平感の構造と階層的地位がどのように関連しているのかを検討することをつうじて、階層意識としての不公平感の特質を明らかにすることを目指す。以上のようなアプローチによって、一九九五年SSM調査B票を分析したところ、回答者の抱く不公平感は質的に異なる五つのタイプが存在し、それぞれの不公平感のタイプに結びついた階層集団が存在することが明らかになった。そして、この知見をもとに階層意識としての不公平感の特質を議論した。

著者

金子 智雄

出版者

国際安全保障学会

雑誌

国際安全保障 (ISSN:13467573)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.36, no.2, pp.117-138, 2008-09-30 (Released:2022-04-20)

著者

金子 将史

出版者

国際安全保障学会

雑誌

国際安全保障 (ISSN:13467573)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.33, no.3, pp.139-142, 2005-12-31 (Released:2022-04-24)

著者

金 凡性

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.51, no.261, pp.1-9, 2012 (Released:2021-07-20)

---

This paper depicts the historical evolution of ultraviolet devices in Japan during the interwar period. The outbreak of the First World War spurred the development of the glass industry in Japan, being triggered by the military demand on optical instruments in particular. Meanwhile, physicists needed special glass which could cut off ultraviolet radiation to protect the eyes during spectroscopic experiments. Furthermore, as the effects of the invisible rays on human health came to intrigue the medical and lay audience introduced by the works of Niels Ryberg Finsen, artificial sun lamps for actinotherapy were devised, fn Japan, Tokyo Electric (a forerunner of Toshiba) together with the physicist, Nagaoka Hantaro, promoted the development of anti-ultraviolet glass. A national institute based in Osaka chased the project. Eventually, with the advent of knowledge regarding the glass which was practically transparent to ultraviolet rays, the electric company launched a commodity for lay consumers in 1930. The electric device manufacturer produced ultraviolet radiators as a "load builder," during the times when the supply of electricity in Japan exceeded its demand. Ultraviolet radiators, used as tools for hygiene and public welfare as well as for medical treatment, thus trickled onto Japanese soil by the next World War.

著者

金山 浩司

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.49, no.256, pp.193-205, 2010 (Released:2021-07-22)

---

The present study seeks to reveal the unknown political factor of the philosophical-ideological disputes over physics in the pre-war Soviet Russia. Previous studies on this issue assumed conflicts between the two definite fractions to have a basic framework: courageous leading physicists on one hand, and foolish communists or old-generation scientists on the other. Such a distinct dichotomy, however, may have to be reconsidered after studying archival material. That is to say, the relationship between A.A. Maksimov, one of the representatives of communist ideology, and V.F. Mitkevich, a prominent specialist of the electrical technology, was more ambivalent than it seems to be. These two men apparently had a common aggressive character: both of them charged leading physicists, such as Ya. I. Frenkel' and A.F. Ioffe, of having an idealistic view. Yet, the correspondences exchanged between these 'opponents' clearly show that they severely disagreed (until 1937) on issues such as ontological views on mathematical notions or terminologies to be used in the dispute. Occasionally, the communist even criticized the electric engineer for overemphasizing the dangers of modern physical theories to materialism, an official Soviet philosophical system. Hence, until the mid 1930's, Mitkevich and Maksimov did not become confident allies of each other. This awkwardness might be regarded as one of the reasons why the dispute over the interpretation of modern physics did not result in a clear break between the professional physicists and the 'opponents'.

著者

金山 浩司

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.47, no.248, pp.193-205, 2008 (Released:2021-08-04)

---

In this study, I analysed the discourse of a philosophical dispute about the idea or theory of physics, which occurred in the first half of 1930-s in the Soviet Union. I examined the internal contents of the dispute between leading physicists and communist philosophers or old-generated technicians. This analysis has shown that against leading physicists such as Ia. I. Frenkel' or I.E. Tamm, their opponents such as V.E. Egorshin (communist philosopher) or V.F. Mitkevich (old-generation electrical engineer) insisted on the importance of materialistic/realistic interpretation of field proposed by Frenkel', which allowed the action in distance. Egorshin, based on Engels' philosophy, maintained the importance of the idea of energy as the reflection of the motion of real matters. Despite the ignorance (as pointed out by Soviet physicists) or bitterness of their discourse, the argument of the opponents is also understandable from their "anti-formalistic" tendency. This tendency has continued to form a base of the dispute about the philosophy of physics in the Soviet Union.

著者

金山 浩司

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.46, no.241, pp.25-29, 2007 (Released:2021-08-11)

著者

金山 浩司

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.45, no.239, pp.145-156, 2006 (Released:2021-08-11)

---

In this paper, I examine the reason for the subsidence of Soviet dispute over philosophical legitimation of modern physics in the late 1930s. The battle of scientists against party ideologues or their sympathizers was politically adventurous in the period of the Great Terror. In fact, established scientists such as Nikolai Vavilov were severely accused by opponents and were led even to be imprisoned. However, in spite of the heated attack to some leading physicists in the dispute over modern physics in philosophical journals, the worst tragedy was avoided in general. I maintain that Sergei Vavilov, one of the most influential physicists of this period, acted as a crucial negotiator in this process. By learning the Marxist terminology or a politically correct attitude in the discourse, Vavilov succeeded in soothing the party ideologues and at the same time guarding modern physics or physicists. In some respect he made a compromise, but it was a very valuable one.

著者

金 凡性

出版者

日本科学史学会

雑誌

科学史研究 (ISSN:21887535)

巻号頁・発行日

vol.43, no.232, pp.211-220, 2004 (Released:2021-08-12)

---

In this paper, I describe the process through which Japanese seismology tried to contribute to the development of a new technology, seismic exploration, in the interwar period. Even though the former authority enjoyed by Japanese seismology had been in decline since the early 1920s, the skill of the scientists who had devised seismographs and analyzed seismograms could be applied to the new technology. Seismic exploration, i. e., prospecting for oil using artificial seismic waves, was welcomed as a new way of contributing to Japan's quest for petroleum. On the other hand, some civil engineers who worked for the National Railway adapted this new promising technology for their own purpose, which further disseminated the application of the earthquake science. Because of the cooperation of scientists and engineers, seismic exploration in Japan developed, by the mid 1930s, to the extent that it was recognized as a military science. However, the conflict as to the purpose, leadership, and identity of seismic exploration had been born in the process, which disturbed the unification of the practitioners.