著者
勝藤 猛
出版者
東洋史研究会
雑誌
東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.17, no.2, pp.125-142, 1958-09-01
著者
勝藤 猛
出版者
大阪外国語大学
雑誌
大阪外国語大学論集 (ISSN:09166637)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.9, pp.225-234, 1993-09-30

據《史記巻九十七・〓生(〓食其)列傅》,漢三年(公元前二〇四年)西楚霸王項羽逼至榮陽,圍攻漢王劉邦,漢王遁走,固守鞏,洛。常此劉邦生死關頭,〓生〓計説 : "願足下急復進兵,收取榮陽,據敖倉之栗,塞成皋之瞼……"。據《高祖本紀》,高祖三年漢王出榮陽入關,收兵欲復東進。此時袁生勸劉邦説:"願君王出武關,項羽必引兵南走……,令榮陽,成皋之間且得休。……則楚所備者多,力分,漢得休,……破楚必矣。"〓,袁所説,雖有些不同,但以榮陽一帯爲〓點,養精蓄鋭,伺機反攻的戦略方針則相同。由此觀之,《史記》此段記載可以認爲是歴史事實。若此論斷成立,《留侯(張良)世家》中有關此段的記載便大可懐疑。據《留侯世家》,項羽前來奪取榮陽時,〓食其爲劉邦出課日,〓若劉邦分封六國後嗣,則六國君民必皆感恩戴徳,合力擁戴劉邦。劉邦聽了此話便毫不猶豫地聽從了。〓生〓此計與《〓生列傅》完全相反。當時諸侯威信業已掃地,六國後裔亦已淪落,因此分封諸侯,牽制楚軍之難以奏效,洞若觀火,劉邦雖禍在旦夕,不得冷靜思考,也理應駁斥〓生謬論。宋王若虚《津〓南遺老集・史記辨惑》云:"張良八難,古今以爲美談,〓疑此論甚疏",並對張良論難劉邦八條,逐一提出疑問。筆者認爲,《留侯世家》中〓食其〓計一段記載並非史實,而是司馬遷爲了嘲笑劉邦昏庸無能而創作的虚構。如此解釋,王若虚之疑問方可水釋。
著者
勝藤 猛
雑誌
岩手県立大学盛岡短期大学部研究論集 = Bulletin of Morioka Junior College Iwate Prefectural University (ISSN:13489720)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.3, pp.5-13, 2001-03-01

After the breakdown of the Qin empire, there was a leader named Liu Bang (247-195 B.C.), who built the Han dynasty. Among his followers, three men were particularly efficient, and brought him to the throne. First, Zhang Liang was a staff-officer, so to speak, with female appearance. He gave his master valuable advice at the headquarters. Secondly, Xiao Ho was a well-educated paymaster in charge of supplying the front with personnel and provisions, searching and arranging documents from the destroyed Qin court. Finally, Han Xin, here under discussion, was an able army commander, good at intelligence service as well as tactics. The first two were in their sovereign's high esteem, while the last fell into disgrace and was killed in the end. Court chronicler Si-ma Qian writes a hundred years later, "One who has more courage than one's lord will be easily ruined. One whose success is above all will not be awarded". This is the destiny of Han Xin. The author tries to describe a hero of a tragedy.
著者
勝藤 猛 Takeshi KATSUFUJI 岩手県立大学盛岡短期大学部 MORIOKA JUNIOR COLLEGE IWATE PREFECTURAL UNIVERSITY
雑誌
岩手県立大学盛岡短期大学部研究論集 = Bulletin of Morioka Junior College Iwate Prefectural University (ISSN:13489720)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.3, pp.5-13, 2001-03-01

After the breakdown of the Qin empire, there was a leader named Liu Bang (247-195 B.C.), who built the Han dynasty. Among his followers, three men were particularly efficient, and brought him to the throne. First, Zhang Liang was a staff-officer, so to speak, with female appearance. He gave his master valuable advice at the headquarters. Secondly, Xiao Ho was a well-educated paymaster in charge of supplying the front with personnel and provisions, searching and arranging documents from the destroyed Qin court. Finally, Han Xin, here under discussion, was an able army commander, good at intelligence service as well as tactics. The first two were in their sovereign's high esteem, while the last fell into disgrace and was killed in the end. Court chronicler Si-ma Qian writes a hundred years later, "One who has more courage than one's lord will be easily ruined. One whose success is above all will not be awarded". This is the destiny of Han Xin. The author tries to describe a hero of a tragedy.
著者
勝藤 猛
出版者
大阪外国語大学
雑誌
大阪外国語大学論集 (ISSN:09166637)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.13, pp.131-151, 1995-09-29

The history of the Far Eastern Asia before the modern age may be defined as a history of interactions between pastoral or nomadic peoples in the north and agricultural and urbanized China in the south. Si-ma Qian (145?-86? BC) was a court-historiographer under the Emperor Wu-di of the Han Dynasty. When he expressed at a court meeting his sympathy for Li Ling, a Chinese soldier defeated at a battle with the warrior-horsemen Xung-nu, or the Huns, he was put in prison and was made eunuch. Recovering from a desperate mood, he resumed to write a history of China. It was a kind of comtjensation for the physical defect. We see from his life how weak and miserable an intellectual is in the face of a sovereign. His Records of History, however, as a model of Chinese historiography, has been loved and respected for thousands of years.
著者
勝藤 猛
出版者
東洋史研究會
雑誌
東洋史研究 (ISSN:03869059)
巻号頁・発行日
vol.34, no.4, pp.540-562, 1976-03-31