- 著者
 
          - 
             
             Hidehiro Iwakawa
             
             Masateru Takigawa
             
             Junji Yamaguchi
             
             Claire A Martin
             
             Masahiko Goya
             
             Tasuku Yamamoto
             
             Miki Amemiya
             
             Takashi Ikenouchi
             
             Miho Negishi
             
             Iwanari Kawamura
             
             Kentaro Goto
             
             Takatoshi Shigeta
             
             Takuro Nishimura
             
             Tomomasa Takamiya
             
             Susumu Tao
             
             Shinsuke Miyazaki
             
             Hiroyuki Watanabe
             
             Tetsuo Sasano
             
          
 
          
          
          - 出版者
 
          - The Japanese Circulation Society
 
          
          
          - 雑誌
 
          - Circulation Journal (ISSN:13469843)
 
          
          
          - 巻号頁・発行日
 
          - pp.CJ-23-0574,  (Released:2023-10-27)
 
          
          
          - 参考文献数
 
          - 28
 
          
          
          - 被引用文献数
 
          - 
             
             
             1
             
             
          
        
 
        
        
        Background: For lesion size prediction, each input parameter, including ablation energy (AE), and output parameter, such as impedance, is individually used. We hypothesize that using both parameters simultaneously may be more optimal.Methods and Results: Radiofrequency applications at a range of power (30–50 W), contact force (10 g and 20 g), duration (10–60 s), and catheter orientation with normal saline (NS)- or half-normal saline (HNS)-irrigation were performed in excised porcine hearts. The correlations, with lesion size of AE, absolute impedance drop (∆Imp-drop), relative impedance drop (%Imp-drop), and AE*%Imp-drop were examined. Lesion size was analyzed in 283 of 288 lesions (NS-irrigation, n=142; HNS-irrigation, n=141) without steam pops. AE*%Imp-drop consistently showed the strongest correlations with lesion maximum depth (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.91; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.94), surface area (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.87; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.86), and volume (NS-irrigation, ρ=0.94; HNS-irrigation, ρ=0.94) compared with the other parameters. Moreover, compared with AE alone, AE*%Imp-drop significantly improved the strength of correlation with lesion maximum depth (AE vs. AE*%Imp-drop, ρ=0.83 vs. 0.91, P<0.01), surface area (ρ=0.73 vs. 0.87, P<0.01), and volume (ρ=0.84 vs. 0.94, P<0.01) with NS-irrigation. This tendency was also observed with HNS-irrigation. Parallel catheter orientation showed a better correlation with lesion depth and volume using ∆Imp-drop, %Imp-drop, and AE*%Imp-drop than perpendicular orientation.Conclusions: The combination of input and output parameters is more optimal than each single parameter for lesion prediction.