著者
久保 一之
出版者
西南アジア研究会
雑誌
西南アジア研究 = Bulletin of the Society for Western and Southern Asiatic Studies, Kyoto University (ISSN:09103708)
巻号頁・発行日
no.85, pp.40-72, 2016

The Japanese translation of Nizām al-mulk's Siyar al-mulūk (or the Book of Government) by Prof. K. Itani and Prof. M. Inaba was published last year. I had participated in their reading club in the past and for the first time recognized the importance of the book in the history of the Irano-Islamic political culture. On this occasion, I focus on the inheritance of the Irano-Islamic political culture in the Timurids conveyed through this book. In Timurid Iran and Central Asia, Nizām al-mulk was a well-known historical figure or legendary vazir, and historians have provided an adequate biography of him based on early literature in their literary works. The famous literary man Husayn Kāšifī knew about the Siyar al-mulūk at least from Ġazālī's Nasīḥat al-mulūk, and the title and the author's name are found at the beginning of the quotation from it in Isfizārī's Rawżāt al-jannāt. Moreover, several stories from the Siyar al-mulūk are found in memoirs by Kāšifī's pupil, Maḥmūd Vāsifī. The attitude of the Timurid rulers toward the religious leaders seems to have been based on Nizām al-mulk's advice. The custom of consensual decision-making with these leaders and other intellectuals, according to Kāšifī, derived from ancient Iran. The more evident form of the Irano-Islamic political culture is the mazālim court; here Nizām al-mulk places emphasis on the rule that the rulers themselves must hold this court. The Mongol rulers and Timūr held the Mongol court, the yarġu court, in the name of (or at the same time) as the mazālim court. Although Timūr's son Šāh-ruḥ is said to have abolished the yarġu system, it survived until the last moment of the Timurid dynasty. During the reign of Timūr's successors, the yarġu court of the rulers was held in the same place as the mazālim court. Initially, this place was called the dīvān-i buzurg and later, simply the dīvān (rarely the dīvān-i a'lā). There the questions of state and finance were discussed and decided, and the official ceremonies were held by the ruler, his eminent liegemen, and the religious leaders.
著者
辻 明日香
出版者
日本中東学会
雑誌
日本中東学会年報 = Annals of Japan Association for Middle East Studies (ISSN:09137858)
巻号頁・発行日
no.31, pp.29-57, 2015

After the Islamic conquest, the landscape of Egypt underwent great changes. Arabization gradually advanced, and the Coptic language died out. However, the Islamization of Egypt, which was slower than that of other Middle Eastern areas, was never completed. This paper explores the little known history of the Coptic community in this period through an analysis of the names of the bishops and their sees of the Nile Delta; it seeks to determine which sees were occupied and which became extinct. Of the twenty-four bishoprics listed in the synod of 1086, ten were extinct and four were on the verge of extinction by the end of the twelfth century. In the thirteenth to the fourteenth century, a different situation emerged: Bishoprics were restored or newly created, mostly in the Gharbiya Province, the richest part of the Delta. The Coptic Church was still functioning in the Delta, as is also attested by the itinerary of Yuhanna al-Rabban, a Coptic saint who wandered in the Gharbiya from the late thirteenth to the early fourteenth centuries.
著者
青島 忠一朗
出版者
一般社団法人 日本オリエント学会
雑誌
オリエント (ISSN:00305219)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.59, no.1, pp.14-26, 2016
被引用文献数
1

<p>This paper discusses how the accounts of rebellion in Assyrian royal inscriptions were described and manipulated, taking the Annals of Ashurnasirpal II as an example.</p><p> Accounts that deal with rebellions can be divided into two types : 1) those where the suppression of the rebellion is clearly mentioned, and 2) those where a punitive expedition is presented in a way to suggest that the military activity is unrelated to a rebellion. Those of the first type present putting down rebellious acts that disturb the world order as the reason for the campaign. By describing those acts the accounts put enemy in the wrong and justify the military activity of the king.</p><p> Those of the second type, where the rebellion is concealed, include not only accounts of unsuccessful punitive expeditions, but also those of campaigns that fulfilled their aim. A number of rebellions in the same region, even if the king subjugated them each time, might expose the incompetency of the king and the fragility of his rule. Since this does not lend itself to royal praise, the accounts describe only the last rebellion in a certain region as such.</p><p> The failure to mention the rebellion in the account was not merely intended to cover up an unfavorable fact, but was also utilized to glorify a royal deed. If a description of the rebellion is left out of an account, it is indistinguishable from the account of a campaign against a foreign land. The punitive expedition is thus described as if it was a military activity against an unsubmissive ruler. In particular, through first hiding and then mentioning rebellions, the suppression of repeated rebellions in the same region is transformed into the conquest of "unsubmissive" land and the stabilization of the kings rule through the elimination of the rebel.</p>