- 著者
- 寺尾 範野
- 出版者
- 藤原書店
- 雑誌
- 社会思想史研究 : 社会思想史学会年報 (ISSN:03864510)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- no.38, pp.144-163, 2014
- 著者
- 寺尾 範野
- 出版者
- 経済学史学会
- 雑誌
- 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.54, no.2, pp.45-61, 2013-01
1 0 0 0 OA 書評
1 0 0 0 OA 書評
1 0 0 0 OA ニューリベラリズムによるボザンケ批判の再考 ―倫理、国家、福祉をめぐって―
- 著者
- 寺尾 範野
- 出版者
- 日本イギリス哲学会
- 雑誌
- イギリス哲学研究 (ISSN:03877450)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.35, pp.53-68, 2012-03-20 (Released:2018-03-30)
- 参考文献数
- 44
This paper re-appraises L.T. Hobhouseʼs (1864-1929) and J.A. Hobsonʼs (1858-1940) criticisms of British idealist philosopher Bernard Bosanquet (1848-1923). Their critique has been seen as an indication of the theoretical and ideological distance between the new liberalism and British idealism. Comparing their attacks on Bosanquetʼs methodology, theory of will, and state and welfare theories with what Bosanquet actually argued, however, reveals not only the irrelevance of their criticisms but also some fundamental commonalities between these two philosophical movements: they shared an interest in the methodological integration of science and ethics, a focus on the reciprocity between morality and society, and a repudiation of the spirit of materialism, all of which provided the ʻidealist liberalʼ background for the early British welfare state.
1 0 0 0 OA L. T. ホブハウスにおけるニューリベラリズムの社会改革思想 中間団体論と分配論の連関
- 著者
- 寺尾 範野
- 出版者
- 経済学史学会
- 雑誌
- 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.54, no.2, pp.45-61, 2013 (Released:2019-08-22)
- 被引用文献数
- 1 1
This paper examines British new liberal thinker L.T. Hobhouseʼs (1864―1929) views on social reform with a particular focus on the connection between his early economic thought on volun-tary organizations and his later ethical theory of distributive justice, and demonstrates that these aspects of his thought were theoretically com-plementary, together composing Hobhouseʼs life-long pursuit of the moralization of capital-ism. In the 1890s, Hobhouse already shared with contemporaneous new liberals several moralistic concerns over the issue of social reform. They all (1) thought of the development of morality as the fundamental aim of social reform and (2) emphasized the stateʼs duty to provide individu-als with the legal conditions necessary for moral development. Early in his career, Hobhouse fo-cused on the first point, identifying trade unions and co-operative societies as effective agencies for instilling in workers the values of fellowship and mutual aid. Hobhouse developed his ideas on state inter-ference after the 1910s, particularly from the perspective of distributive justice. Individuals were considered to have reciprocal rights and duties in relation to others and the state: they were seen as having the right to demand legal, material and social conditions sufficient for de-veloping their moral personalities and the duty to undertake their own social functions. A just distribution ensured by the state was seen as be-ing one that was capable of maintaining the per-formance of such functions. Hobhouse saw the roles of intermediate or-ganizations and the state as complementary, thus developing new liberal thought on social reform from a pluralistic-cum-moralistic perspective. To what extent this “ethical welfare pluralism” was common at the turn of the century would be a question worth examining in the historical study of the British welfare state. JEL classification numbers: B 19, B 31, I 31.
1 0 0 0 OA 「精神薄弱者」の隔離と幸福 : 軽度知的障害をめぐる世紀転換期イギリス優生思想の展開
- 著者
- 寺尾 範野 Hanno Terao
- 雑誌
- 共立国際研究 : 共立女子大学国際学部紀要 = The Kyoritsu journal of international studies
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.35, pp.89-105, 2018-03
This paper attempts to clarify in what ways eugenicist thinkers in late 19th and early 20th century Britain justified the segregation of people with mild intellectual disability (then called the "feeble-minded") into specialized institutions. For this purpose, the discourse of main eugenicist thinkers at that time, such as Karl Pearson, Alfred Tredgold, Sidney Webb, and Mary Dendy, is explored. It is found that, in addition to using "hard" discourse, which emphasized the threat of the feeble-minded to British society and insisted on prohibiting their marriage and reproduction, they also often used "soft" discourse, which justified segregated institutions as ideal places for providing the feeble-minded with humanitarian care and for realizing their happiness. The paper concludes that such "soft" discourse could be even more influential than "hard" discourse at the time the Mental Deficiency Act was enacted in 1913.
- 著者
- 寺尾 範野
- 出版者
- 経済学史学会
- 雑誌
- 経済学史研究 (ISSN:18803164)
- 巻号頁・発行日
- vol.54, no.2, pp.45-61, 2013
- 被引用文献数
- 1
This paper examines British new liberal thinker L.T. Hobhouseʼs (1864―1929) views on social reform with a particular focus on the connection between his early economic thought on volun-tary organizations and his later ethical theory of distributive justice, and demonstrates that these aspects of his thought were theoretically com-plementary, together composing Hobhouseʼs life-long pursuit of the moralization of capital-ism. In the 1890s, Hobhouse already shared with contemporaneous new liberals several moralistic concerns over the issue of social reform. They all (1) thought of the development of morality as the fundamental aim of social reform and (2) emphasized the stateʼs duty to provide individu-als with the legal conditions necessary for moral development. Early in his career, Hobhouse fo-cused on the first point, identifying trade unions and co-operative societies as effective agencies for instilling in workers the values of fellowship and mutual aid. Hobhouse developed his ideas on state inter-ference after the 1910s, particularly from the perspective of distributive justice. Individuals were considered to have reciprocal rights and duties in relation to others and the state: they were seen as having the right to demand legal, material and social conditions sufficient for de-veloping their moral personalities and the duty to undertake their own social functions. A just distribution ensured by the state was seen as be-ing one that was capable of maintaining the per-formance of such functions. Hobhouse saw the roles of intermediate or-ganizations and the state as complementary, thus developing new liberal thought on social reform from a pluralistic-cum-moralistic perspective. To what extent this "ethical welfare pluralism" was common at the turn of the century would be a question worth examining in the historical study of the British welfare state.JEL classification numbers: B 19, B 31, I 31.