2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[39] 十八ノ下 屋敷之部,

2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[37] 十八ノ上 屋敷之部,

2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[35] 十七ノ中 埋立地之部,

2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[18] 八ノ下 金銀銭両替之部,

2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[16] 七ノ下 米穀之部,

2 0 0 0 車両と電気

著者
車両電気協会 [編]
出版者
車両電気協会
巻号頁・発行日
vol.38(2), no.442, 1987-02
著者
五十嵐 隆幸
出版者
一般財団法人 日本国際政治学会
雑誌
国際政治 (ISSN:04542215)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.2019, no.197, pp.197_42-197_57, 2019-09-25 (Released:2020-04-16)
参考文献数
104

Was the Sino-American Rapprochement a turning point that changed everything? In 1969, the ROC changed the military strategy from “Offensive Posture” to “Unity of Offensive and Defensive”. Certainly, the advent of Nixon gave a big impact to the ROC’s national security, which heavily relied on the US. However, the ROC Government might decide to change its military strategy from “Retaking the Mainland,” which had been attempted for over a decade, to building up the consolidation of Taiwan’s defense when encountering the escalation of the PRC’s military threat even at the peak of the chaotic Great Leap Forward and Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution.The chaos in Mainland China in the 1960s provided a chance for the ROC to retake the mainland. The ROC would have been able to initiate military operations if received support from the US Nevertheless, US Government after the Kennedy administration was seeking coexistence with the PRC and therefore rejected all ROC’s requests.At that time the PRC was strengthening its nuclear capability and conventional forces despite being in a state of political chaos. In response to the growing military threat of the PRC, improvement of the ROC government’s defense capability to secure “Taiwan” became its top priority. Moreover, when the US abolition of Military Assistance Program was announced, the ROC Government was forced to improve military advancement at the expense of its own economy and spend the limited budget on defense in priority. Therefore, the ROC Government had begun to reform the “Offensive Posture” strategy that it adopted since 1949, and decided to change to the “Unity of Offensive and Defensive” strategy that focused on defense more than before. This was before Nixon put forth the “Guam Doctrine” and started to approach the PRC.Division of “China” was incorporated into the Cold War and immobilized. Although the chaos in Mainland China in the 1960s was likely to develop into “hot war” if ROC took military action. The US suppressed the ROC’s action for changing the status quo and avoided military conflict with the PRC. There is no doubt that the current US-China-Taiwan relations was formed in the 1970s, beginning with Nixon’s rapprochement to the PRC. However, the structure of maintaining the status quo of the ROC’s endeavor to acquire the US military commitment to resist the PRC’s continuous military expansion was gradually formed through the 1960s.
著者
信濃史学会 編
出版者
信濃史学会
巻号頁・発行日
vol.25(1), no.277, 1973-01

2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[6] 二下 御触町触之部,

2 0 0 0 OA 安永撰要類集

出版者
巻号頁・発行日
vol.[4] 二上 御触町触之部,
著者
Kazutoshi ABE
出版者
The Association of Japanese Geographers
雑誌
Geographical review of Japan, Series B (ISSN:02896001)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.69, no.1, pp.70-82, 1996-06-01 (Released:2008-12-25)
参考文献数
157
被引用文献数
3 5

The postwar development of Japanese urban geography is divided into four periods. The amount of research in urban geography has increased, expanding study targets and analytical methods. With an increase in studies of urbanization in the 1950s, heated debate ensued and stimulated urban geographers, leading to the subsequent development of urban geography. There are two approaches, to regard a city as a specific point or as an area. The former is represented by studies on the central place and the urban system, while the latter is represented by studies on the internal structure of a city. These two have been dealt with almost equally by Japanese urban geographers. The trends of urban geography comprise the following points: an emphasis on the functional aspects; the introduction of more quantitative approaches; and an increase in the number of studies of foreign cities. Two points are indispensable for the further development of Japanese urban geography: controversy and theorization. The implications of the former are evident, judging from the role that debate played in the initial urbanization controversy. Clearly, progress cannot be made without dispute and debate. Theorization is equally important. Quantitative geography was originally oriented toward theory, although theorization can be accomplished without the use of a quantitative approach. Whether quantitative or nonquantitative approaches are taken depends on the attitude of researchers, but both provide Japanese urban geography, which has traditionally depended on imported foreign accomplishments for its development, with an opportunity to transmit information internationally.
著者
笠亭仙果 作
出版者
鶴屋喜右衛門
巻号頁・発行日
vol.初編, 1831